Manual Transmission T56 | T5 | MN12 | Clutches | Hydraulics | Shifters

Tremec T-56 Magnum "F" - Please Tell Me this is real!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2020, 05:36 AM
  #61  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

If you want one with old F Body ratios, then buy one with them. You may need someone to build it for you though at additional cost. Not sure if Tremec themselves offer it yet.

Sounds like a lot of the gearing issues you talk about are down to not enough power if you've only 450. That needs fixed lol.

As for fuel economy, the 0.63 vs 0.5 6th gear really isnt going to make any difference at all.
Old 01-25-2020, 07:26 AM
  #62  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,687
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
If you want one with old F Body ratios, then buy one with them. You may need someone to build it for you though at additional cost. Not sure if Tremec themselves offer it yet.

Sounds like a lot of the gearing issues you talk about are down to not enough power if you've only 450. That needs fixed lol.

As for fuel economy, the 0.63 vs 0.5 6th gear really isnt going to make any difference at all.
Im confused how power will help the 2.97 gear set, seems like on a street radial more power makes it worse. I get why a heavy 5th gen needs that gear set, but not a 700 pound lighter 4th. I'm working on a 600 wheel hp build, so taking care of that issue lol....no I used the 450 reference because that's what I'm coming off of......just seems like for a 95 percent street vehicle the f body ratios are pretty on point, best of both worlds....why ruin it? I can see a use for the 80 63 gears for a higher speed track car tho, and seems like this f magnum is more favored to swaps then an actual 4th gen. It is a 20 plus year old platform so in theory that makes sense, Just seems silly that I would need to open up a new trans just to get F body ratios.....

side note, is my fully built t56 not goona like shifting at 7300 with a monster single disk race clutch.
Old 01-25-2020, 07:29 AM
  #63  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,687
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts

Default

And the .63 final gear issues I have is 50 percent revving higher and being louder than necessary, 30 percent engine is completing more cycles per minute than necessary which in the long run adds to more wear and tear right.....and 20 percent fuel which like u said won't be more than 2 mpg give or take

i loved my built ls1 and all but with the dumps it eventually gets a little loud on 3 hour road trips which the .50 gear would help

Last edited by Floorman279; 01-25-2020 at 07:30 AM. Reason: .......
Old 01-25-2020, 09:48 AM
  #64  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

A move from 0.5 to 0.63 is not 50%. Unless overall as you refer to rpm, you must be using a pretty short diff too ?

Pretty sure the 0.5 tall 6th was only ever put in place for emissions reasons so they could claim the cars were clean or pass tests at a cruise speed.

But yes, when I had the tall 6th in mine I thought it was good...but really, after changing to the Magnum any increase in rpm really is no big deal at all. With hindsight, 6th was always a little tall ( Even if on occasion I looked for a 7th lol )
5th however did serve me well for top speed stuff, as it enabled me to hit 200+ in 5th. Well....until 5th gear exploded lol. Twice. I did think I compromised with the shorter Magnum 5th...but as I'd never do a mile again, and doubt I'd try for 200+...the shorter would be better suited to say a 1/2 mile now anyway. And the shorter gear will be stronger.
So it was all win for the shorter gearset Magnum,. I would not opt for the 2.97 though, it just leaves too big a step from 1-2, and 2-3.

Certainly a decade or so ago when I had a "built" T56 and ran a single disc Textralia OZ700 single disc, I had no issue shifting at 7-7300rpm. I didnt shift there all the time, but did hang on on quite a few occasions and rarely did I ever have any issues.
So a T56 in good condition with good oil and clutch....can do it.

But a Magnum is going to be better. And there's no question it's stronger.
Old 01-25-2020, 12:18 PM
  #65  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,687
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
A move from 0.5 to 0.63 is not 50%. Unless overall as you refer to rpm, you must be using a pretty short diff too ?

Pretty sure the 0.5 tall 6th was only ever put in place for emissions reasons so they could claim the cars were clean or pass tests at a cruise speed.

But yes, when I had the tall 6th in mine I thought it was good...but really, after changing to the Magnum any increase in rpm really is no big deal at all. With hindsight, 6th was always a little tall ( Even if on occasion I looked for a 7th lol )
5th however did serve me well for top speed stuff, as it enabled me to hit 200+ in 5th. Well....until 5th gear exploded lol. Twice. I did think I compromised with the shorter Magnum 5th...but as I'd never do a mile again, and doubt I'd try for 200+...the shorter would be better suited to say a 1/2 mile now anyway. And the shorter gear will be stronger.
So it was all win for the shorter gearset Magnum,. I would not opt for the 2.97 though, it just leaves too big a step from 1-2, and 2-3.

Certainly a decade or so ago when I had a "built" T56 and ran a single disc Textralia OZ700 single disc, I had no issue shifting at 7-7300rpm. I didnt shift there all the time, but did hang on on quite a few occasions and rarely did I ever have any issues.
So a T56 in good condition with good oil and clutch....can do it.

But a Magnum is going to be better. And there's no question it's stronger.
not sure where u though I said 50 percent loss from .50 to .63...

yea honestly I love where my gearing is now with 3.89s......perfect. and I can change to a 3.40 rear gear and make the magnum 1 to 4 very close to my current but the .63 is still too short imo with 3.40s
Old 01-25-2020, 06:06 PM
  #66  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,546
Received 3,615 Likes on 2,214 Posts

Default

From my T56 to my magnum (.50 6th to .63 6th) my rpms went up about 200 at 70 mph. I’ve been doing a lot of street tuning lately and finding out that I can really string out my mileage at cruise with tuning. My startup tune was set up very rich across the board, so we’ve been pulling fuel out a lot. Using a wideband of course. You can really tune for max mileage at cruise if you want more mpg. I’m running a 3.73 rear and I’m about to go to a 3.90. I need more gear for roll racing. I don’t care about the mileage deal, as this car won’t ever go over a 300 mile round trip. But it would be cool to have a 434 with this kind of power that got decent mileage.
Old 01-25-2020, 07:15 PM
  #67  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,687
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
From my T56 to my magnum (.50 6th to .63 6th) my rpms went up about 200 at 70 mph. I’ve been doing a lot of street tuning lately and finding out that I can really string out my mileage at cruise with tuning. My startup tune was set up very rich across the board, so we’ve been pulling fuel out a lot. Using a wideband of course. You can really tune for max mileage at cruise if you want more mpg. I’m running a 3.73 rear and I’m about to go to a 3.90. I need more gear for roll racing. I don’t care about the mileage deal, as this car won’t ever go over a 300 mile round trip. But it would be cool to have a 434 with this kind of power that got decent mileage.
yea the 3.90 will be almost 450rpms more in 6th gear id imagine
Old 01-25-2020, 08:02 PM
  #68  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,546
Received 3,615 Likes on 2,214 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
yea the 3.90 will be almost 450rpms more in 6th gear id imagine
Just over 400 according to my math. I’m right at 1700 now so 2125ish at 70mph.
Old 01-25-2020, 08:51 PM
  #69  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,687
Received 162 Likes on 132 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
Just over 400 according to my math. I’m right at 1700 now so 2125ish at 70mph.
yea that's not bad if that's ur personal cruising speed.....mines just a,little higher
Old 01-31-2020, 05:09 PM
  #70  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Not a lot of real info though

Old 05-18-2020, 09:25 PM
  #71  
TECH Enthusiast
 
eddielb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Anyone ever get one? Does the tranny shift better than a regular t56? Any deals in socal?
Old 05-19-2020, 07:31 AM
  #72  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,851 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by eddielb
Anyone ever get one? Does the tranny shift better than a regular t56? Any deals in socal?
In this thread, user Che70velle. he's posted specifics of his experience with it. Seems to like it alot.
Old 07-22-2020, 09:40 PM
  #73  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,993
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

What's the purpose of the oiler in the TR6060? If desired, is there a way to add that oiler to this Magnum-F? How would the oiler be integrated with the remainder of the F-body to make it functional?
Old 07-23-2020, 04:38 AM
  #74  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

https://www.bowlertransmissions.com/...m-pump-ugrade/

Although this that requires an external pump, has many clear advantages in terms of oiling the front gears for those vehicles that launch very hard.

https://www.tickperformance.com/tick...te-t56-magnum/
Old 11-24-2020, 02:08 PM
  #75  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Turtle Bite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: WA
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got my Magnum F in, does anybody know what the sensor near the front of the passenger side is for? I don't recall having that on my stock F-body T-56. Would be nice if it came with even some basic paperwork, but oh well. It has been bolt in so far, unfortunately it may have to come back out as the tail housing is leaking. I think I will just re-seal it myself rather than trying to warranty, as I did not notice until I already had the trans in the car. Probably easier than shipping back to Tremec.
Old 11-24-2020, 05:16 PM
  #76  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Post a picture of what you refer to,

There is no sensor on the front right, although that is where the reverse light switch goes same as a T56.
Old 12-21-2020, 08:17 PM
  #77  
Launching!
iTrader: (16)
 
Blksilvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 221
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Hi Where is the best price for the Magnum F ? Any one have part numbers for the tranny ?



Quick Reply: Tremec T-56 Magnum "F" - Please Tell Me this is real!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.