LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

iron heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2005 | 04:20 PM
  #1  
zjimbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Question iron heads

today , i picked up some misc lt1 parts for cheap and among the parts is a set of 12554290 iron heads.I was just woundering some of the pros and cons of these heads? and if anyone ever uses them.







jim
Old 09-27-2005 | 05:45 PM
  #2  
Hambone 7's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
From: Chattanoga TN
Default

thats what all the impala guys run, stock anyways. I think they have a slower heat dissipation rate than aluminum lt1 heads meaning more heat soak, I'm not sure of any other cons...
Old 09-27-2005 | 07:24 PM
  #3  
superGMman's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: San Leandro(basically Oakland), CA
Default

Their Heavier. They not only soak up heat faster, but stay hot longer(dissapate heat slower)
Old 09-27-2005 | 08:53 PM
  #4  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 12
Default

How little do you guys know and why do you insist on sharing?
Iron soaks up heat SLOWER, aluminum is actually a worse material from this standpoint because it takes heat from the chamber and puts it into the cooling system where it is waste instead of being used to expand the combustion gasses and drive the piston down. Not saying irons are the best just that neither of you has any good info presented on actual pros or cons.
They flow MORE than all but the 96-7 aluminums and as well as those, meaning Bandit that those heads that are so bad flow more than what is on your car. On the downside they weight 45lbs or so more FOR THE PAIR and have pressed in rocker studs as opposed to the aluminums screwin, the irons also need a bit of pushrod slot clearancing for use with high lifts.

On the old compression argument aluminum does allow more compression BUT due to the fact it saps heat out of the chamber it also REQUIRES more compression just to equal irons power. Now it may allow a full point more but then only need half that to make up for the thermal differences I have seen no real data on that part so the compression thing may or may not be a net gain in the end.

The way iron transfers heat more slowly also means it would transfer less heat to the intake charge as it passes through the ports and that less exhaust heat would be expelled rather than soaked up in the ports.

I am in no way saying everyone should switch to iron heads just that they do have some advantages as do aluminums and each has it's uses as well as MOST arguments made against them are pure ignorance. Machining the irons for screwin studs can be a little expensive and is one reason many switch to PORTED aluminums when swapping cams. Stock for stock from either to either would be a mistake and I know someone who made the swap to stock 96 Vette heads ASSuming they would be a performance gain. Only after he got no gain did he research it and find his mistake.

Also browse a b-body board once and tell me how many head gasket failures you see as compared to with the f-bodies, VERY low numbers I can only think of one or two in the nearly 5 years I have been active on the two main b-body boards, be it the differnt thinner gasket the better expansion match with the iron block iron head combo, or just the iron retains clamp load better either way one less problem we have to deal with that you guys do.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.