LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Lt1 cam choice for DD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2012, 02:01 AM
  #21  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1baddgarage
Hey everyone, I'm new here as this is my first LT1. I just picked up my 94 camaro Saturday, decided to get rid of my gutless 96 mustang gt. Never a fan of the 4.6. Anyways it already has Longtube headers, Off road Y, 3 inch exhaust, slp cold air. So I was looking at camming the car this summer. Its my daily, so nothing too radical, looking at the cc305 or cc503. I want enough power to pull on my brothers c5 (around mid 12s, 325-350rwhp), but still have stockish idle and decent mpg. I was leaning towards the cc305 for the idle quality but heard alot of people are disapointed with it. Which would be your reccomendation for a daily driver and why.
It's going to take more than 350rwhp to pull on a 350rwhp c5. They are lighter and more aerodynamic.

Originally Posted by gregrob
I've used that cam and other XFI cams with patriot dual and no issues at all...

They aren't even as aggressive as some of the modern LS street lobes with a 1.7 rocker.

I wouldn't use 918s though.
It's a good thing .006-.050 lobe lift is the only part of the lobe that matters for aggressiveness And I pitty the fool who actually would sacrifice a few hp for some spring life and reliability in a street car.
Old 02-08-2012, 02:22 AM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

It gives you a good idea to compare lobes, thats all.

A properly setup valve train will control XFI lobes and more aggressive with no issue. Like I said a lot of STREET lobes are more aggressive than the XFI but are still easily managed.

Now why dont you STFU and crawl back in your hole. Lay there and wait til someone else says something you can disagree with. It is ******* worthless when all someone EVER does is wait to pipe up about how wrong someone else is.

Why dont you try adding something useful to the discussion every now and then....?
Old 02-08-2012, 07:04 AM
  #23  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
1baddgarage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Jenison, Mi
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speed_demon24
It's going to take more than 350rwhp to pull on a 350rwhp c5. They are lighter and more aerodynamic.



It's a good thing .006-.050 lobe lift is the only part of the lobe that matters for aggressiveness And I pitty the fool who actually would sacrifice a few hp for some spring life and reliability in a street car.
That true, its an auto c5 with exhaust that'll run a high 12. So my goal is 325-350 rwhp, and mid 12s
Old 02-08-2012, 07:12 AM
  #24  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
1baddgarage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Jenison, Mi
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
My custom XFI 216 226 was dead reliable and made 340 rwhp with gobs of torque...

Just throwing that out there.
The xfi 466 is looking pretty good the more I research it. As long as I get a good valvetrain, and a good tune I should be set, correct? Also sidenote are you running stock injectors or 30's with that size cam?
Old 02-08-2012, 07:14 AM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
moehorsepower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,334
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

If you want a stockish idle, just make sure what ever cam you get has wide LSA min of 112 but it sounds like 114 LSA might be right for you..
Old 02-08-2012, 07:51 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
95mysticta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Sounds the OP wants to find something used and keep it on the cheap. CC503s are pretty hard to find used but thats something i would keep my eyes open for. You can piece together a LT4 Hotcam kit much cheaper then the CC503. Its all up to what you want and both will give you a noticeable bump over stock but just beware they are older technology and there are better options out there but you will have to buy new and fork out alot more cash.
Old 02-08-2012, 08:00 AM
  #27  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
ahritchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I had the Lunati Voodoo 60121 in my old cam only setup....very nice DD cam. It's similar to the Hot cam and cc503; except it's a newer design and has a bit more lift:

Part Number: 60121
Hydraulic roller, fair idle. Strong power increase in mildly modified engines with excellent throttle response. Will work with stock converter in 383 and up size engines or 2200 RPM stall speed converter in 305-350 cubic inch engines. Likes 3.23-3.73 rear gears. Also the largest cam for inboard/outboard marine applications.
Advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 270/278
Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 221/229
Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .515/.530
LSA/ICL: 112/106
Valve Lash (Int/Exh): Hyd/Hyd
RPM Range: 1800-5800
Old 02-08-2012, 08:12 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
95mysticta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

If buying new i love my LE1 Billet 223/230 .565/.565 112lsa. Great power band and great driveability. LE made this to compete with the CC503 and has similar characteristics but newer design and more lift.
Old 02-08-2012, 10:47 AM
  #29  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,038
Received 534 Likes on 386 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96lt1m6
LPE 211/219
Great cam if you are into stock sounding idle and a torque/power curve that behaves just like stock (only higher).
Old 02-08-2012, 11:25 AM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1baddgarage
The xfi 466 is looking pretty good the more I research it. As long as I get a good valvetrain, and a good tune I should be set, correct? Also sidenote are you running stock injectors or 30's with that size cam?
Stock will work fine. Don't do 30s
Old 02-08-2012, 12:11 PM
  #31  
BTC
TECH Fanatic
 
BTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lansing, MI via Bowling Green, KY, Dalton GA, Nashville, TN & Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,745
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

With regards to a cam, what does "lazy" mean?
Old 02-08-2012, 12:26 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

When I say lazy lobes I mean slow ramp rate, slow seat-to-seat time, mild lift, etc.
Old 02-08-2012, 12:59 PM
  #33  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Mystery Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,043
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I ran the XFI 280 for a couple years with the 918 springs. Took it up to 6800 RPM's, but when I got about 10k miles on the springs I started to get valve float. By the end of last year I had to turn my shift points down to 6100 RPM's to stop the float. Cam was great, awesome sound, great torque, and I ran it into mid 11's with home ported heads.
Old 02-08-2012, 01:02 PM
  #34  
BTC
TECH Fanatic
 
BTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lansing, MI via Bowling Green, KY, Dalton GA, Nashville, TN & Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,745
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
When I say lazy lobes I mean slow ramp rate, slow seat-to-seat time, mild lift, etc.
So, the opening and closing of the valves is not as abrupt as a cam that's not lazy?

Those might sound like stupid questions, but I don't know much about cams. I would like to know more because I might be interested in a mild cam some day.
Old 02-08-2012, 01:06 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I wouldn't call it abrupt that's exactly what you don't want in a lobe. Its just quicker
Old 02-08-2012, 01:07 PM
  #36  
BTC
TECH Fanatic
 
BTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lansing, MI via Bowling Green, KY, Dalton GA, Nashville, TN & Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,745
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

OK. Abrupt might have been a bad choice of words. Thanks.
Old 02-08-2012, 02:04 PM
  #37  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
1baddgarage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Jenison, Mi
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I shouldn't be spinning more than 6300 rpm, definetly not 6800 rpm. With the correct set of springs, will the springs last awhile or will I need to change them out to prevent valve float often? I drive around 15000 miles a year, so its going to see a lot of use
Old 02-08-2012, 04:04 PM
  #38  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (22)
 
camar0corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm daily driving with a 503, it's a lot of fun, trapped 113.5mph last time I was at the track, that was before I got retuned (still had my hotcam tune in, I picked up 15rwhp with the retune) and I was shifting at only 6200 due to having the wrong thing selected in EFI Live.

On the other hand I have a hotcam for sale, $80 shipped OBO. It has one flaw, but its on the back of the ramp, didn't damage the lifter at all, not even sure how it got there or why.

I also enjoyed my hotcam, trapped 110mph with it.
Old 02-08-2012, 04:30 PM
  #39  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It's not accurate to call a cam "hard on parts" without any reference to rpm range and valvetrain setup. If you float the valves, the harmonics kill the spring rate, and as a result float even sooner and eventually break from the harmonics. You could either run less duration (less needed rpm), lighten and stiffen the valvetrain for more high rpm stability, or throw more pressure at it and add further more flex and harmonics into the valvetrain.

I think it's odd that some can run an XFI grind to 7000 rpm with older 918 springs and aftermarket heads with larger and heavier valves, and some cant rev past 6300 without loss of control of stock size valves. I'd be willing to bet that the more successful guys actually took the time to setup their valvetrain correctly, rather than just slapping it all together.
Old 02-08-2012, 05:03 PM
  #40  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
I think it's odd that some can run an XFI grind to 7000 rpm with older 918 springs and aftermarket heads with larger and heavier valves, and some cant rev past 6300 without loss of control of stock size valves. I'd be willing to bet that the more successful guys actually took the time to setup their valvetrain correctly, rather than just slapping it all together.


I think using crappy stock style pushrods is an issue as well - most have not seen spintrons of a valvetrain at even 6,000 rpms. Even with modest spring pressures the stock style PRs look like spaghetti and put all sorts of nasty harmonics in the valvetrain.

$50 summit special PRs aren't going to cut it.

Take the time to get the right springs, with the right size and length pushrods, and properly installed rockers, and you will have a much more rewarding combo then someone running the same cam without doing their homework and slapping everything together.


Quick Reply: Lt1 cam choice for DD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.