Ferrari 360 on the Dyno
12-22-2003, 11:49 PM
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: STL
Posts: 3,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ferrari 360 on the Dyno http://www.dynoauthority.com/videos/.../dynorun1.mpeg
The numbers were not all that impressive, but ya can't beat the sound
2004 360 Challenge-Stradale (US Version)
Assembly Number: 50457
Miles: 1157 miles
Curb Weight: 3000lb (owner’s manual) / 3096lb (measured)
HP (flywheel): 409 hp / 8500 rpm (owner’s manual)
Torque (flywheel): 275 lb. ft. / 4750 rpm (owner’s manual)
Dyno: Mustang Dyne (DynoAuthority http://www.dynoauthority.com/ )
Measurement Standard: SAE (J1349)
Max. HP (rear wheels): 320.4 HP @ 8500 RPM
Max. Torque (rear wheel): 233.2 Ft-lbs @ 5750 RPM
Parasitic Torque: 32 ft-lbs (measured through coast-down run)
Coast-down Loss: 14%
The numbers were not all that impressive, but ya can't beat the sound
2004 360 Challenge-Stradale (US Version)
Assembly Number: 50457
Miles: 1157 miles
Curb Weight: 3000lb (owner’s manual) / 3096lb (measured)
HP (flywheel): 409 hp / 8500 rpm (owner’s manual)
Torque (flywheel): 275 lb. ft. / 4750 rpm (owner’s manual)
Dyno: Mustang Dyne (DynoAuthority http://www.dynoauthority.com/ )
Measurement Standard: SAE (J1349)
Max. HP (rear wheels): 320.4 HP @ 8500 RPM
Max. Torque (rear wheel): 233.2 Ft-lbs @ 5750 RPM
Parasitic Torque: 32 ft-lbs (measured through coast-down run)
Coast-down Loss: 14%
12-23-2003, 10:21 AM
#4
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia!
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
8500 rpm, humm, it took forever to get there and it sounded like he was in 5th gear. I'm not impressed at all by the sound. But the little horsey is cute.
Trending Topics
12-23-2003, 06:49 PM
#14
!LS1 11 Second Club
Nice car. Sounds cool too when rowing through the gears. The sustained high rev blender sound did sound retarded though. But hey, bottom line we know we all would like to have one.
12-23-2003, 07:40 PM
#15
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it's revving to 8500rpm, so the torque is fine. torque X rpms= power.
so you can either get power by rpms or torque, and with a Ferrari you want it to rev at least 8k.
so you can either get power by rpms or torque, and with a Ferrari you want it to rev at least 8k.
12-24-2003, 04:04 AM
#18
TECH Addict
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The car is made for canyon runs, not straight line.
It's also made for top speed, not crossing traps.
The car is awesome and can hand most cars their asses on a road course. This car has a steering wheel for a reason.
It's also made for top speed, not crossing traps.
The car is awesome and can hand most cars their asses on a road course. This car has a steering wheel for a reason.
12-24-2003, 11:00 AM
#20
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the car is beautiful myself. Would I like to own one? Sure, if I didn't have to pay for it.
If it came time to spend the money on a car (and I had the money) I would get a ZO6. A ZO6 would whoop that Ferraris *** in almost every performance area and leave me alot of money left over for mods.
If it came time to spend the money on a car (and I had the money) I would get a ZO6. A ZO6 would whoop that Ferraris *** in almost every performance area and leave me alot of money left over for mods.