running a 52mm tb?
09-04-2007, 12:31 AM
#21
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Get forced induction. That's where it spawned from, high altitudes and engines starving for air. Mind you, this was in planes, not cars, but us crazy people always find a way to get one thing working for another 
09-04-2007, 04:57 AM
#22
Originally Posted by GIZMO
To make me a believer it would have to be back to back runs with as much detail as possible (coolant temp, A/F ratio, etc.). And no cooling fan running in front of the car.
I have never seen a dyno not use the front cooling fan, on LT1 or not. Loading the engine without cooling it like it would be naturally doesnt seem like a good idea to me - I sure wouldnt let them do it with my car.
09-04-2007, 07:17 PM
#23
Originally Posted by Puck
I have never seen a dyno not use the front cooling fan, on LT1 or not. Loading the engine without cooling it like it would be naturally doesnt seem like a good idea to me - I sure wouldnt let them do it with my car.
Placing a large fan blowing cooler denser air into the intake tract can often lead to misleading dyno results. I try to eliminate every variable that I can. Maybe that's why I don't get those great dyno numbers that I always read on here?
Take Care,
Daren
09-04-2007, 07:54 PM
#24
Originally Posted by GIZMO
When I dyno I pay very close attention to the engine temp and try to do all tests within a few degrees. My fan and electric water pump are on manual switches. The engine cooling system takes care of itself.
Placing a large fan blowing cooler denser air into the intake tract can often lead to misleading dyno results. I try to eliminate every variable that I can. Maybe that's why I don't get those great dyno numbers that I always read on here?
Take Care,
Daren
Placing a large fan blowing cooler denser air into the intake tract can often lead to misleading dyno results. I try to eliminate every variable that I can. Maybe that's why I don't get those great dyno numbers that I always read on here?
Take Care,
Daren
09-04-2007, 10:00 PM
#25
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Like I said, I would assume they use that not just for cooling purposes, but for simulation purposes as well. If I was you, I'd run 2 with and 2 with out. Both after the car is up to operating temp.
09-05-2007, 07:27 AM
#26
Originally Posted by Formula350
Like I said, I would assume they use that not just for cooling purposes, but for simulation purposes as well. If I was you, I'd run 2 with and 2 with out. Both after the car is up to operating temp.
09-06-2007, 09:05 PM
#27
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Formula350
I think he's pulling out the "Rule of the Internet" card. "Pics, or you're lying". Or in this case, a link with said dyno sheet/results. I'm not sure if ws6.com/org/net (whatever) has a TB dyno.
but heres some number for ya
cat back exhaust, cat delete,stock exhaust manifolds,2800 stall with stock 2.73 gears, full weight on 17" ss wheels/nittos
12.92@105.9. That was my car and those were my mods just because you drop $400 on a pointless T/B and some injectors dosent mean you going to go fast. I put a 52mm T/B on after those mods and didnt pick up a .5mph or a even .1, as a matter of fact it did absolutly nothing.
Judging by his mods 1.6 roller rockers would be money much better spent
