LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

hp increase w/ 383?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2007, 12:17 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
eLTwerker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default hp increase w/ 383?

All things being equal, whats a decent estimation of hp gain when going from 350 to 383?
Old 04-14-2007, 12:31 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
93ZM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You will gain some but TORQUE is the key here
Old 04-14-2007, 01:26 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eLTwerker
All things being equal, whats a decent estimation of hp gain when going from 350 to 383?
Approximately 0 hp give or take 1-2 hp.
Old 04-14-2007, 06:46 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

torque baby! and more streetable horsepower
Old 04-14-2007, 06:50 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
383_LT1_1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Corsicana, TX
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would think that you would gain more pwoer. Your increasing C.I. and increasing flow a hell of alot. Now how much power over stock you would gain im not sure of.
Old 04-14-2007, 07:31 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 383_LT1_1295
i would think that you would gain more pwoer. Your increasing C.I. and increasing flow a hell of alot. Now how much power over stock you would gain im not sure of.
You are increasing average flow but unless the heads are ported or the cam swapped peak flow stays exactly the same and you don't make any more power.
Old 04-14-2007, 07:37 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
383_LT1_1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Corsicana, TX
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

okay thats what i thought. cause i plan to build a 383, im using a scat crank with 6.00 inch rods with the LE3 h/c package.
Old 04-14-2007, 07:54 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
ABA383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southern PA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

With my experience with my 383 build I make power/torque with less cam and at lower rpms than my 350 (355) counterparts...Thats just a general statement, but I run stock ported LT1 heads with 2.00/1.56s and a 226/234 cam...I make peak power at 6300rpms and run a 3600 stall/3.73s...Most of the time to run what I run with a 350 set up, its got more cam and consequently moves power and torque farther up the rpm scale, requiring more gear/converter...383s tend to make more power/torque under the curve at lower rpms...Not spinning this thing to the moon has surely helped my motor last for 12 years, not to mention having a big time bullet proof bottom end with a Callies crank, Oliver billet steel 5.85" rods, and JE pistons...Just my .02...

--Alan
Old 04-14-2007, 07:58 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
383_LT1_1295's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Corsicana, TX
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ABA383
With my experience with my 383 build I make power/torque with less cam and at lower rpms than my 350 (355) counterparts...Thats just a general statement, but I run stock ported LT1 heads with 2.00/1.56s and a 226/234 cam...I make peak power at 6300rpms and run a 3600 stall/3.73s...Most of the time to run what I run with a 350 set up, its got more cam and consequently moves power and torque farther up the rpm scale, requiring more gear/converter...383s tend to make more power/torque under the curve at lower rpms...Not spinning this thing to the moon has surely helped my motor last for 12 years, not to mention having a big time bullet proof bottom end with a Callies crank, Oliver billet steel 5.85" rods, and JE pistons...Just my .02...

--Alan
just curious, but how much HP/TQ are you making with that setup?
Old 04-14-2007, 08:12 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
ABA383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southern PA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

On a local Mustang Dyno it made 385/375 thru my old Borla cat back... I've since added 3" TDs and ax X pipe and haven't been back to the dyno yet...My sig times/mph were made with the 385/375 numbers...But I've out mph'd people with dyno sheets claiming 420 rwhp, so I don't hold a whole lot of faith in dyno numbers...I just use them to get my tune right...

--Alan
Old 04-14-2007, 08:20 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ABA383
With my experience with my 383 build I make power/torque with less cam and at lower rpms than my 350 (355) counterparts...Thats just a general statement, but I run stock ported LT1 heads with 2.00/1.56s and a 226/234 cam...I make peak power at 6300rpms and run a 3600 stall/3.73s...Most of the time to run what I run with a 350 set up, its got more cam and consequently moves power and torque farther up the rpm scale, requiring more gear/converter...383s tend to make more power/torque under the curve at lower rpms...Not spinning this thing to the moon has surely helped my motor last for 12 years, not to mention having a big time bullet proof bottom end with a Callies crank, Oliver billet steel 5.85" rods, and JE pistons...Just my .02...

--Alan
If you took an engine setup thats 355 cubic inches and then kept the same cam, same heads same everything, just put in the stroker crank and appropriate pistons. It would feel as if you had put in gears and a stall.



Quick Reply: hp increase w/ 383?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 PM.