1994 m6 tune on a 1993 auto computer?
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, West Virginia
I don't know what wiring harness you went with, but Painless ones aren't that expensive. I mean, sure $300-350 is a fair chunk for wiring, but it's not bad IMO.
As much as I want to switch to a EEPROM PCM, I don't have the money to do it. I'd leave the motor setup SD, but I'd want to use a 4L60E with it for line pressure tunablity(I think I just made a new word).
As much as I want to switch to a EEPROM PCM, I don't have the money to do it. I'd leave the motor setup SD, but I'd want to use a 4L60E with it for line pressure tunablity(I think I just made a new word).
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, West Virginia
its called modifying. i like to do some things myself and not just buy everything on the market. its what early hot rodding was about but now its all about how much money you have and whats on the market.
The shop that I take my car to recommended I do it, I also talked to a few other people who tune f-bodys an they felt it was the best thing to do. The 93s have a chip and are much harder to tune on a dyno. Every time you make a change a new chip would have to be burnt.
TECH Regular
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Mb
^ I just asked a buddy if i should switch too and he said no cause 93's handle mods better. He said the sensor can be inacurate in maf because it is so sensative. Apparently even oil off the air filter can cause innacurate readings.
