LT1 even worth modding?
I was regreting the lt1 buildup up untill dec when they came up with a whole new set of rules for e testing cars up here. As of 2006 anything 1998 and newer has to be pluged into mto computer for the emission test so that pretty much ends the serious modding of ls1s here.
John
the pros. of LT1 are:
- bad *** torque band.
- no matter what, it will always sound throatier and deeper than LS1
- Cast Iron Block means butload of spray on stock bottom end
- messing with the intake mani and heads will do ALOT because that's where it lags
everytime i raced a LS1 in my LT1.. stock for stock i had about 1/2 car to 1 car till top of 2nd and then they slowly creep away.. lol
My car should be at 400 rwhp or so when I get it back together (through an auto), run mid-high 11s, and I honestly don't know what I'll do after that. It'll take big bucks to do anything after this to produce more power.
single plain intake converson: $1500+
SBC head conversion: I have no idea, probably well over $500 just to convert the head to reverse flow
forced induction: $4000+
Nitrous could find its way on there, but I don't like the stuff.
HOWEVER, that is not gonna make me get an LS1. My car sounds much better than an LT1 and IMO looks pretty damn good. Plus I already have this car!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
My car should be at 400 rwhp or so when I get it back together (through an auto), run mid-high 11s, and I honestly don't know what I'll do after that. It'll take big bucks to do anything after this to produce more power.
single plain intake converson: $1500+
SBC head conversion: I have no idea, probably well over $500 just to convert the head to reverse flow
forced induction: $4000+
Nitrous could find its way on there, but I don't like the stuff.
HOWEVER, that is not gonna make me get an LS1. My car sounds much better than an LT1 and IMO looks pretty damn good. Plus I already have this car!
My car should be at 400 rwhp or so when I get it back together (through an auto), run mid-high 11s, and I honestly don't know what I'll do after that. It'll take big bucks to do anything after this to produce more power.
single plain intake converson: $1500+
SBC head conversion: I have no idea, probably well over $500 just to convert the head to reverse flow
forced induction: $4000+
Nitrous could find its way on there, but I don't like the stuff.
HOWEVER, that is not gonna make me get an LS1. My car sounds much better than an LT1 and IMO looks pretty damn good. Plus I already have this car!
Its not as hard as you guys think. I have GM LT4 heads, and lt4 intake. I make 476 rwhp in a 355. Stock crank, stock block, good rods/pistons with a solid roller. This is through a 9" and 4.71 gears. It does take more thought but you donn't have to start converting to SBC stuff. I'm actually doing something that may give me in the 490s rwhp. It can be done, you just have to try alittle harder. We've had some 430+ rwhp hyd roller cars down here and a 452 rwhp Hyd roller, ported lt1 heads/intake with a stock bottem end.
As they say "LT1s make you confident, LS1s make you cocky."
The LS1 has advantages and drawbacks those that think since the LS1 came out the LT1s are not worthwhile are just narrowminded and will accuse fast LT1s of spraying or something because their ignorance blinds them. Them saying the LT1 is not worthwhile would be like us saying the Gen1 is not worthwhile. Yes our motors have advancements over the gen1 but that doesn't make the gen1 bad, bet everyone here LT1 or LS1 has lost a race to a gen1 powered car of some sort.
- Torque
- Sound
- Cheap
I'm currently trying to sell her to get a 3rd gen fbody and put a gen 1 in it, but that's for totally different reasons. The LT1 is a stout motor in stock form, and all it takes is a catback, gears, tires and a mail-order tune to make it run high 12s.
Read his sig, and then think about his car, he is being sarcastic man.
LS1=Pretty sick powerband and nice botlon ##
Lt1=Awsome low end powerband and nice botlon ###






