LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Piston ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2012, 09:58 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
3DFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Piston ?

The compression distance is different in these pistons. I'm not sure what exactly they mean and which one to think would be the better choice.

http://www.summitracing.com/search/D...?Ns=Rank%7cAsc
Old 03-04-2012, 10:04 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
3DFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess the 4557 would be correct with stock crank
Old 03-04-2012, 10:05 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Compression height needed is dictated by stroke, rod length, and deck height.

If you tried to use a piston with a stock compression distance with a 6.0" rod on a 3.75" stroke the rings would come up past the deck of the block, or if you used a piston meant for a 5.700" rod stroker with a stock crank it would be half an inchish below the deck and make no compression atall.

So what crank and rods are you using?
Old 03-04-2012, 03:42 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
3DFORMULA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The stock crank, I was considering using this rod if the price is for a set.

http://www.competitionproducts.com/P...ctinfo/RP570P/
Old 03-04-2012, 05:45 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

If buying rods and pistons I would go to a 6.0" rod, makes the piston lighter which makes for less stress on the bottomend




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.