2014 lt1/4
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
2014 lt1/4 So us LT guys should read this. Makes me wonder if this LT1/4 section of LS1tech is going to be renovated?! Seems like the Gen V V8 is going to be named after our engines?! I can wait to tell my non LT1 buddies in 2014 that I have an LT1 in my Camaro. 
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...g-in-2015.html
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...g-in-2015.html
Last edited by 93Euphoria; Sep 24, 2012 at 06:03 PM.
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0
Brett Foote
LMAO! That's exactly what I thought only I wasn't as harsh about it.
I went on LTXtech on facebook and said the idea was "stupid" and popo got all hell bent about it. You guys should go there and post what you posted here.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/LTXTech/136582729757020
I went on LTXtech on facebook and said the idea was "stupid" and popo got all hell bent about it. You guys should go there and post what you posted here.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/LTXTech/136582729757020
I dont see how it will be confusing. When someone says they have a 350 in a 97 camaro or a 350 in a 69 camaro do you get confused?
the car companies do this crap all the time. So I dont see the big deal with it.
the car companies do this crap all the time. So I dont see the big deal with it.
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
LMAO! That's exactly what I thought only I wasn't as harsh about it.
I went on LTXtech on facebook and said the idea was "stupid" and popo got all hell bent about it. You guys should go there and post what you posted here.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/LTXTech/136582729757020
I went on LTXtech on facebook and said the idea was "stupid" and popo got all hell bent about it. You guys should go there and post what you posted here.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/LTXTech/136582729757020
I thought the same thing. What does it really matter or am I missing something?
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Because not many people are rocking the old lt1 but when this motor comes out you will have to explain I have the 90's lt1. It's not a BIG deal but it should have its own name. Hell I've had people come to buy lt1 parts (even when I post pics and dates) I show up and say that dosnt look like my lt1, looking for sbc parts.
Same confusion happened when the Ls6 and Ls7 came out brought many of us back to the 1970 Ls6 454 Chevelle.
It seems to me that GM likes to rename the NEW engines that proved themselves from the past......
It seems to me that GM likes to rename the NEW engines that proved themselves from the past......
People that get confused will probably be the same people that get confused when they go to change their own oil.
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
"O you got one of those optispark things"
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 2
From: Nebraska
It's not really a HUGE deal but I do think it's annoying that GM can't just make a new name for them. I think enough time has passed for the old folks to know there is a difference between an LT-1 and an LT1 but it's still annoying when you have to explain it.