383 lt1 build going forward!
Thanks guys!
Your machinist wants the rotating assembly first so he can do some clearancing for rod bolts and pistons for boring.
What do you want to do with this engine? Street NA? Solid roller? Spray?
The general recommendation is a 4340 crank, 4340 rods with 7/16" ARPs, and forged pistons, but details like H/I beam/rod length/piston alloy depend on app. Scat or Eagle and Mahles will get it done for most people.
Do you mean 500 at the wheels or flywheel?
Flywheel can be done on a stock displacement H/C setup pretty easily. If you meant at the wheels then you're out of luck, even with added displacement and if your car is a m6. Not really doable on this platform.
If you're m6 then shoot for 450rwhp with a moderate sized cam (high 220s - low 240s duration). This is assuming the work on those 190s was any good. Pray that they flow as well as LE2s because there are a lot of small time "porters" out there who will take your money and leave you with shiny heads that look good but don't make HP. You will also want to bump compression up to mid 11s to 12:1 if 93 octane is readily available. The supporting mods like long tubes, catback, injectors, etc. all apply. No point in dumping a bunch of money into a 383 just to choke it. You will also need gears... that will also make your 10 bolt more likely to blow up if you have traction.
Trending Topics
If you're m6 then shoot for 450rwhp with a moderate sized cam (high 220s - low 240s duration). This is assuming the work on those 190s was any good. Pray that they flow as well as LE2s because there are a lot of small time "porters" out there who will take your money and leave you with shiny heads that look good but don't make HP. You will also want to bump compression up to mid 11s to 12:1 if 93 octane is readily available. The supporting mods like long tubes, catback, injectors, etc. all apply. No point in dumping a bunch of money into a 383 just to choke it. You will also need gears... that will also make your 10 bolt more likely to blow up if you have traction.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
That cam is probably way too big for those heads and will drive like crap. It might make the highest peak hp but the power/torque curves would suffer and there would be a ton of cam surge. The only way to really know is to have them flowed with another head as a reference, but if the port work was done by a nobody then I wouldn't have too much faith in them.
The 12 bolt is an alright rear but the pinion really gets beat up in a stick car with traction. They can get noisy. The 9" or s60 is a better option (although they consume more power).
Also, the 93 t56 isn't as strong as later years because of 1st gear. It has a lower torque rating than 94-97.
Far as the AFR 190s even AFR lovers will tell you not worthwhile even with milder goals.
They look good at a car show though.
I would have it nicely painted and cleaned up while you are at it too. Could even glyptol the lifter valley.
I would have it nicely painted and cleaned up while you are at it too. Could even glyptol the lifter valley.







