future of shifting for T56?
Liberty performs the "faceplating" procedure on stock gears by removing the synchros and replacing them with "dog rings."
Other companies (PPG, G-Force) offer custom gears, input and main shafts that already have dog-rings on them. This is the expensive option but can handle a lot more power.
Andrew
Overall operation will be fairly similar though.
And as long as the welding process for the faceplating etc is robust, then they OEM T56 gears are well proven for their strength.
Value for money they are hard to beat.
I only got mine done late last year, so only have limited mileage on them. I'll be pissed if it breaks though !
Overall operation will be fairly similar though.
And as long as the welding process for the faceplating etc is robust, then they OEM T56 gears are well proven for their strength.
Value for money they are hard to beat.
I only got mine done late last year, so only have limited mileage on them. I'll be pissed if it breaks though !
Here is a Liberty faceplated TKO 600:

Look at the "dogs" on the gears and sliders.
Now look at the PPG parts:

Same exact design...
Here is a Richmond 6 sod that was done by Liberty:
The picture above is great because you can see 5th and 6th gears on the right that still use synchronizers, so you can see the difference.
You are conflating design, with cost, with value. The difference in cost comes from the amount of custom parts needed. The Liberty mod uses stock gears, while the PPG gear set includes a bunch of gears, shafts, etc...hence the higher price and higher torque rating. I am not knocking the Liberty set-up at all. I had one of their dog-ring T56s in 2006...
Andrew
But cost matters, especially when T56 gear strength is already well proven.
It just makes aftermarket gears hard tjustify.
Take g force....they're expensive too and have their fair share of failures...you'd need to be damn sure any other setx were strong.
Yes, even the strongest and most costly multi-million buck sequentials on the planet (in F1) MUST cut power to shift and survive (hence that explosive crash sound every time they up shift, at least on the older, NA formula ones).
I was just hyped about not having to use the clutch on shifts, and as you've also stated about the wear and maintenance involved with a true sequential, especially on a daily driven, used in stop and go traffic one.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
But cost matters, especially when T56 gear strength is already well proven.
It just makes aftermarket gears hard tjustify.
Take g force....they're expensive too and have their fair share of failures...you'd need to be damn sure any other setx were strong.
Andrew
Andrew
But the physical makeup of the shift parts is different, the number of dogs, their spacing and basic design.
In some ways from a wear/tear perspective the FP is better as when worn, they could be cut off and new parts welded on.
With a conventional dog setup, the gear with the integrated dogs will need replaced.
So maintenance would also be cheaper with the FP setup.
But I'd still, say for a daily driver, it would be annoying. It's nice in traffic etc to sometimes to drop into neutral, or miss the odd gear or two.
But with the sequential, you must always go up down through gears, you cant miss any. Obviously you dont need to release the clutch each time, but each gear physically needs to be selected before moving to the next.










