











LT1 Stainless headers poll
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time


and how would the heat retention in these compare to coated steel? everyone ive talked to has said either that theyll be about as good, or that they wont hold a candle to coated, and living in AZ with uncoated LTs is not what i wanna do unless stainless steel can keep a fair amount of it in (which ive heard it can.. but again, id like to know fo sho)
Typical 1010 carbon (mild) steel conducts 219% more heat per foot than do the types of stainless steel we use in header fabrication. By contrast, quite a bit more heat stays inside the stainless header tubes and does not get passed into the surrounding air. By not allowing the contraction of the cooling gases as they flow down the tubes, more exhaust velocity is retained which promotes better scavenging at the collector. This retention of velocity increases the overall header efficiency.
You've probably seen Indy cars with their enclosed engine compartments and thermal clam-shell enclosures around their turbocharger headers. They must thermally wrap their exhaust pipes just so the radiant heat off the tubes won't cause fires or melt any critical systems. In this case headers made out of mild steel would completely fail and break apart due to the severe heat retention, let alone scale and send death particles into the turbocharger, ruining the turbine blades. 321 stainless steel has excellent high temperature fatigue resistance in this enclosed application and does a darn good job of living in this hostile environment better than any other material except the ultra-high nickel content steels ( such an Inconel ), which are hard to find, very difficult to work with and extremely expensive.
^^^That link also includes a chart at the bottom that outlines all the physical properties of different types of metal. As you'll see, the coefficient of thermal conductivity in 321 stainless is about 1/3 that of mild carbon steel.
Hope that answers your question.






