Military Hotrod Club For our members in the Armed Forces

Grunts vs Support...thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2009 | 02:48 AM
  #21  
Daredevil_TA's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lewis, WA.
Default

Originally Posted by 325trooper
I didn't see any support troops humping up the mountains in Afghanistan with me. And now Afghanistan is the main battle field. It's kind of amusing, support units will get shot at on convoys in Iraq or work a checkpoint and now everyone claims they are doing the same job as the infantry. Not exactly the case. I was on a convoy once in Iraq with a support unit. We started taking fire and they floored it out of the kill zone instead of standing and fighting and naturally the enemy melted back to where they came from to fight another day. I asked why they didn't stop and they looked at me like I was crazy. It was actually their SOP to leave the kill zone. Last I checked they get the same combat pay as the grunts.


We may all get the same pay but we all don't have the same mission. Their mission was probably to get something from point A to point B. They're not gonna stop a whole convoy just to take pop shots at a bunch of insurgents because thats not thier job. Its the infantry's mission to find the insurgents and kill or detain them. They wouldnt expect you to fix a truck that broke down or use a wrecker to tow it back so you shouldn't expect them to stay in a killzone an risk failing the mission just to attempt to kill insurgents.
Old 04-19-2009 | 12:12 PM
  #22  
Magic Man's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Augusta Ks.
Default

Every skill is needed to make it work but if the **** hits the fan everyone is a rifleman.
Old 04-20-2009 | 12:24 AM
  #23  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,853
Likes: 317
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Daredevil_TA
We may all get the same pay but we all don't have the same mission. Their mission was probably to get something from point A to point B. They're not gonna stop a whole convoy just to take pop shots at a bunch of insurgents because thats not thier job. Its the infantry's mission to find the insurgents and kill or detain them. They wouldnt expect you to fix a truck that broke down or use a wrecker to tow it back so you shouldn't expect them to stay in a killzone an risk failing the mission just to attempt to kill insurgents.
For my unit, the reason behind that SOP is because of secondary explosives. One would disable/destroy a vehicle, then another larger IED would detonate as the area was "secured." Eventually, we learned to just get the hell out of the kill zone. I don't know how enemy TTP's have evolved since 2004, but that worked for us then.

In my experiences in the box, everyone was a soldier. There wasn't much of a differentiation between grunts and POG's. That machismo bullshit was left behind in the garrison. A lot of us support guys went on the same missions, patrols, and raids as the combat units we supported. Everyone was a soldier.
Old 04-20-2009 | 01:22 PM
  #24  
Daredevil_TA's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lewis, WA.
Default

Exactly-Get the hell outta the killzone-thats basically what i was getting at, theres no reason to stay an fight in an ambush if all vehicles are still able to roll out, you'll only risk creating more casualties.
Old 04-22-2009 | 10:35 AM
  #25  
96ta's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Carson, Colorado Springs
Default

Originally Posted by shandy294
SOP to leave the kill zone...is that new? I knew a guy who was signal but volunteered to be a convoy gunner his whole tour. Anyone on the road had to provide for his own defense as far as I remember. We were a signal detachment and would travel in a jeep or 2-1/2 sometimes. Nothing happened so I guess it was fairly pacified at the time.
i was doing road missions as a signal soldier my first tour and our sop was to if in contact return fire if we had pid and continue to push through the kill zone. that was mostly our bde sop policy. they told us to leave the grunt work to the grunts. funny thing though is i was in an stb unit and we had mp's, mi, grunts, the works so i never really understood why.
Old 04-27-2009 | 02:00 AM
  #26  
z28MP's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Fort stewart GA
Default

The company that replaced us was only like 70% combat ready or whatever the term was they had cooks, mechanics, commo and their pak clerks go out with them. We werent grunts, but we went to the IP stations went through the villages towns mounted and dismounted as well as man check points. As said before every MOS is needed. Even if its something you think is gay and stupid. Do you really want to do that stupid gay **** after spending all day outside the wire?
Old 04-27-2009 | 07:20 PM
  #27  
Petraszewsky's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 895
Likes: 1
From: USA
Default

Sgt Drags said it perfectly... 11B is the oldest military profession...Why is everyone else in the Army/Military??? To support the Infantry... Think about it.. and Fobbits are worst in that most of them are POGs...and I remember going to FOB chow hall one day after a 16 HR OP then leaving there to pull security on a bridge that blew outside Ramadi for another 8 hrs..I hadn't showered in like a week or ate during most of that time period. Well anyways me and my sqaud go to the chow hall just happy to sit down with no gear and eat...There were people COMPLAINING about not having ice cream..Or that the chow hall was too hot.... not all but most POGs are useless... IMO

Last edited by Petraszewsky; 04-30-2009 at 05:37 PM.



Quick Reply: Grunts vs Support...thoughts?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.