355 LT1 24x finally dyno tuned.
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
355 LT1 24x finally dyno tuned.
Finally got my 97 trans am to rpm for a tune. Results kind of surprise me a bit. It put down 423 rwhp at 6800 368 rwtq at 5700. Torque was within a few ft lbs from 4000 to 6200. Car pulls real hard to 7k. Maybe I can get it to test n tune Sunday and see what its made of.
#5
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Cam is an AI grind. 228/235 .613/.613 108 LSA. I ported the heads. I put 5/16 guide liners in the stock lt1 guides and resized them for 8mm stemmed valves. The whole valvetrain in the heads was from a set of competition AFR small block ford heads that a fella ordered for hyd roller instead solid roller. Picked up valves springs cups retainers and keepers for 100 bucks. Its PAC dual springs. Heads measured 182cc and flowed around 270 iirc. C/R is 11.3 with a .022 quench (yea I know that's tight) but it works. All forged bottom end. Ls7 lifters.
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Cam is an AI grind. 228/235 .613/.613 108 LSA. I ported the heads. I put 5/16 guide liners in the stock lt1 guides and resized them for 8mm stemmed valves. The whole valvetrain in the heads was from a set of competition AFR small block ford heads that a fella ordered for hyd roller instead solid roller. Picked up valves springs cups retainers and keepers for 100 bucks. Its PAC dual springs. Heads measured 182cc and flowed around 270 iirc. C/R is 11.3 with a .022 quench (yea I know that's tight) but it works. All forged bottom end. Ls7 lifters.
Have fun with it!
#7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
That's fantastic!
Great job with those heads!
M6 I assume?
STD correction?
Looks like the same cam I have. My peaks were 4600(tq) and 6400(hp).
11.3 CR is not low at all. In fact, if it's a daily driver, it gives you some buffer for varying fuel quality. What total timing did it want?
Honestly, I don't believe that quench number is right. It would be tagging the heads at 7k. Did you possibly mistype, meaning .032"?
Great job with those heads!
M6 I assume?
STD correction?
Looks like the same cam I have. My peaks were 4600(tq) and 6400(hp).
11.3 CR is not low at all. In fact, if it's a daily driver, it gives you some buffer for varying fuel quality. What total timing did it want?
Honestly, I don't believe that quench number is right. It would be tagging the heads at 7k. Did you possibly mistype, meaning .032"?
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Quench is indeed .022. I build engines everyday so checking the piston at pin axis on both sides is standard practice. Been back into it before. Pistons were clean but no touching. This car is an a4 car with a 3500 vigilante. Was locked during pulls. Also I just noticed the last pull he made he set timing at 35 which brought my peak torque down to 5200 which makes more since. Car was making 350 ft lbs of torque by 3300 rpm
Last edited by wht97ws6ta; 04-05-2014 at 03:13 PM. Reason: addition
#12
Wow, awesome build wht97. It nice to read a success story on the forum here once in a while. Dont read many using tight LSA like 108 anymore with more modern head designs - seems to work well for u. Can u tell me 'bout the vlv guide boss? Did u have trim them down for that lift? Or are those longer vlv stems?
What are u using for bottom end? Id like to guess u have longer rods in there. Please let us hear the entire recipe - dont leave us hang'n.
Congrats,
cardo
What are u using for bottom end? Id like to guess u have longer rods in there. Please let us hear the entire recipe - dont leave us hang'n.
Congrats,
cardo
#13
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep run some Gas from around here (NW Oklahoma) and you'll run a little more tolerant compression. I wish we had good fuel around here all I can get on a regular basis is 91.
Nice numbers. I'll bet that thing will move.
Nice numbers. I'll bet that thing will move.
#15
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Wow, awesome build wht97. It nice to read a success story on the forum here once in a while. Dont read many using tight LSA like 108 anymore with more modern head designs - seems to work well for u. Can u tell me 'bout the vlv guide boss? Did u have trim them down for that lift? Or are those longer vlv stems?
What are u using for bottom end? Id like to guess u have longer rods in there. Please let us hear the entire recipe - dont leave us hang'n.
Congrats,
cardo
What are u using for bottom end? Id like to guess u have longer rods in there. Please let us hear the entire recipe - dont leave us hang'n.
Congrats,
cardo
#16
That is some awfully tight quench, keep her clean cuz once you get some carbon on those pistons and valves they may start kissing at 7k rpms.
Very nice results though!
Very nice results though!
#17
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Yea some times you will get some slight contact with that close of quench but I've never seen it to be detrimental. I've set heads up to resurface that had some contact from to close of quench and put a .001 skim cut and never really seen the decks cave any. Not saying it wouldn't if you got really carried away with it. My 400 I built a l while back was around .030 and it would make contact but that was a stock crank with a scat pro comp 6.125 I beam rod. Oh and for who asked about the rod length in my lt1 they are 5.7 factory length. Forgot to add in the last post that I cut the top off my intake in the band saw to gain better access and welded it back on. So intake got a lot of attention
#20
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Yea its funny how a lot of people get hung on the LSA numbers. You hear some say they will be hard to tune. The fact of the matter is the degrees of overlap is what really needs to catch the attention. You can have longer durations and wider LSA that result in the same degrees of overlap that may not be any easier to tune.