Running very lean w/ Data log
"Symptom- Exhaust burning eyes. Injector data incorrect or VE/MAF table is off. Investigate- car running lean."
My car is spitting out some intense exhaust fumes, my buddy and me found out one night while the garage door was only partially opened, attempting to not wake the neighbors
Heres a log that you should be able to see what im talking about. I appreciate any help.
https://www.mediafire.com/?yvhfj328xfk86rr
Last edited by Kumaro95; May 23, 2015 at 01:15 PM.
As for the lean/rich condition (you have both), you'll need to fine tune the tune some more. But, it's all within the computers adjustable range so it's not necessary.
Can you list your mods? 60kPa at 975rpm seems like you have a fairly aggressive cam no? This helps us know what we are seeing vs what we should be.
Unless this log isn't indicative of an actual lean condition where the car is running leaner than this log indicates?
As for the lean/rich condition (you have both), you'll need to fine tune the tune some more. But, it's all within the computers adjustable range so it's not necessary.
Can you list your mods? 60kPa at 975rpm seems like you have a fairly aggressive cam no? This helps us know what we are seeing vs what we should be.
Unless this log isn't indicative of an actual lean condition where the car is running leaner than this log indicates?

As for my engine mods,
blocks been bored .030 over so its a 355
Heads are Lloyd LE2 w/ ported intake + 58mm TB
cam 231/239/.571/.587/110
LPP headers + Y-pipe to magna flow catback
Bosch Green #42's
Forged weisco pistons with scat forged rods running on stock crank
compression should be very close to if it isnt 11.8
SLP CAI

As for my engine mods,
blocks been bored .030 over so its a 355
Heads are Lloyd LE2 w/ ported intake + 58mm TB
cam 231/239/.571/.587/110
LPP headers + Y-pipe to magna flow catback
Bosch Green #42's
Forged weisco pistons with scat forged rods running on stock crank
compression should be very close to if it isnt 11.8
SLP CAI
How have you been adjusting the AFR? Are you using the MAF calibrations or VE tables? What program are you using to tune it, Tunercats or Tuner Pro RT?
Trending Topics
How have you been adjusting the AFR? Are you using the MAF calibrations or VE tables? What program are you using to tune it, Tunercats or Tuner Pro RT?
Last edited by Kumaro95; May 24, 2015 at 10:27 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Last edited by hrcslam; May 25, 2015 at 01:00 AM.
Let me know how it does. If this attachment doesn't open for you, PM your e-mail address and I'll e-mail it to you.
Last edited by hrcslam; May 25, 2015 at 01:46 PM.
Let me know how it does. If this attachment doesn't open for you, PM your e-mail address and I'll e-mail it to you.
The VE tables will not be exactly the same. I have more advance than you do in the Cam. And I'm on a stock TB and intake (unported). You'll have more flow as the RPM's increase, but likely more reverb at lower RPMs. So you'll need to adjust the VE table slightly here and there. Use your data logs. Since it's in SD mode you won't have the MAF fighting your VE table adjustments (this is debatable, the PCM should ignore the VE tables in MAF mode but I've noticed differences in the VE tables effect drivability in MAF mode personally). Once the VE tables are dialed in you can calibrate the MAF during your Dyno tune.
I haven't been able to go over 100% on the VE tables, but in the area's of more than 100% VE it's all in PE mode anyway. So the extra fueling needed there was tuned in via the PE mode tables. There's a couple other ways to do this too (like increasing your displacement and reducing the VE tables to make the computer think the engine is bigger). You should be over 100% VE with your build at peak TQ and HP. IIRC, I'm close to 105-109% VE.
To play it safe, you can go to the PE tables and increase the fueling there by another 5% or so then lean it back down once it goes on the dyno. If you have a wideband, then you can just log it and adjust as needed. You really don't need a Dyno tune if you have a track and a wideband, but you won't know how much power you're putting down either and it takes longer.
Don't forget I pulled timing (mostly in the cruising RPM range), so you can add it back in until you get knock retard then pull it back out as needed.
The VE tables will not be exactly the same. I have more advance than you do in the Cam. And I'm on a stock TB and intake (unported). You'll have more flow as the RPM's increase, but likely more reverb at lower RPMs. So you'll need to adjust the VE table slightly here and there. Use your data logs. Since it's in SD mode you won't have the MAF fighting your VE table adjustments (this is debatable, the PCM should ignore the VE tables in MAF mode but I've noticed differences in the VE tables effect drivability in MAF mode personally). Once the VE tables are dialed in you can calibrate the MAF during your Dyno tune.
I haven't been able to go over 100% on the VE tables, but in the area's of more than 100% VE it's all in PE mode anyway. So the extra fueling needed there was tuned in via the PE mode tables. There's a couple other ways to do this too (like increasing your displacement and reducing the VE tables to make the computer think the engine is bigger). You should be over 100% VE with your build at peak TQ and HP. IIRC, I'm close to 105-109% VE.
To play it safe, you can go to the PE tables and increase the fueling there by another 5% or so then lean it back down once it goes on the dyno. If you have a wideband, then you can just log it and adjust as needed. You really don't need a Dyno tune if you have a track and a wideband, but you won't know how much power you're putting down either and it takes longer.
Don't forget I pulled timing (mostly in the cruising RPM range), so you can add it back in until you get knock retard then pull it back out as needed.
Also, if you don't already have one, get an IR temp gun. You'll need it to adjust individual injector trims at idle and low rpm. It'll help a lot.
Last edited by hrcslam; May 27, 2015 at 03:55 AM.

