Elliot's flow results
Juicedz or T/ALT1 you guys need a BETTER intake to take advantage of those High flowing heads Guys, I actually have my Super Vic done from Bret Bauer if you guys are interested, I have over 1650 in the setup an I will let it go For Hundreds LESS. I need the money for my procharger kit, lol.
I would try to sell you guys my heads but ya already have some like mine, lol.
Evaporate LE LT1 heads will Generally flow about 25-30 CFM less on the intake and exhuast than Ported AFR's from LE with the 2.05 or 2.08 intake valve. REMEMBER its not just the Flow I would be worried more about Port Shape and Cross section in the head. EVEN if an LT1 head peaked at the same CFM it would only pull to about 5900 RPM opposed to These type of AFR and Trickflow's with more port shap that would pull to 6700 or so. BIG Difference.
I would try to sell you guys my heads but ya already have some like mine, lol.
Evaporate LE LT1 heads will Generally flow about 25-30 CFM less on the intake and exhuast than Ported AFR's from LE with the 2.05 or 2.08 intake valve. REMEMBER its not just the Flow I would be worried more about Port Shape and Cross section in the head. EVEN if an LT1 head peaked at the same CFM it would only pull to about 5900 RPM opposed to These type of AFR and Trickflow's with more port shap that would pull to 6700 or so. BIG Difference.
They look similar to my LT4 LE flow #'s
They flow slightly better on the ex. side.
My#'s
2 136/108
.3 194/139
.4 238/168
.5 273/183
.6 285/195
.650 286/201
Mine are stock LT4 valves
They flow slightly better on the ex. side.
My#'s
2 136/108
.3 194/139
.4 238/168
.5 273/183
.6 285/195
.650 286/201
Mine are stock LT4 valves
Originally Posted by T/A KID
Evaporate LE LT1 heads will Generally flow about 25-30 CFM less on the intake and exhuast than Ported AFR's from LE with the 2.05 or 2.08 intake valve. REMEMBER its not just the Flow I would be worried more about Port Shape and Cross section in the head. EVEN if an LT1 head peaked at the same CFM it would only pull to about 5900 RPM opposed to These type of AFR and Trickflow's with more port shap that would pull to 6700 or so. BIG Difference.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,023
Likes: 6
From: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
sorry I was away guys
Yes those were on a 6.6L stroker with our Proto type Intake. The intake seemed to make a ton of differeance in drivability, some thing we did not expect to be honest but seemed to realy shine on the Dyno
I just got my car running also. a set of LE-X heads(210cc intake stock castings) with the other proto-type intake. The intakes are not cheap but I have the design fairly worked out now. the next one shou;ld go fairly fast and easy. uses Modified stock fuel rails and all stock parts.
here is the first design
It sure sounds wicked that is for sure. my baby 240/247 112 cam has just a hair of idle...no really
BTW the 6.6L 448 car should pick up some more power soon. it was peaking early. stock lifters were originaly choosen and it looks like they are giving up early Comp "R"s are next on the list!
Yes those were on a 6.6L stroker with our Proto type Intake. The intake seemed to make a ton of differeance in drivability, some thing we did not expect to be honest but seemed to realy shine on the Dyno
I just got my car running also. a set of LE-X heads(210cc intake stock castings) with the other proto-type intake. The intakes are not cheap but I have the design fairly worked out now. the next one shou;ld go fairly fast and easy. uses Modified stock fuel rails and all stock parts.
here is the first design
It sure sounds wicked that is for sure. my baby 240/247 112 cam has just a hair of idle...no really
BTW the 6.6L 448 car should pick up some more power soon. it was peaking early. stock lifters were originaly choosen and it looks like they are giving up early
Comp "R"s are next on the list! 
