LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

High HP low torque high revving engine options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2011 | 02:24 PM
  #1  
AlexTVR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Uk
Default High HP low torque high revving engine options

Hi guys

Im thinking of doing a engine transplant in the future

But the cars drivetrain wont be able to handle much more than 400ft lb's of torque (at the fly) with out spending crazy money

But im wanting 500-550HP at the fly,

And would like it to rev high 7500rpm if possible

What combination would be best for this? if at all possible

Thanks

Alex
Old 10-26-2011 | 02:27 PM
  #2  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 7
From: South Jersey
Default

Regardless you're still going to need the drivetrain to handle the power and RPMs. What you're asking for isn't very feasible/reliable.
Old 10-26-2011 | 02:29 PM
  #3  
AlexTVR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Uk
Default

Its torque that kills drivetrain not HP
Old 10-26-2011 | 02:45 PM
  #4  
BIGCAT7274's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
From: Apopka FL
Default

your going to have to go pretty short on the stroke. 3.25 or less.
Old 10-26-2011 | 02:50 PM
  #5  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,064
Likes: 546
From: Jackstandican
Default

Originally Posted by AlexTVR
Its torque that kills drivetrain not HP
If you are going to drag race then you are going to have to rev to the moon before launching which means you may exert the equivalent amount of devastating torque through the driveline than if you had average torque.
It's not necessarily any given amount of torque that kills parts. It's shock to the driveline.
Old 10-26-2011 | 02:57 PM
  #6  
AlexTVR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Uk
Default

Originally Posted by SS RRR
If you are going to drag race then you are going to have to rev to the moon before launching which means you may exert the equivalent amount of devastating torque through the driveline than if you had average torque.
It's not necessarily any given amount of torque that kills parts. It's shock to the driveline.
It will be used to fast road/track

Where would I find a rotating kit for such a short stroke?
Old 10-26-2011 | 03:11 PM
  #7  
bowtienut's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 4
From: Bright, IN
Default

Put an L99 (4.3L V8 from 94-96 Caprice) crank in an LT1 block. It's been done before, but I don't know the details.
All I know is it can be done Cheap, knowing the guy that did it!
Stock parts, but you'd want a blueprint rebuild for the way you want to use it.
Old 10-26-2011 | 04:19 PM
  #8  
quik95lt1's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 12
From: Rhode Island
Default

dont mean to rain on your parade here but what you are proposing is very unlogical...........make the car right to handle the power then handle the power plant........i can 100% guarantee issues with the road you are trying to take........do it the right way...........it will be cheaper to run a properly designed mid level engine and spend the rest of your money on the driveline than spend all you money on high dollar parts to rev the car high for no reason at all.......

also stoke/bore does dictate torque/hp but its less than 50% the factor......top end design and camshaft selection will dictate the way the motor makes power.........
Old 10-26-2011 | 04:23 PM
  #9  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 14
Default

The guy Pat is referring to used my old L99 crank and the L99 rods with LT1 pistons, the L99 rods are something like 5.94 so the L99 had the same height piston as an LT1 and used a longer rod to get the piston near the deck. I probably wouldn't trust stock L99 rods at those rpms though, might work, but finding out it didn't would be expensive.
Old 10-26-2011 | 04:29 PM
  #10  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 14
Default

I had another thought here, if the drivetrain is that fragile the car may not like LT1 weight suspension and handling wise.
Why not try a aluminum 5.3l the OEM computer can then handle your rpm goal which the LT1 one can not.
Old 10-26-2011 | 07:13 PM
  #11  
gregrob's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 4
From: 6,000+ feet
Default

Vtak brah
Old 10-26-2011 | 08:16 PM
  #12  
Puck's Avatar
TECH Veteran

iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 6
Default

You wont spend extra to beef up your drivetrain, but you'll spend it on aftermarket ignition?? Seems bass aackwards to me.
Old 10-26-2011 | 09:36 PM
  #13  
defaultexistence's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 1
From: fort walton beach,fl
Default

Torque gets you turd moving... What a retarded waste of space this thread will be..
Old 10-27-2011 | 05:01 PM
  #14  
BIGCAT7274's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
From: Apopka FL
Default

have any of you idiots figured out the fact that maybe the word "transplant" may have bearing on the availability of parts to beef of the drive train.
Old 10-27-2011 | 05:25 PM
  #15  
05HD's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 1
From: CT/NJ
Default

Seems to me you are looking to swap in the wrong engine. Look at swapping in a turbo Honda motor instead. They are all torqueless wonders that rev to the moon.
Old 10-27-2011 | 07:24 PM
  #16  
Big Al's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 970
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by AlexTVR
Its torque that kills drivetrain not HP
I beg to differ with you but, it's shock loading that kills drive lines. Lets say you are turning 7,000 RPM and you smack second gear, what do you think is going on downstream from the transmission as the RPM comes down?

Don't start another torque/horsepower war, PLEASE. It's all horsepower! (Gasp, did I really say that!) Three big fat guys sitting on a couch exert more pounds of torque than your engine and no horsepower

Al 95 Z28
Old 10-27-2011 | 10:04 PM
  #17  
vtec's Avatar
Resident Racing Jerk
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: sc
Default

used crank and rods from a cup motor and custom pistons. will also need the correct bearings/spacers to use the small journal crank in the large journal block. and misc. other things.....
Old 10-27-2011 | 10:45 PM
  #18  
Sof86's Avatar
On The Tree

 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
Vtak brah
Ding ding bingo! lol
Old 10-27-2011 | 11:57 PM
  #19  
Mississippi's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Horn Lake, MS
Default

Blah blah blah, torque, horsepower, etc etc etc. You NEED them both to move. You can compensate one for the other in your builds but why would you focus on that aspect? Just build it reliably to do what you want. You want to hit the track, start in the suspension and driveline. You wanna go fast down the strip, make torque/power blah blah whatever you want to call it. Simple as that. Buy some suspension, buy some bolt ons, buy some gears, and forget revving to 9k in an lt1 without BOOKOO cash.
Old 10-29-2011 | 02:44 AM
  #20  
Nastyc4's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 861
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Default

I love saying this...

Cheap Fast Reliable

Pick two.



Quick Reply: High HP low torque high revving engine options



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.