LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

4l60e or th350?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2014, 02:38 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
anywereiroam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The rockies
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought a 95 z28 with a blown lt1. So I decided to rebuild it with forged rods, forged pistons, ported heads, lt headers with intentions of a power adder.

I finally got the car running and the transmission is crapping out. It does not shift at wot. Revvs up high and the fluid smells burnt.

So it is in need of a rebuild. Now my concern is if i plan on a power adder am I better of switching over to a th350? one of the reasons is it's a lot cheaper to build and reliability. I drive the car to work which is 5miles round trip. Other then that I would just be using it to attend car shows, track, and those late night highway runs. I am shooting for more then 400whp.

Am I better of switching over to a th350 that is properly built. I know I'll lose over drive and kill my mpg but I did not build this car for fuel economy. The car will be driven hard!

Or save up some more and stick with the 4l60 and have it rebuilt?

Last edited by anywereiroam; 09-05-2014 at 02:43 AM.
Old 09-05-2014, 08:30 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
93M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by anywereiroam
I bought a 95 z28 with a blown lt1. So I decided to rebuild it with forged rods, forged pistons, ported heads, lt headers with intentions of a power adder.

I finally got the car running and the transmission is crapping out. It does not shift at wot. Revvs up high and the fluid smells burnt.

So it is in need of a rebuild. Now my concern is if i plan on a power adder am I better of switching over to a th350? one of the reasons is it's a lot cheaper to build and reliability. I drive the car to work which is 5miles round trip. Other then that I would just be using it to attend car shows, track, and those late night highway runs. I am shooting for more then 400whp.

Am I better of switching over to a th350 that is properly built. I know I'll lose over drive and kill my mpg but I did not build this car for fuel economy. The car will be driven hard!

Or save up some more and stick with the 4l60 and have it rebuilt?
If you want to go with a 3-speed, I would much rather do a TH400.
Old 09-05-2014, 08:46 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
SwampWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 93M6Formula
If you want to go with a 3-speed, I would much rather do a TH400.
IMHO a TH400 will eat up a considerable amount of HP. Especially because his goal is around 400rwhp. To me a 350 will be a lot better if you are doing track more than street. a 350 eats less hp than a 4L60e too. 350 has pretty gearing as well. But as far as highway runs you should stick 4L60e
Old 09-05-2014, 09:14 AM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
anywereiroam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The rockies
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I also thought maybe it would be cheaper to rebuild the 4l60 myself? Download a step by step guide and try it. I've never rebuilt a transmission but I figured I have to learn eventually. Unless I should just send it out.
Old 09-05-2014, 09:15 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

With only 400rwhp at the dragstrip you are still going to need gearing for a hard launch, with a TH350 you get less first gear multiplication and no lockup meaning you are going to probably keep the stall lower again hurting launch.

For a 5mile commute I wouldn't worry about OD but the lack of lockup causing conservative stall selection is going to suck.

If aiming for enough power that the 3.06 first gear of the 4L60E is not an advantage then I would be quicker to consider a TH350.

My car would not be anywhere near as quick with a TH350 because the 3.06first/4.10axle /3800stall are what make the 1.5 60ft happen. With a TH350 I would have a lesser first gear and likely run less stall, endup with 1.7 60ft times and barely be in the 11s rather than being at the point where I have to consider a rollbar to go any faster.

People focus on the OD being the only major difference with the TH350, I just want to point out the other two big factors so you make a decision on more complete picture on the potential minuses.

If I were building a fast NA primarily track car I definitely would consider the TH350, easier rebuilds lots of trick liteweight parts etc. the first to second ratio difference of the TH350 makes it easier to keep the engine in the powerband too. With a 4L60E you endup overrevving first a little to keep the rpm up going into second.
Old 09-05-2014, 09:55 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I'm reading this as you want something to cover a power adder setup which should be FAR in excess of 400 whp. Keeping a 4L60E behind that won't be cheap nor trouble-free.
So, then it depends on priorities. Are you willing to spend the money every season or two to keep a TH350 behind a healthy power adder setup just to go .1 sec quicker, or would you be okay with giving up that tenth and going with the extra durability of a TH400 that almost anyone can build?
I don't see anybody going really fast with a TH350 and doing it cheaply.

If only 400 rwhp is your target, then I'd just get a QUALITY-built 4L60E.

I agree with 96caprice; for any converter you would choose to run good ET's, the loss of lockup is a bigger deal than loss of the overdrive ratio.
What rear gear ratio will you run?

Last edited by bowtienut; 09-05-2014 at 10:03 AM.
Old 09-05-2014, 10:44 AM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
anywereiroam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The rockies
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Right now I currently have 3.27. But I think the 400 is going to be my choice. I'd rather have the durability. I'm not a serious racer I just want to have some weekend fun. I'm going to assume that cost wise it will cost me as much as it did when I went from the 700r4 to the th400 in my third gen.
Old 09-05-2014, 10:51 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtienut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bright, IN
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

It just dawned on me that you're probably running the little 7.6" rearend. Any plans to change that? If not, then I don't think the 4L60E would be your weak link.
3.27 gears and non-lockup are gonna suck; and until you get a power adder on there, will also be slow without the deep 3.06 gear of the 4L60E
Old 09-05-2014, 11:07 AM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
anywereiroam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The rockies
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes the 10 bolt will be replaced for an aftermarket. My plan was to start from engine, to trans to rear end before any power adders, unless I'm looking at it the wrong way. I've never built a car for this sort of thing so I'm sort of trying to see if I'm headed in the right track.
Old 09-05-2014, 12:22 PM
  #10  
Man-Crush Warning
iTrader: (1)
 
Shownomercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,150
Received 119 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

Put a glide in it.



Quick Reply: 4l60e or th350?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.