LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2007 | 11:23 PM
  #1  
mack's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Easton, Md
Default Intake

Is the 93 & 95 LT-1 intake the same?
Old 08-15-2007 | 11:32 PM
  #2  
BlazerINtheWork's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

not sure if the runners and all of that are the same, but the outside is not.


the fuel rail crossover(forget what that is actually called) on the front of the intake is straight across on the 93, while the 95 is angled




............95.............................93
Old 08-15-2007 | 11:54 PM
  #3  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

No, the fuel rail cross over buggers up the 94+. The 93 is the best MWAHAHAHAH (no really, that cross over makes a very small turbulence area, not that it's even noticeable lol but fun to nitpick!)
Old 08-16-2007 | 01:16 AM
  #4  
mack's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Easton, Md
Default

Originally Posted by BlazerINtheWork
not sure if the runners and all of that are the same, but the outside is not.


the fuel rail crossover(forget what that is actually called) on the front of the intake is straight across on the 93, while the 95 is angled




............95.............................93
Had me worried for a minute.
I bought an extra intake to have it P&P by LLoyd Elliot, so I don't suffer any down time. DUH... for me for not looking at this earlier, but I just noticed the casting mumbers are the same. Mine is a 95 and looks just like the intake I took off a 93 and both have the same casting number (10108630). So according to your pictures they shouldn't have been the same, but since they both look like the picture on th left, I should be good to go.
Old 08-17-2007 | 09:41 AM
  #5  
GIZMO's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 3
From: Shelby, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Formula350
No, the fuel rail cross over buggers up the 94+. The 93 is the best MWAHAHAHAH (no really, that cross over makes a very small turbulence area, not that it's even noticeable lol but fun to nitpick!)
They are good enough that the NHRA made us quit running them on anything but 1993's in Stock Eliminator.
Old 08-17-2007 | 11:09 AM
  #6  
ZONES89RS's Avatar
In-Zane Moderator
15 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,939
Likes: 32
From: Conroe, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by GIZMO
They are good enough that the NHRA made us quit running them on anything but 1993's in Stock Eliminator.
No ****? That is pretty funny.
Old 08-17-2007 | 11:19 AM
  #7  
96capricemgr's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by GIZMO
They are good enough that the NHRA made us quit running them on anything but 1993's in Stock Eliminator.
So as cast they are better, now how about ported. Few of us have to abide by stock eliminator as cast rules.

I don't know if anyone has any experiance on this by my suspicions would be once ported there is little difference among all the LT1 intakes.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.