LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Possible new Intake manifold for LTX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2008, 03:11 PM
  #21  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Ponyhntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lee's Summit, MO (KC)
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by WHITEBOY_ZACH
well idk because ive heard lots of talk of turbulent air at higher rpm with a stock, or even the stock style edlebrock manifold. also the stock intake causes the cylinders to burn unevenly, whereas a single plane would help with both problems. i should have been a little more specific. im already leaning toward a single plane, now i dont know what components to get.
We're getting a little off topic, but trust me, with a P1SC, you'd be better off spending that intake money elsewhere. I know from experience.
Old 06-03-2008, 03:48 PM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Found the P#s for the RamJet stuff.

# 17096144 Throttle Body (GMPD $285)
# 12489371 Intake Manifold (GMPD $451)
# 12553918 Fuel Injection Rails
# 1115498 Ignition Coil
# 12097982 Ignition Wire Assembly
# 1104060 Electronic Distributor
# 10456126 Knock Sensor
# 8x 17124248 Injectors
# 16249939 MAP Sensor
# 17123897 Fuel Pressure Regulator

The only 2 things we need are in bold, and the other piece that maybe some people would want is the fuel rail, but I think you could make your own with kits. I'd love to see the results of that on an LT1. Had I the money, I'd do it And even then the prices aren't ALL that bad. If a standard LS TB fits, then you wouldn't have to buy one, but just find a used one somewhere for a few bucks.
Old 06-03-2008, 03:57 PM
  #23  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
OutlawZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think it comes down to this...

1. ALL OUT LT1's-Single plane conversion or Sheetmetal

2. ALL OTHERS-some version of a stock manifold either lt1 or lt4 and either up the jets or up the boost....

new manifold costs 500+ and gets you 5 extra hp.....

new jets cost 10.00 and will get you 25 extra hp....

at probably no cost of reliability to your motor... just make sure you got the fuel....
Old 06-03-2008, 04:00 PM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

New jets? For NOS or Carb?

I think the RamJet might make a bit more power than the LTx manifold due to (I believe) it was designed AFTER the LTx was fazed out. So they worked on the runners and probably added a tad more plenum volume as well.
Old 06-04-2008, 11:18 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
 
LT4POWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Me thinks T/A KID is addicted to intakes. Good info nonetheless. Thanks
Old 06-04-2008, 11:22 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Me thinks T/A KID is addicted to intakes. Good info nonetheless. Thanks
lol, maybe. I understand heads and camshafts pretty well, just trying to figure the intake thing out now, lol.
Many times however I feel like the LT1 community could benefit from a better intake manifold, not saying the stocker is bad just not the best choice IMO.
Old 06-04-2008, 06:52 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Well T/A, you have my vote for the man to try the RamJet
Old 06-04-2008, 08:40 PM
  #28  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (23)
 
FASTFATBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I can tell you from first hand experience that a Holley Stealth Ram WORKS in a normally aspirated application.

A buddy had one in a 93 Z28

383 Lt1
GUTTED stock heads
Solid roller
13.5 to 1 compression(race fuel)
1 7/8 headers
FAST system
turbo 350 with a brake
29.5x10.5 tire
Car weighed 3350 with driver

10.50@127 all motor, low 1.30 60fts

Car had low 10's in it, car was taken apart to build and Orsca EZ street car.

Tapout911 on this board now has this engine.
Old 06-04-2008, 09:33 PM
  #29  
Village Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 11,058
Received 536 Likes on 388 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
I can tell you from first hand experience that a Holley Stealth Ram WORKS in a normally aspirated application.

A buddy had one in a 93 Z28

383 Lt1
GUTTED stock heads
Solid roller
13.5 to 1 compression(race fuel)
1 7/8 headers
FAST system
turbo 350 with a brake
29.5x10.5 tire
Car weighed 3350 with driver

10.50@127 all motor, low 1.30 60fts

Car had low 10's in it, car was taken apart to build and Orsca EZ street car.

Tapout911 on this board now has this engine.
I'm not sure that is a real good example of it working? Has anyone tried to go that ET/MPH with a miniram setup running that kind of setup? W/ that CR and race gas and race weight? What are "gutted stock heads"?
Old 06-04-2008, 10:18 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Tapout911 on this board now has this engine.
Yep thats one of my really good buddy's lives about 10 minutes away.

Well T/A, you have my vote for the man to try the RamJet
If I was not boosted now, I would try some different intake manifolds, you bet on that.
Old 06-05-2008, 01:37 AM
  #31  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Tapout911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Paragould AR
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well the compression is around 12.5 to 13 now. By gutted he means they flow really well for stock castings, I had them flowed but would rather keep it quiet. I dont really see the benefit of the stealth ram cause it needs rpm. The previous owner was shifting around 8500 since he had a fast system, where as Im limited to 7k. Im not concerned with 5 or 10hp, Ive got something nobody else has and its looks good when the hood is up lol.



Last edited by Tapout911; 06-05-2008 at 01:57 AM.
Old 06-05-2008, 03:33 AM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

8,500, good lord lol

Well if anyone wants to donate a RamJet to me I'll be more than happy to test 'er out
Old 06-05-2008, 09:04 PM
  #33  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Formula350
heh Who cares about torque. Everyone does.
under 400rpms????? how often do you race someone under 4000 rpms....????
Old 06-05-2008, 09:08 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by T/A KID
I'll take a car that makes 30lbs more TQ in the lower rpms than one that makes a few more ponies at max rpm.
point is...that racing happens in the higher rpms.....so make power where you can use it.....even when my car was near stock I was at or over 4000 rpm when racing someone...
Old 06-05-2008, 09:13 PM
  #35  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by WHITEBOY_ZACH
well idk because ive heard lots of talk of turbulent air at higher rpm with a stock, or even the stock style edlebrock manifold. also the stock intake causes the cylinders to burn unevenly, whereas a single plane would help with both problems. i should have been a little more specific. im already leaning toward a single plane, now i dont know what components to get.
Yes yes yes....thats the problem with the stock style intake.....unless you like changing plugs every weekend and having the from cylinders gabble up all the air and the back one staving for air.......yes go with the single plane.....for sure if its force feed....N\a motors don't suffer to badly from this problem.....but when I was just a stroker motor there was still poor air distribution...I could see it by just looking at the plugs

Last edited by otherwhitemeat; 06-05-2008 at 09:18 PM.
Old 06-06-2008, 12:43 AM
  #36  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Tapout911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Paragould AR
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can take pics of all my plugs, they are identical after a pass. The cylinders can be tuned individually, Thanks Ed Wright for getting mine where they are. This may change with the n2o.
Old 06-06-2008, 01:24 AM
  #37  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Tapout911
I can take pics of all my plugs, they are identical after a pass. The cylinders can be tuned individually, Thanks Ed Wright for getting mine where they are. This may change with the n2o.
What ECU are you using?....N\a is not to bad with the stock style intake.
Old 06-06-2008, 01:29 AM
  #38  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Tapout911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Paragould AR
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its the stock 95 obd1. I have a converted single plan sittin on the floor in the garage. I may try it out eventually.
Old 06-06-2008, 09:18 AM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by otherwhitemeat
under 400rpms????? how often do you race someone under 4000 rpms....????
Uhh... I race under 4000 all the damn time. From a dead stop, how do you think you get going and up to the RPMs where HP takes over? TORQUE!
Old 06-06-2008, 09:55 AM
  #40  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
Colin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Wichita/Derby, KS
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Formula350
Uhh... I race under 4000 all the damn time. From a dead stop, how do you think you get going and up to the RPMs where HP takes over? TORQUE!
Well then you need a higher stall converter. Saying torque is king in drag racing makes me think that you read car craft magazine too much. Horsepower is what gets you down the track. Build your motor for nothing but torque, and it'll disappoint you at the track. Why do you think that GM ditched the long runner TPI motors after 92? And why do think all the guys that own TPI motors ditch their long runner intakes in favor of a Steath Ram, LT1 intake, of Single plane conversion?

Last edited by Colin91Z; 06-06-2008 at 10:00 AM.


Quick Reply: Possible new Intake manifold for LTX



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.