LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

injectors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2012, 09:51 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
draggin97s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 05HD
If that is the case, our stock injectors and SVO 30s are both ancient designs. A bigger, newer injector would atomize better even at 1/2 the pulse width plus have a much better chance of getting all of the fuel in while the intake valve is open.
i dont believe that to be true, but i dont have the facts to back it up. So.... i cant argue..
Old 01-11-2012, 09:56 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

This subject has been hashed and rehashed so many times for so many years.
I know all the theory; I've run all the numbers; looked at tons of data on my own car and others' cars. Seen injector duty cycles (as reported on DM) exceed 100% routinely even on roadrace cars and never seen an injector failure with the SVO's on those vehicles.
I'm an engineer, so I don't dismiss theory lightly. But when the theory doesn't support real life, it's flawed.
One theory that I believe as to why smaller injectors work better is not the spray pattern per se, but the transient (on/off) time as a percentage of total flowing time; the atomized fuel available for combustion is more consistent.

You can listen to the people who figure things out for themselves and go fast or you can listen to those who just repeat some "well-articulated" arguments they've read.
Old 01-11-2012, 10:02 AM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
 
05HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CT/NJ
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by bowtienut
This subject has been hashed and rehashed so many times for so many years.
I know all the theory; I've run all the numbers; looked at tons of data on my own car and others' cars. Seen injector duty cycles (as reported on DM) exceed 100% routinely even on roadrace cars and never seen an injector failure with the SVO's on those vehicles.
I'm an engineer, so I don't dismiss theory lightly. But when the theory doesn't support real life, it's flawed.
One theory that I believe as to why smaller injectors work better is not the spray pattern per se, but the transient (on/off) time as a percentage of total flowing time; the atomized fuel available for combustion is more consistent.

You can listen to the people who figure things out for themselves and go fast or you can listen to those who just repeat some "well-articulated" arguments they've read.
I know you and Daren are both fast, that is why I wanted to hear why you guys thought it was working. Know anyone who has tried some of the new stuff like injector dynamics?
Old 01-11-2012, 10:11 AM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
blackjack325's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RGV, TX
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OEM injectors are 24lb right? On 97's at least is what I've read. That good enough for a .040 over block with le2 head and cam package? Would it depend on the cam size?
Old 01-11-2012, 10:32 AM
  #25  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,037
Received 534 Likes on 386 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blackjack325
OEM injectors are 24lb right? On 97's at least is what I've read. That good enough for a .040 over block with le2 head and cam package? Would it depend on the cam size?
I was at 370rwhp running 12.0 @ 115 with stock injectors and duty cycle was approx 85% IIRC. '94 and up are indeed 24lb'ers.
Old 01-11-2012, 01:08 PM
  #26  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TravisMcGill2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: chats,ga
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for all the info guys. I will try the svo's and see how they do..
Old 01-11-2012, 02:32 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Rob94hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,662
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I have 42's so you should do quite well with them.
Old 01-11-2012, 06:17 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
GIZMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 2,780
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rob94hawk
I have 42's so you should do quite well with them.
I had 42 lb injectors on my LS7 (389 ci). The ¨experts¨ said that I didn´t have near enough injector. After I made a couple of dyno pulls they went quiet (588 rwhp)!

I have 24 lb injectors in Gump. I feel that the reason the smaller injectors work better is that you get better atomization at WOT. My 24´s are not maxed. I have tried different brand 30´s and have always lost performance. The only way to know for sure what your combination needs is to run a wide band and data log the runs.
Old 01-11-2012, 07:25 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Rob94hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,662
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GIZMO
I had 42 lb injectors on my LS7 (389 ci). The ¨experts¨ said that I didn´t have near enough injector. After I made a couple of dyno pulls they went quiet (588 rwhp)!

I have 24 lb injectors in Gump. I feel that the reason the smaller injectors work better is that you get better atomization at WOT. My 24´s are not maxed. I have tried different brand 30´s and have always lost performance. The only way to know for sure what your combination needs is to run a wide band and data log the runs.
Interesting. I use 42's just incase I had the insane thought of using nitrous. Didn't think about the atomization. Would be nice to run a wide band and see if it could be fine tuned as well. Damn car is running so strong now I can't imagine I could gain anything from an injector change. But then again I'm not a tuning expert.
Old 01-12-2012, 06:59 AM
  #30  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
97pontta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Very interesting thread. I'm also in the market to purchase a set of injectors for my 355 AI 200cc H/C build and have been recommended anywhere from 30lb to 42lb injectors but I haven’t been able to decide what to get. I've had the stock fuel system from fuel pump to injectors up until this point so I know very little about what to upgrade to as the stock stuff was doing just fine on the old engine.

Also, I've been under the assumption just from reading through many different threads over the years that anything above 90% injector duty cycle is a bad thing and can cause injector failure or lean condition. But from what Gizmo and Bowtienut have stated that doesn't seem to be true. I’m thinking the 30lb injectors will be fine for me as well.
Old 01-12-2012, 07:55 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
draggin97s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i was thinking about sticking my stockers back in, turning the pressure up to around 50, re-tuning it and seeing if it'd work. Reason being i have a 36 lber sticking. So im gonna try it.

Last edited by draggin97s10; 01-12-2012 at 08:16 AM.
Old 01-12-2012, 09:01 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
 
05HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CT/NJ
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I thought this was an interesting video. I think what you guys are doing with these little injectors running WFO is making a huge cloud of fuel in the intake. Better atomization than they best new injectors.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGlav...eature=related
Old 01-12-2012, 09:16 PM
  #33  
TECH Resident
 
lt1slowz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 05HD
I thought this was an interesting video. I think what you guys are doing with these little injectors running WFO is making a huge cloud of fuel in the intake. Better atomization than they best new injectors.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGlav...eature=related
are you trying to say the stock multecs atomized better?



might wanna watch the video again.
Old 01-12-2012, 10:08 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
 
05HD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CT/NJ
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by lt1slowz28
are you trying to say the stock multecs atomized better?



might wanna watch the video again.
*sigh* It is guys like you that make me wonder why I even bother posting in here.

No matter what injector, it makes a big cloud when you run it wide open as opposed to just a cone at lower duty cycles.
Old 01-12-2012, 10:32 PM
  #35  
On The Tree
 
Uwilllosetomy93lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Personally, the 30lbr's should work fine, even with a wet kit.....provided the (more importantly)pump has been upgraded for the 200 shot. 36lbr's would also work OK, whereas the tune shouldnt be too bad to work out. The 42 lbr's would be a bit much to scale back, despite what others have heard or might have done, but can still get tuned into your set-up.....just easier to tune with good results on dyno with smaller injectors! Just my experience...
Old 01-12-2012, 10:39 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Rob94hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,662
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Any dyno or track results from switching to smaller injectors?
Old 01-13-2012, 12:59 AM
  #37  
TECH Resident
 
lt1slowz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, gizmo and bowtienut have both voiced their views... gizmo is pretty damn smart about his set up... but other than running the injector at it's max all of the time I feel more comfortable myself with my street/strip car on a bigger injector running the solenoid on a less intensive duty cycle.
Old 01-13-2012, 06:14 PM
  #38  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
GIZMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 2,780
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lt1slowz28
... but other than running the injector at it's max all of the time I feel more comfortable myself with my street/strip car on a bigger injector running the solenoid on a less intensive duty cycle.
How often is your street/strip car actually at WOT? One thing that you might want to consider is that too large injectors do not perform as well in low load situations. When we switched to 19 lb injectors in our stock internals build we gained a bunch in sixty foot. FYI, my SVO 24 lbs are not maxed out (50 psi). I am not saying that the OP needs to switch to 24 lbs. I am just trying to share what has worked for me. Buying a set of matched injectors is worth the extra money.
Old 01-13-2012, 06:49 PM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Rob94hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,662
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GIZMO
How often is your street/strip car actually at WOT? One thing that you might want to consider is that too large injectors do not perform as well in low load situations. When we switched to 19 lb injectors in our stock internals build we gained a bunch in sixty foot. FYI, my SVO 24 lbs are not maxed out (50 psi). I am not saying that the OP needs to switch to 24 lbs. I am just trying to share what has worked for me. Buying a set of matched injectors is worth the extra money.
Makes sense. After I'm done driving around town I smell the stench of raw fuel. Almost like I'm still running rich. Poor atomization at low rpms maybe?

So if I were to swap out smaller injectors would a fuel pressure regulater need to go with it?
Old 01-13-2012, 07:33 PM
  #40  
TECH Resident
 
lt1slowz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good thoughts gizmo... I wish injectors were as cheap as carb jets to play with and find the right combo... I may just try the injectors out of my mustang and see how they fair


Quick Reply: injectors?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM.