¿Cam to big for stock heads? 242 / 248, .584 / .579 113 LSA
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Macomb, Michigan
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
63-07-468-8 Comp Cams XFI LT1 Camshaft, 242 / 248, .584 / .579 113 LSA, Good midrange with excellent top end power. Headers, exhaust, gears, converter, computer tuning recommended.....is all they say needed to run this cam on thunderracing.com.
what does everyone think about that?
what does everyone think about that?
#4
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Macomb, Michigan
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
what about 63-07-467-8 Comp Cams XFI LT1 Camshaft, 230 / 236, .576 / .570 113 LSA, Strong mid-range and top end power. Headers, exhaust, gears, converter, computer tuning recommended.
#5
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
63-07-468-8 Comp Cams XFI LT1 Camshaft, 242 / 248, .584 / .579 113 LSA, Good midrange with excellent top end power. Headers, exhaust, gears, converter, computer tuning recommended.....is all they say needed to run this cam on thunderracing.com.
what does everyone think about that?
what does everyone think about that?
WD
Last edited by The Engineer; 06-19-2008 at 07:05 PM.
#6
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
WD
Trending Topics
#8
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The OP presumably has a stock shortblock to go with his stock heads and I posted a link to someone who has tried that cam on a 350.
Anyone with a clue knows added displacement lowers the rpm range of a cam.
I do not know if the ratio of displacement directly correlates to a percentage in rpm but if it does your 13% greater displacement would mean over 7300rpms if a 350 needs 13% more rpm to match.
My opinions are based on facts most of you choose to ignore or missinterpert, as this guy has choosen to ignore the post I linked, and ignore the displacement thing.
The cam I am running is smaller lift and duration than the second XFI listed even. I would stay below 230degrees intake on aa stock shortblock.
Anyone with a clue knows added displacement lowers the rpm range of a cam.
I do not know if the ratio of displacement directly correlates to a percentage in rpm but if it does your 13% greater displacement would mean over 7300rpms if a 350 needs 13% more rpm to match.
My opinions are based on facts most of you choose to ignore or missinterpert, as this guy has choosen to ignore the post I linked, and ignore the displacement thing.
The cam I am running is smaller lift and duration than the second XFI listed even. I would stay below 230degrees intake on aa stock shortblock.
#9
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't know anything about cams, and I figured it was way too big before clicking on the thread.
As far as making power with it on a stock motor, I'll have to say sure you would over stock, but you are not making anywhere near what it can. I'm sure not even 1/2 of it's potential has been released. Which I think is a part of what Caprice was saying about CID. *shrug*
Again, I don't know what I'm talking about, but I don't think you can flow enough air with the pistons to utilize that cam.
As far as making power with it on a stock motor, I'll have to say sure you would over stock, but you are not making anywhere near what it can. I'm sure not even 1/2 of it's potential has been released. Which I think is a part of what Caprice was saying about CID. *shrug*
Again, I don't know what I'm talking about, but I don't think you can flow enough air with the pistons to utilize that cam.
#11
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I really love the drama here. Two people who have “actually” run the Comp XFI cam and say it’s good cam choice with a reasonable power band around 6500 (even with 355 cubes).
And then several e-experts here on the forum who have “never run” the XFI cam (probable never even known anyone with it), but are sure it is a rotten cam choice.
However, I don’t recall any of those e-experts being the LTX Shoot-Out this year and actualling out-running anyone, me in particular in N/A!
WD
And then several e-experts here on the forum who have “never run” the XFI cam (probable never even known anyone with it), but are sure it is a rotten cam choice.
However, I don’t recall any of those e-experts being the LTX Shoot-Out this year and actualling out-running anyone, me in particular in N/A!
WD
#14
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Moore Oklahoma
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
12 Second Club
iTrader: (129)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr View Post
Absolutely horrible choice, to even attempt to use it you will need aftermarket injection. Comp's rpm ranges are way OFF, will need to go beyond 7000rpms.
I bet you've never run that XFI cam! But it have for two seasons now and power-band is "well below" the 7000 you've incorrectly stated.
WD
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr View Post
Absolutely horrible choice, to even attempt to use it you will need aftermarket injection. Comp's rpm ranges are way OFF, will need to go beyond 7000rpms.
I bet you've never run that XFI cam! But it have for two seasons now and power-band is "well below" the 7000 you've incorrectly stated.
WD
Sorry but Caprice is right. I have run it in a stock short block with Lingenfelter CNCd heads. Way to big for a 350" motor that has a limited capability of RPM. We spun it to 7,000 on the dyno and the curve was still going up. Who knows where it had peaked. My buddy ran it in his stock headed 383 after I sold it to him for a smaller cam and it was even a little on the big side for that. I would highly discourage running this cam in a 350" motor.
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
you're telling me you think either of those cams would be reasonable on a stock headed car...the first is no question, it would need RPM's well beyond a stock PCM and Opti can handle to work, and would but pretty gutless down low. The 2nd is still too big imo but hey..what do we all know, just trying to give good tried and true advice
#17
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I really love the drama here. Two people who have “actually” run the Comp XFI cam and say it’s good cam choice with a reasonable power band around 6500 (even with 355 cubes).
And then several e-experts here on the forum who have “never run” the XFI cam (probable never even known anyone with it), but are sure it is a rotten cam choice.
However, I don’t recall any of those e-experts being the LTX Shoot-Out this year and actualling out-running anyone, me in particular in N/A!
WD
And then several e-experts here on the forum who have “never run” the XFI cam (probable never even known anyone with it), but are sure it is a rotten cam choice.
However, I don’t recall any of those e-experts being the LTX Shoot-Out this year and actualling out-running anyone, me in particular in N/A!
WD
#19
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a similar cam going in to my car. its the XFI 242 intake lobe and an xtreme marine high lift 250* exhaust lobe. the seat to seat valve events are very similar to a GM847 (just much more aggressive lobes obviously). its also a stock headed 350. I specified I wanted a 4000-7000 rpm power band with stock heads. using a yank pt4000 stall, 4.10s, and about 150-200 lbs of weight reduction.
#20
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have the 466 in my 383 and shift at 6200.
for the author of this thread my $.02 is the XFI 465 would be better suited for his application if he wants a XFI grind.
what I have found is this cam grind wants "bee hive" springs.....as noted on it's cam card.
for the author of this thread my $.02 is the XFI 465 would be better suited for his application if he wants a XFI grind.
what I have found is this cam grind wants "bee hive" springs.....as noted on it's cam card.