LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

My new 96 z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 07:47 AM
  #21  
JOHNNYMO's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Colorado is as follows

regular unleaded- 85
mid grade-87
premium-91
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 08:32 AM
  #22  
smitty2919's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by bufmatmuslepants
Put it on a dyno or take it to the track and lets see what it's really doing. Ill say...330rwhp and 13.4 1/4 mile just from what I can see and you've said.
If that becomes true, I'd be pissed with that number of 330 of of a FI car LOL. I have 311/346 on my Full exhaust and dyno tune 95 Z28 M6 lol.

I hope this works out for you. Seems be to a lot of "unknowns" and quirky information about this car having a supercharger installed.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 10:06 AM
  #23  
bufmatmuslepants's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,280
Likes: 49
From: Hampstead, NC
Default

Only one way to tell, but breathing through stock exhaust manifolds and no intercooler with a questionable fuel system and tune puts my guess where it is. Only one way to find out, take it to the track and see your mph or a dyno pull.

Go get some baselines in now then do it again after you fix that stuff. Then post back and well tell you how to fix it and get the real potential out of it.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 10:36 AM
  #24  
ahritchie's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Default

You might as well go buy some longtube headers right now (and good gaskets) why bother troubleshooting an exhaust leak on POS stock manifolds. A blown LT1 needs to breathe...I wouldn't be suprised for it to pick up 40+ HP with the supercharger factored in. Then look into tuning, fuel system, intercooler/SC upgrades to make more reliable and add HP. A SC 383 it is being completely choked off by those manifolds; those are inadequate on a cam only setup...much less stroker+ power adder HP level.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 12:21 PM
  #25  
93M6Formula's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 2
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by ahritchie
You might as well go buy some longtube headers right now (and good gaskets) why bother troubleshooting an exhaust leak on POS stock manifolds. A blown LT1 needs to breathe...I wouldn't be suprised for it to pick up 40+ HP with the supercharger factored in. Then look into tuning, fuel system, intercooler/SC upgrades to make more reliable and add HP. A SC 383 it is being completely choked off by those manifolds; those are inadequate on a cam only setup...much less stroker+ power adder HP level.
At this point i'd be surprised if it even has ported heads...
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 07:20 PM
  #26  
3Whips's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

No, Iowa lol. And I'm not a chevy guy i couldn't tell you if they're stock manifolds.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 10:23 PM
  #27  
Catmaigne's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 25
From: Conshohocken, PA
Default

Originally Posted by 3Whips
No, Iowa lol. And I'm not a chevy guy i couldn't tell you if they're stock manifolds.
Wat. 99.9999999% of manifolds are cast. This has nothing to do with Chevy.
Do they look like this?

Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 10:52 PM
  #28  
SS RRR's Avatar
Village Troll
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 596
From: Jackstandican
Default

Originally Posted by JOHNNYMO
Colorado is as follows

regular unleaded- 85
mid grade-87
premium-91
Denver too? I don't remember, but am wondering if 91 is offered up in the mountains...
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 10:53 PM
  #29  
TMTMTL's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque New mexico
Default

need for speed underground paint!?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2014 | 10:55 PM
  #30  
TMTMTL's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque New mexico
Default

SS RRR, high altitude in albuquerque is same.. 91 premium. same altitude as denver. they run 91.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 09:23 AM
  #31  
fbody_brian's Avatar
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 419
Likes: 4
From: Long Beach, MS
Default

Originally Posted by 3Whips
No, Iowa lol. And I'm not a car guy i couldn't tell you if they're stock manifolds.
there, fixed that for you
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 11:35 AM
  #32  
3Whips's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by fbody_brian
there, fixed that for you
Lmao no you didnt you acted like an *** hole, they're not stock headers. And no I know quite a lot about cars I just dont care for Chevy, Ford is better, and I'm not biased i own a dodge stealth, camaro, and mustang. I work on them all.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 12:10 PM
  #33  
3Whips's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by TMTMTL
need for speed underground paint!?
LOL I haven't played that game in forever! That was on the ps2 and xbox wasnt it?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 12:15 PM
  #34  
3Whips's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by Catmaigne
Wat. 99.9999999% of manifolds are cast. This has nothing to do with Chevy.
Do they look like this?

Nope they do not, and I never thought the headers were stock until you guys kept going on about them. I'll post a pic of them soon.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 12:31 PM
  #35  
3Whips's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default




Ya don't think they're stock








Sorry bad picture doesn't show all of it
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 12:34 PM
  #36  
3Whips's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

It wouldn't make sense for this guy to build this all up and not change out the headers.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 01:27 PM
  #37  
ahritchie's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte NC
Default

Originally Posted by 3Whips
It wouldn't make sense for this guy to build this all up and not change out the headers.
You are correct...those ARE headers, not manifolds upon closer inspection. You would be surprised at some of the things people do that don't make any sense at all around here....Like a Mustang/Mopar lover buying a LT1 Camaro of all things! Or this one time some crazy dude started posting on a GM based forum claiming "Ford is better".

Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 01:31 PM
  #38  
3Whips's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by ahritchie
You are correct...those ARE headers, not manifolds upon closer inspection. You would be surprised at some of the things people do that don't make any sense at all around here....Like a Mustang/Mopar lover buying a LT1 Camaro of all things! Or this time some crazy dude started posting on a GM based forum claiming "Ford is better".

My opinion, you have your's I still respect Chevy, but it is not my favorite. My favorite is Ford, then Mopar and then probably GM.

My Uncle was a body man, he's heavily into Mopar.

Are the current headers acceptable for this build? Or should I get better ones?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 01:38 PM
  #39  
Alex94TAGT's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Default

Those are indeed aftermarket headers -- not stock exhaust manifolds. They just happen to retain the factory emissions equipment (secondary air injection at least), which isn't surprising on a California-based car. They should be fine.

Can you see any model numbers on the Paxton head unit? 8~9psi on a 383 isn't shabby for an older Paxton. If I knew the pulley sizes and step-up ratio, we could calculate the impeller speed to see if you're overspinning it at all, but it's probably not a terrible idea to rebuild it with fresh bearings either way.

Despite not knowing all of the specifics, I'd run 91 (premium) at minimum, preferably higher if available. Don't want to run cheap fuel, being non-intercooled. Your compression, final ignition timing and IATs will have a large effect on when detonation hits.

I like the paint.

Originally Posted by MEAN LT1
I think I see "Versa Fueler" You have three Big injectors in front of the throttle body to help with the fuel needs of the motor.
You mean Superfueler. The Superfueler came with the Paxtons and added the extra injectors up front. Versafueler is a peak-and-hold driver box for 8 low-z injectors on the rail (which would otherwise fry the PCM drivers due to excessive current).
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2014 | 03:08 PM
  #40  
3Whips's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by Alex94TAGT
Those are indeed aftermarket headers -- not stock exhaust manifolds. They just happen to retain the factory emissions equipment (secondary air injection at least), which isn't surprising on a California-based car. They should be fine.

Can you see any model numbers on the Paxton head unit? 8~9psi on a 383 isn't shabby for an older Paxton. If I knew the pulley sizes and step-up ratio, we could calculate the impeller speed to see if you're overspinning it at all, but it's probably not a terrible idea to rebuild it with fresh bearings either way.

Despite not knowing all of the specifics, I'd run 91 (premium) at minimum, preferably higher if available. Don't want to run cheap fuel, being non-intercooled. Your compression, final ignition timing and IATs will have a large effect on when detonation hits.

I like the paint.



You mean Superfueler. The Superfueler came with the Paxtons and added the extra injectors up front. Versafueler is a peak-and-hold driver box for 8 low-z injectors on the rail (which would otherwise fry the PCM drivers due to excessive current).
SN2000 is the supercharger model i believe
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.