Anyone with Long Tube Headers Please Advise
11-12-2007, 11:40 PM
#21
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
uncoated stainless headers will give you higher engine bay temperatures than coated non stainless headers. just giving you some more info to help your decision.
but i have only heard good things about kooks, and if youve got the money its the only way to go. (only thing better is jet-hot coated kooks
)
but i have only heard good things about kooks, and if youve got the money its the only way to go. (only thing better is jet-hot coated kooks
)
11-13-2007, 07:26 AM
#22
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only thing better then that would be a seperate private company's coatings on the headers like an Airborne Coatings ceramic, much better formula and more evenly and thoroughly coated rather then the mass produces stuff from Jet-Hot. I do agree though, i wouldn't go un-coated, stainless or not, its not just for the rust
11-13-2007, 08:56 PM
#24
I would get the xs stainless headers that a sponsor here on the boards is coming out with. They will be the same price as pacesetters only stainless steel like the kooks. Im already thinking about ditching my 6mo old pacesetters for the stainless LT's when they come out. The pacesetters are really nice for the money though!
I'd be inclined to have them coated too, at least up top near the heads.
