View Poll Results: Which Turbo Gives more power?
Front Mounted Turbo
86
83.50%
Rear Mounted Turbo
17
16.50%
Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll
Front mounted Turbo or Rear Mounted
11-08-2006, 02:09 PM
#41
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 2,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You think your guy's rear mounts require a lot of plumbing. Check out what one shop is doing for the STS rear mount kit for the B-bodies 
Last edited by buffman; 11-08-2006 at 02:16 PM.
11-09-2006, 01:50 PM
#42
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 713-832-281 TX
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Speed Density
Fershizzle!
Its all in those few words.
Rear is easy to install and access, but wont make as much power.
Front is more custom work and harder to maintain compared to rear, but will seek kick *** numbers.
Tony.
Its all in those few words.
Rear is easy to install and access, but wont make as much power.
Front is more custom work and harder to maintain compared to rear, but will seek kick *** numbers.
Tony.
major spray on here has gone 7.7 at 188 mph with rear mount turbo, in the outlaw 10.5 class,
so they obviously dont have any prob making power
bbc, comparison, efficiency, front, good, intercooler, lt1, make, mount, mounted, performance, physics, power, rear, turbo, turbos
