LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Trans am hatch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2009 | 11:57 PM
  #41  
LT1's Avatar
LT1
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 4
From: NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by 1995blacktattop
The T43 uplevel spoiler was most likely made standard on the T/A in 1998.
Hmm. Thats weird because, I have seen few LS1 T/A's with low riser spoiler.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 12:10 AM
  #42  
brynnda's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: ORANGECOUNTY
Default

Originally Posted by LT1
Hmm. Thats weird because, I have seen few LS1 T/A's with low riser spoiler.


i know there were NO ls1 trans ams with a low rise spoiler, they were swapped
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 12:22 AM
  #43  
1995blacktattop's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 3
From: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Default

Originally Posted by brynnda
i know there were NO ls1 trans ams with a low rise spoiler, they were swapped
I agree. I've NEVER seen an LS1 T/A with a low rise spoiler that wasn't a 'vert.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 12:56 AM
  #44  
brynnda's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: ORANGECOUNTY
Default

Originally Posted by 1995blacktattop
I agree. I've NEVER seen an LS1 T/A with a low rise spoiler that wasn't a 'vert.
im pretty confident saying they dont exist unless someone swapped it
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 12:59 AM
  #45  
1995blacktattop's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 3
From: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Default

Originally Posted by brynnda
im pretty confident saying they dont exist unless someone swapped it
Yeah i think you're right. I've never seen one myself. I'm pretty sure the raised wing became standard in either 97 or 98. I have seen 96's with the low rise spoiler but i don't know about 97s.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 04:10 AM
  #46  
93TAJ.C.'s Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Default

Iv got a 1993 Trans Am gt, black, high rise spoiler, black leather, ttops, m29 t56, 3.23 gears, 155 speedo, and z rated tires (now ws6 wheels). Also came with the 10 speaker stereo, not sure if it was monsoon, or if they even put the monsoon in the 1993's because i got it with no stereo.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #47  
1995blacktattop's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 3
From: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Default

Originally Posted by 93TAJ.C.
Iv got a 1993 Trans Am gt, black, high rise spoiler, black leather, ttops, m29 t56, 3.23 gears, 155 speedo, and z rated tires (now ws6 wheels). Also came with the 10 speaker stereo, not sure if it was monsoon, or if they even put the monsoon in the 1993's because i got it with no stereo.
Monsoon didn't come out until i think 1997. Your car (and mine) has the 10 speaker "premium" sound system. i always thought it was Bose but they only applied that name to the Camaro and Corvette.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #48  
djjab57's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

put ur vin # in and it will tell you what your car came with

http://www.compnine.com/vid.php?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #49  
DAVE00's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 2
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Pretyflywiteguy
In 93 the trans-am had the batwing but no leather. GM made it an option in 94 as the Trans-am GT which included leather and all the other bells and whistles. In 95 the trans-am was fully loaded.
Sorry man, this is not true. I have a 95' and had it since new in 95' and it originally came with cloth and the dealer installed custom leather as a deal closer. Not all 95's were fully loaded as leather was still an option that had to be checked.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:02 PM
  #50  
MasterTomos's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,509
Likes: 4
From: Midwest
Default

Originally Posted by 93TAJ.C.
Iv got a 1993 Trans Am gt, black, high rise spoiler, black leather, ttops, m29 t56, 3.23 gears, 155 speedo, and z rated tires (now ws6 wheels). Also came with the 10 speaker stereo, not sure if it was monsoon, or if they even put the monsoon in the 1993's because i got it with no stereo.
That's odd, I thought manual cars always had 3.42's...
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #51  
Al 96 Ram Air T/A's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Jamesburg, NJ
Default

WOW! A lot of half truths in this post.

I will only speak about 1996 Firebirds, since this is what I am intimately familiar with:

* the Hi-Rise (or Uplevel) spoiler was NOT an automatic on ANY Firebird model. It was option T43...and I believe it was a $325 option.

* whether one ordered the WS6 package or not, the spoiler was optional.

* the Formula (or low) spoiler was standard on ALL models

* while the WS6 package could be ordered on the Formula or Trans Am, when added to the convertible, you DID NOT get the suspension upgrades, or the 17" wheels (GM chose to use similar looking 16" wheels on these cars)

* the 1996 10-speaker radio was NOT called Monsoon - but for all practical purposes, was a "version" of the Monsoon. It utilized a small amplifier to drive the subwoofers, but DID NOT amplify the other 8 speakers. These were driven by the H/U. Because of this, some feel the subwoofers were more powerful in the 1996 cars than later years - but this is up for debate, as I have heard both. Neither sounds louder than the other to me.

* 96 and 97 WS6 cars were modified by SLP Engineering (which has since been sold) in Canada. They were based in Toms River, NJ. SLP Performance now runs the business, and has some of the records from the now defunct SLP Eng.

* The standard ring/pinion was 3.42 in the 6-speed. The "performance" upgrade (?) got you a 3.23 gear. Why GM chose to call this an upgrade is beyond me. Perhaps this is why almost no one ordered it.

* And finally, chrome 17" wheels were NOT available on WS6 cars (only silver was available). Neither was traction control for that matter. The chrome wheels appeared as an option in 1997.

Hope this clears things up...
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:19 PM
  #52  
1995blacktattop's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 3
From: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Default

Originally Posted by Al 96 Ram Air T/A
WOW! A lot of half truths in this post.

I will only speak about 1996 Firebirds, since this is what I am intimately familiar with:

* the Hi-Rise (or Uplevel) spoiler was NOT an automatic on ANY Firebird model. It was option T43...and I believe it was a $325 option.

* whether one ordered the WS6 package or not, the spoiler was optional.

* the Formula (or low) spoiler was standard on ALL models

* while the WS6 package could be ordered on the Formula or Trans Am, when added to the convertible, you DID NOT get the suspension upgrades, or the 17" wheels (GM chose to use similar looking 16" wheels on these cars)

* the 1996 10-speaker radio was NOT called Monsoon - but for all practical purposes, was a "version" of the Monsoon. It utilized a small amplifier to drive the subwoofers, but DID NOT amplify the other 8 speakers. These were driven by the H/U. Because of this, some feel the subwoofers were more powerful in the 1996 cars than later years - but this is up for debate, as I have heard both. Neither sounds louder than the other to me.

* 96 and 97 WS6 cars were modified by SLP Engineering (which has since been sold) in Canada. They were based in Toms River, NJ. SLP Performance now runs the business, and has some of the records from the now defunct SLP Eng.

* The standard ring/pinion was 3.42 in the 6-speed. The "performance" upgrade (?) got you a 3.23 gear. Why GM chose to call this an upgrade is beyond me. Perhaps this is why almost no one ordered it.

* And finally, chrome 17" wheels were NOT available on WS6 cars (only silver was available). Neither was traction control for that matter. The chrome wheels appeared as an option in 1997.

Hope this clears things up...
According to the firebird book i have, T43 was a required option with the WS6 package on the Trans am coupe as was the 3:23 GU5 axle ratio on the automatics.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #53  
Al 96 Ram Air T/A's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Jamesburg, NJ
Default

Required? Hmmm...Maybe...but I do know I was charged for it. Since I was set on getting it, I'm not sure what would have happened if I asked for the standard one.

And yes...3.23 was standard on the automatics. ( I stand corrected - it was not standard) I don't recall if you had any "performance" option on the autos. Been too many years since I ordered my 1996.

Funny story...when I placed the order for mine in Sept. 1995, I had to fight with the dealer. He refused to believe Pontiac was making a WS6 car...even though I came prepared with all of the ordering numbers. It was after 30 minutes of "heated" conversation, and several phone calls to GM that he agreed to place my order. He even tried to sell me a blue(? I think it was blue) car, even though I knew WS6 cars only came in red, white, black, and silver. Big dummy...

Last edited by Al 96 Ram Air T/A; Dec 17, 2009 at 02:37 PM. Reason: I was wrong ;-)
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #54  
1995blacktattop's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 3
From: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Default

Originally Posted by Al 96 Ram Air T/A
Required? Hmmm...Maybe...but I do know I was charged for it. Since I was set on getting it, I'm not sure what would have happened if I asked for the standard one.

And yes...3.23 was standard on the automatics. I don't recall if you had any "performance" option on the autos. Been too many years since I ordered my 1996.

Funny story...when I placed the order for mine in Sept. 1995, I had to fight with the dealer. He refused to believe Pontiac was making a WS6 car...even though I came prepared with all of the ordering numbers. It was after 30 minutes of "heated" conversation, and several phone calls to GM that he agreed to place my order. He even tried to sell me a blue(? I think it was blue) car, even though I knew WS6 cars only came in red, white, black, and silver. Big dummy...
actually 3:23 was not standard on the automatics. the automatic had 2:73 standard. what i was referring to was that when you ordered the WS6 package you had to check the box for the T43 spoiler (on the T/A) and the GU5 3:23 performance ratio (on an automatic car)

I'm guessing the Z rated tires were probably mandatory as well. I've never seen a WS6 car that didn't have the 155mph speedo.

they were available in green as well as red white black and silver.

Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #55  
93TAJ.C.'s Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah i never understood why the 3.23 was a performance option, and why the hell anyone would order it unless they had the m29 t56 like me, wich means the gearing is lower and highway speeds need a smaller rear gear. I'm at 2000rpm at 70mph. I'm still doing 3.73"s wich im told by a very reputable source will feeel just like 4.10's in an m28 t56 car (1994 and up).

Also, i have the 10 speaker stereo, wich i guess is premium sound. Do i have an amp then? Where would it be? In the quarter somewhere?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #56  
93TAJ.C.'s Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Default

So are the 3.23's a performance option for the m6 cars in 1993?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #57  
93TAJ.C.'s Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pretyflywiteguy
In 93 the trans-am had the batwing but no leather. GM made it an option in 94 as the Trans-am GT which included leather and all the other bells and whistles. In 95 the trans-am was fully loaded.
But i have a 1993 with leather?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #58  
1995blacktattop's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 3
From: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Default

the amp i think is in one of the speaker covers by the rear seat. i've never had mine off so i'm not sure on that one. From what i heard yes 3:23's were a gear ratio used on 1993 only T56's.

Originally Posted by 93TAJ.C.
But i have a 1993 with leather?

I had a friend in FL with a red 93 Trans Am with beige leather and the GT wing. From what i remember reading somewhere, ALL 1993 trans ams were GT's with the raised wing and then in 94 they split the model into the base trans am and GT and only the GT got the uplevel wing. not sure about leather but i think it was avilable in both and maybe standard on the GT. Then in 95 they dropped the GT option and just made all the options seperate. My car if it were a 94 would probably be a GT since its got the uplevel wing, the performance 3:23 axle, 10 speaker system, and leather. i think the only 2 options i didn't get were a CD player and Traction control.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #59  
djjab57's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

If you go to that site i posted the link to it will tell you every option that came on your car
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #60  
Al 96 Ram Air T/A's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Jamesburg, NJ
Default

Honestly...I do not know. I'm not "qualified" to speak about anything other than 1996 cars.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.