small cam with good power from 1500+
* Advertised Duration IN/EX: 270/278
* Duration @ .050 IN/EX: 221/229
* Gross Valve Lift IN/EX: .515"/.530"
* LSA / ICL: 112/106
* Valve Lash IN/EX: Hyd/Hyd
* RPM Range: 1800-5800
will these two cams have more torque than a stock LT1 even at 2500- ???
I would like to shift at 6000 or 6100 tops... so a cam that carries a flat curve till then would be nice.
later on down the line, I will get a set of mildly ported heads and a matched intake... but till then, I would like to have the same or more torque from the cam at 2500-
--Alan
--Alan
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I read that the LPE 211 increases dynamic compression ratio, thats what I want. match that with mild heads with some velocity porting and a matched intake and 52mm TB, I say it will be a great fun combo that should run really well.
I guess it is between the LPE 211 and the crane 227. All I need to know is which will make more trq and more hp and where. Anyone have a dyno graph? or anything?
thanks guys
Last edited by seadoo; Oct 30, 2007 at 09:20 PM.
I read that the LPE 211 increases dynamic compression ratio, thats what I want. match that with mild heads with some velocity porting and a matched intake and 52mm TB, I say it will be a great fun combo that should run really well.
I guess it is between the LPE 211 and the crane 227. All I need to know is which will make more trq and more hp and where. Anyone have a dyno graph? or anything?
thanks guys
--Alan
who does heads? Im want some velocity porting down to bring up the bottom end torque that is sometimes raised in RPM's because of porting?
thanks so much
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...19#post4175057
the comp seems to have the same torque, but better hp. my two questions about that is, the LPE is designed for 1.6rr's not 1.5's and both graphs only show from 3500 and up. I would think that the LPE would make better power below that range than the comp cams 218/224. opions?
--Alan
--Alan






