Intake
08-15-2007, 10:32 PM
#2
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not sure if the runners and all of that are the same, but the outside is not.
the fuel rail crossover(forget what that is actually called) on the front of the intake is straight across on the 93, while the 95 is angled
............95.............................93
the fuel rail crossover(forget what that is actually called) on the front of the intake is straight across on the 93, while the 95 is angled
............95.............................93
08-15-2007, 10:54 PM
#3
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
No, the fuel rail cross over buggers up the 94+. The 93 is the best MWAHAHAHAH (no really, that cross over makes a very small turbulence area, not that it's even noticeable lol but fun to nitpick!)
08-16-2007, 12:16 AM
#4
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Easton, Md
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlazerINtheWork
not sure if the runners and all of that are the same, but the outside is not.
the fuel rail crossover(forget what that is actually called) on the front of the intake is straight across on the 93, while the 95 is angled
............95.............................93
the fuel rail crossover(forget what that is actually called) on the front of the intake is straight across on the 93, while the 95 is angled
............95.............................93
I bought an extra intake to have it P&P by LLoyd Elliot, so I don't suffer any down time. DUH... for me for not looking at this earlier, but I just noticed the casting mumbers are the same. Mine is a 95 and looks just like the intake I took off a 93 and both have the same casting number (10108630). So according to your pictures they shouldn't have been the same, but since they both look like the picture on th left, I should be good to go.
08-17-2007, 08:41 AM
#5
Originally Posted by Formula350
No, the fuel rail cross over buggers up the 94+. The 93 is the best MWAHAHAHAH (no really, that cross over makes a very small turbulence area, not that it's even noticeable lol but fun to nitpick!)
08-17-2007, 10:19 AM
#7
Originally Posted by GIZMO
They are good enough that the NHRA made us quit running them on anything but 1993's in Stock Eliminator.
I don't know if anyone has any experiance on this by my suspicions would be once ported there is little difference among all the LT1 intakes.