LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

LS1 vs. LT1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2006 | 08:45 AM
  #141  
slowmofo's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 1
From: Melbourne, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by darrensls1
A little wheel hop has been known to kill these things too. It's definately a crap shoot. There was a guy here a few years ago named the colonel. He was well in the 10's on a similair setup. He ran forever it seemed on his 10 bolt and 3.23's. Now if you put taller gears in the 10 bolt it increases the chance of breaking significantly IMO. So the key is stay with 2.73 or 3.23, always preload the drivetrain and say a little extra prayer in church on Sundays
very true, I have a friend who was running 2.73's in his 10 sec car. Didn't want to change the gears in fear of breaking them anyway. Now he's rocking a 12 bolt. Looks like the direction Im gonna go..
Old 09-19-2006 | 10:01 AM
  #142  
wrd1972's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,659
Likes: 4
From: Central Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by LSWaaa?
i think people need to factor in the fact that an LT1 is 92-97 technology whereas an LS1 is 97-03 technology. its like comparing apples to oranges.

This obviously is not apparent with many people here.
Old 09-19-2006 | 10:37 AM
  #143  
Captainofiron's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Default

Originally Posted by wrd1972
Originally Posted by LSWaaa?
i think people need to factor in the fact that an LT1 is 92-97 technology whereas an LS1 is 97-03 technology. its like comparing apples to oranges.



This obviously is not apparent with many people here.
QFT. Man this is like the longest LT1 vs. LS1 thread in the history of time that hasnt gotten locked for something
Old 09-19-2006 | 11:23 AM
  #144  
slowmofo's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 1
From: Melbourne, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Captainofiron
QFT. Man this is like the longest LT1 vs. LS1 thread in the history of time that hasnt gotten locked for something
Most of the posts make sense, noting over the top or real bashing has happen (yet im sure)

I have had both cars, i do miss the feel, and sound of my LT1. The LS1 is more refined feeling.
Old 09-19-2006 | 12:16 PM
  #145  
wrd1972's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,659
Likes: 4
From: Central Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by Captainofiron
QFT. Man this is like the longest LT1 vs. LS1 thread in the history of time that hasnt gotten locked for something
I truly believe it will hit 200 posts at the rate it is currently going. I am sure the worst is yet to come.
Old 09-19-2006 | 12:22 PM
  #146  
Vendetta's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 1
From: NYC metro area
Default

Originally Posted by Captainofiron
Man this is like the longest LT1 vs. LS1 thread in the history of time that hasnt gotten locked for something
You guys are actually behaving yourselves for once.

No reason to lock it unless it gets out of hand.
Old 09-19-2006 | 01:11 PM
  #147  
Honda Hunter's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: The beautiful Kingdom of Bahrain
Default

If the new AFR heads are anything like they claim to be then it may breath new life into the LTX series. I really look foward to some real world testing.
Old 09-19-2006 | 01:15 PM
  #148  
burnzilla's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
From: Upstate NY
Default

This is not even close to being a long LT1 Vs LS1 Thread.
Ive seen 20+ page threads about this.
___________
And someone please help "onebadblackz".
Old 09-19-2006 | 03:38 PM
  #149  
96redcamaro's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Houston/The Woodlands
Default

i think people need to factor in the fact that an LT1 is 92-97 technology whereas an LS1 is 97-03 technology. its like comparing apples to oranges.
yes this is true from the factory obviously. but you got to think of that fact there you can BUY current technology for the LT1.
Old 09-19-2006 | 03:45 PM
  #150  
Honda Hunter's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: The beautiful Kingdom of Bahrain
Default

Originally Posted by 96redcamaro
yes this is true from the factory obviously. but you got to think of that fact there you can BUY current technology for the LT1.
I was thinking about that but why re-invent the wheel? What current technology are you reffering to?
Old 09-19-2006 | 03:55 PM
  #151  
Quick1998Z28's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Iranndia
Default

Originally Posted by Dragframe
I think you need to take a walk over to the forced inductions section... those people building max effort motors... going ALL out seem to prefer the iron block. Im talking 1000 hp up or ls1s taking nasty hits of nitrous.
No one is talking about max efforts here. aluminum blocks can get you into the 8s.
Old 09-19-2006 | 04:08 PM
  #152  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,888
Likes: 7
From: Houston,TX
Default

Originally Posted by Quick1998Z28
No one is talking about max efforts here. aluminum blocks can get you into the 8s.
the iron block has been proven well into the 7's and even 6's
the 4 bolt per cylinder issue is highly overrated, the iron block has alredy seen over 1500 hp with no sealing issues properly prepared
lifting heads is a tuning/management issue not a 4 bolt per cylinder one
Old 09-19-2006 | 04:22 PM
  #153  
96redcamaro's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Houston/The Woodlands
Default

Originally Posted by Honda Hunter
I was thinking about that but why re-invent the wheel? What current technology are you reffering to?
yeah that is true why re-invent the wheel. I was thinking that you can buy current technology for an LT1 when you rebuild it. like heads and cam, and ignition (msd, delteq) and intake (Super Vic) and pistons. etc etc. so I guess.... witch motor has more potential when doing a rebuild. and of couse the LS1 has aluminum. but other than that. ??? . and also still the fact that the LT1 can use nasty gen 1 heads. just a thought. like to see what yall have to say. although I think I already know.
Old 09-19-2006 | 04:43 PM
  #154  
darrensls1's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 1
From: Sandwich, IL
Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
the iron block has been proven well into the 7's and even 6's
the 4 bolt per cylinder issue is highly overrated, the iron block has alredy seen over 1500 hp with no sealing issues properly prepared
lifting heads is a tuning/management issue not a 4 bolt per cylinder one
I don't think anyone will argue that iron > aluminum for 900 or more HP applications.

But not too many people will argue with this either:

Aluminum > Iron for 900 or less HP applications (for no other reason besides saving weight in the nose).

And if you look at these big power cars you see they are usually big cubed motors. So if someone asks me which is better the LT1's iron block or the LS1's aluminum block I have to say the LS1's aluminum. Because by the time you have enough power to need an iron block you have all ready ditched the stock shortblock and bought a 383, 402, 408, 427, ect. When you do that then whatever you used to have from the factory is now a mute point.

Now lets say you drove the car for 3 years prior to a stroker. I would rather have had aluminum for those 3 years because it saves 100 lbs. of weight and that made me another .1 quicker for those first three years.
Old 09-19-2006 | 04:49 PM
  #155  
Honda Hunter's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: The beautiful Kingdom of Bahrain
Default

Originally Posted by 96redcamaro
yeah that is true why re-invent the wheel. I was thinking that you can buy current technology for an LT1 when you rebuild it. like heads and cam, and ignition (msd, delteq) and intake (Super Vic) and pistons. etc etc. so I guess.... witch motor has more potential when doing a rebuild. and of couse the LS1 has aluminum. but other than that. ??? . and also still the fact that the LT1 can use nasty gen 1 heads. just a thought. like to see what yall have to say. although I think I already know.
All the stuff you mentioned isnt new technology. The heads weve had thus far have been around a while although head porters are doing better and better with stock heads. The ignition is still based off the opti regardless. Until they delete it completely it's old technology. The supervic is in no way new technology. The LS1 has more things going for it than what you listed. To get these so called nasty 23 degree heads from the SBC you still have to convert them etc while the LS1 has a "nasty" selection of heads off the shelf.
LT1 will always be a winner because it's so cheap to get and you can make decent power with them without going broke. The LS1 is falling into that same class I feel. Not hard to find a used LS1 for a decent price and make some serious power with a nice H/C/I setup. That's why I said why invent the wheel. Depending on your goal both motors and both versions of the Fbody can be had a decent prices so in the end it's about what you want.
I dont think the LT1 time is over but I dont expect anything super revolutionary to come out anytime soon.
Old 09-20-2006 | 06:34 PM
  #156  
crb806's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

cant let this die



Quick Reply: LS1 vs. LT1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.