LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Roller Rocker HP?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #1  
undercoverz-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default Roller Rocker HP?

i'm going to a crane cam roller rocker gold series 1.6 ratio and was just wondering what kind of hp/torque increase i should see. thanks.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #2  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally Posted by undercoverz-28
i'm going to a crane cam roller rocker gold series 1.6 ratio and was just wondering what kind of hp/torque increase i should see. thanks.
Are you are putting them on a stock engine? I put a set on mine when it was stock, baselined the car with four pulls on the dyno, swapped them out while still sitting on the rollers, tested it again, at the same intake air and coolant temps, found 3.5 rwhp averaging four pulls each way. That was about $100.00 per rwhp.

If your engine is stock, and you have not bought the rockers yet, I would spend my money elsewhere. My track times did not improve at all.

good luck, Ed
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 11:04 PM
  #3  
undercoverz-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default

i have all the basics. CAI, headers, 3" exhaust with no cat and underdrive pully. well at least that everything done under the hood. after the rockers i plan on new gears (most likely 3.90's) then cam then head work.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 04:46 PM
  #4  
Compstall's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
Default

I also dyno'd mine. Gained 7 rwhp and 2 lbs of torque peak.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #5  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally Posted by Compstall
I also dyno'd mine. Gained 7 rwhp and 2 lbs of torque peak.

How long between tests? Was the car moved from the dyno between tests?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #6  
thesoundandthefury's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Wright
I put a set on mine when it was stock
Are you talking stock as in the longblock is untouched but it has bolt ons, or BONE stock as in the rockers were the very first thing you did to the motor?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 11:48 PM
  #7  
Compstall's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Wright
How long between tests? Was the car moved from the dyno between tests?
Ed, the way you did yours was probably the most accurate. I have dyno'd nearly all my power mods individually, albeit not on the same day. I'm sure the 2 lbs of torque was negligible, as you could make that up by snapping the throttle a little harder, etc. 7 rwhp was the peak gain I saw on my car. Many people on the net talk up 10-15 hp w/ a rocker swap, although I've never seen a true before/after dyno; that's why I do my own dyno testing to see the real gains. In my experience, as you've probably seen yourself, I've gained on average roughly half the hp at the wheels that all the manufacturers claim. I'm suspecting they advertise their gains based on blown stroker motors and big blocks though.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 10:24 AM
  #8  
Ed Wright's Avatar
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 9
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
Are you talking stock as in the longblock is untouched but it has bolt ons, or BONE stock as in the rockers were the very first thing you did to the motor?

I'm talking the original 120,000 mile engine, that had never even had the valve covers off. Stock exhaust, 3.23 gears, stock converter, etc. Only PCM tuning.

Changes that small need done same day, without moving the car off the rollers. you can take a car off, and put it back and often get different numbers, due only to slight changes in alignment with the rollers. The weather stations that comes with these dynos, and weather correction software is not as great as some would like to believe. Very small changes, tested on different days may or may not be accurate. You don't really know unless you make the changes with the car on the dyno, after making three or four baseline pulls in the original configuration. Then four or so pulls with the new parts, and average the pulls both ways. Coolant temp is so critical to the LT1/LT4 (or any iron block engine) as well as intake air (with any engine) power output that those have to be the same before and after the changes also. Otherwise you don't really know where you are. I would not bother with rockers until I had it apart for the cam.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-3

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-7

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

 Brett Foote
story-9

10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #9  
thesoundandthefury's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Wright
I'm talking the original 120,000 mile engine, that had never even had the valve covers off. Stock exhaust, 3.23 gears, stock converter, etc. Only PCM tuning.

Changes that small need done same day, without moving the car off the rollers. you can take a car off, and put it back and often get different numbers, due only to slight changes in alignment with the rollers. The weather stations that comes with these dynos, and weather correction software is not as great as some would like to believe. Very small changes, tested on different days may or may not be accurate. You don't really know unless you make the changes with the car on the dyno, after making three or four baseline pulls in the original configuration. Then four or so pulls with the new parts, and average the pulls both ways. Coolant temp is so critical to the LT1/LT4 (or any iron block engine) as well as intake air (with any engine) power output that those have to be the same before and after the changes also. Otherwise you don't really know where you are. I would not bother with rockers until I had it apart for the cam.
Thanks for the response Ed. The reason I was asking about this is because to my understanding, however well a higher ratio rocker will benefit an engine's power curve depends on how well the engine is able to breathe. In most threads I've seen where somebody was reporting dyno gains after installing a set, you can look and see that they did this after having already installed other "breathing" mods like CAI's, bigger thottle body, headers/exhaust etc. However, conventional logic (law of diminishing returns) dictates that the more bolt-ons you install, the less gains per mod you will see in relation to what they are advertised to give. So in other words, if you were to bolt a catback system onto a bone stock car, you might get 15rwhp, but if you were to bolt a catback system onto a car that already had all the other bolt-ons, you'd probably only see about 7. But with rockers, since their ability to produce more power seems to depend on the engine's ability to move more air, I'm wondering if this might be the one bolt-on mod whose ability to increase power works opposite of all other bolt-ons? (I.E.- less power with no mods, more power with more mods.)

Your thoughts?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 01:41 PM
  #10  
thesoundandthefury's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
Default

Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
LilSlo1's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 305
Likes: 1
From: Plainfield, Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by undercoverz-28
i'm going to a crane cam roller rocker gold series 1.6 ratio and was just wondering what kind of hp/torque increase i should see. thanks.
Is this on a LT1 ?? cause a 1.6 ratio rocker on a LS1 would decrease lift and duration and lower power.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 10:08 PM
  #12  
undercoverz-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default

'97 Lt1
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 10:15 AM
  #13  
edlt1's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Yeah I have a 96 lt1. I have a set of cranes energizer 1.6 rr sitting around. Everyone said to not bother putting them on because the power increase wasn't anything special unless you have some internal work done.

But I wonder if it would be a good idea to throw them on now since I am doing a 100 shot? Would it be a little easier on the motor?

Do I need different valve springs even though its a stock cam and everything?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 11:43 PM
  #14  
undercoverz-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, Fl
Default

easire on the motor...i would think not.
different springs...not usually.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2006 | 05:08 AM
  #15  
Louvit's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

I hear that 1.6 rollers on stock springs may cause spring bind and go kaboom
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.

story-0
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-3
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-4
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-5
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

The world was a better place when it was still around.

By Brett Foote | 2026-01-23 09:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

Slideshow: The 7.0-liter LS7 was designed for absolute cutting-edge performance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-07 18:36:00


VIEW MORE