Boost Logic Sets New Supra Record at TX2K10
03-25-2010, 01:06 PM
#41
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Big Terrible Texas
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The difference between running an 8.50 and a 7.50 in the 1/4 is huge. Like people are saying, you are trying to compare apples to oranges. Not gonna work.
03-25-2010, 01:12 PM
#42
I don't see where the bench racing took place? I posted a reply to the kat with the Porsche vids who seemed to think he was proving something. Now you're here sticking up for him because you fanboys gotta stick together. Why don't you quit bench racing and telling me to that fast N/A. If I had the money I would... I'm on Ls1tech sorry for being biased towards American cars. As everyone knows it's easy to make power with turbos. The only thing it takes is money.
ON a side note. I'd like to see Boost Logic take their Supra on Drag Week.
Oh yeah, just so you guys will quit bitching about it.
Congrats Boost, your supra is quick.
ON a side note. I'd like to see Boost Logic take their Supra on Drag Week.
Oh yeah, just so you guys will quit bitching about it.
Congrats Boost, your supra is quick.
03-25-2010, 01:21 PM
#43
8 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Friendswood
Posts: 10,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Zac you are an idiot if you think it's easy to make power on turbos... Making power N/A is a **** ton easier. You obviously have never touched any kind of tuning software...
As far as being on an American car site doesn't give you any right to be a retard...
I've been on this site since day 2 (Registered User # 13) and have owned plenty of cars in between and you don't see me posting ignorant ****.
As far as being on an American car site doesn't give you any right to be a retard...
I've been on this site since day 2 (Registered User # 13) and have owned plenty of cars in between and you don't see me posting ignorant ****.
03-25-2010, 04:02 PM
#45
Agreed. My point was give credit where credit is due. Not start some dumbass argument about N/A v. FI.
Anything will go fast when you put MONEY in it. Correct, not my fault you aren't in a position to do so yourself. Which is why I would assume you can appreciate a 7.5 pass @ 189MPH all the same? I do, I saw it in person and it was bad ***
Anything will go fast when you put MONEY in it. Correct, not my fault you aren't in a position to do so yourself. Which is why I would assume you can appreciate a 7.5 pass @ 189MPH all the same? I do, I saw it in person and it was bad ***
03-25-2010, 04:14 PM
#46
Zac you are an idiot if you think it's easy to make power on turbos... Making power N/A is a **** ton easier. You obviously have never touched any kind of tuning software...
As far as being on an American car site doesn't give you any right to be a retard...
I've been on this site since day 2 (Registered User # 13) and have owned plenty of cars in between and you don't see me posting ignorant ****.
As far as being on an American car site doesn't give you any right to be a retard...
I've been on this site since day 2 (Registered User # 13) and have owned plenty of cars in between and you don't see me posting ignorant ****.
04-10-2010, 06:38 PM
#49
Staging Troll
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: beaver PA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
zac-speed..supras are runing IRS, they suck at drag racing..the crap you talking has to do with STRAIGHT AXLE cars with larger slicks..
7.59, with 1.2x 60ft out of a irs car with small slicks is amazing imo..with a 6slamer and a huge turbo (most guys use a 200-300 shot to spool the turbos..) making 1500+rwhp (1700-1800crank hp i believe)
7.59, with 1.2x 60ft out of a irs car with small slicks is amazing imo..with a 6slamer and a huge turbo (most guys use a 200-300 shot to spool the turbos..) making 1500+rwhp (1700-1800crank hp i believe)
04-10-2010, 06:39 PM
#50
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 996's are very affordable now (at least when compared to their sticker price).
The only bad thing I've heard about them is that some of their engines tend to have RMS and other serious engine failure issues. I don't know if that is just the NA 3.4 or if it includes the turbo 3.6 though...
You hear anything about that Powell?
Man, I would love to have an AWD turbo H6 car.
The only bad thing I've heard about them is that some of their engines tend to have RMS and other serious engine failure issues. I don't know if that is just the NA 3.4 or if it includes the turbo 3.6 though...
You hear anything about that Powell?
Man, I would love to have an AWD turbo H6 car.
