2011 5.0 vs 2011 ss
OK, lets slow it down a little for you as you should be used to that; (doing things slower). Lets say the test was of the 1992 cars and one was the auto only z28 and you had to pit it against the auto dogpiss slow comparitive 1992 5.0. You'd be 'upset' as you KNEW the auto 5.0 was a poor runner.
The auto SS makes LESS power than the normal one and everyone and their mother knows that a stock auto trans isn't performance oriented. Now Ford is at their a-game with the SAME HP offered in that car with a trans that is more suited stall wise to a dig esp with the gear.
Is the auto version of the mustang hands down faster than the SS? YES. You bet your *** it is. No argument there. Could a REAL mustang GT get around a REAL SS or vice versa is the question. No roadtest ever picks the auto cars as they never perform as well on open track duty aswell as straightline unless it was designed as an auto only platform.
By trying to remove 'driver error' they watered down any real excitement to be had. Who knows if they were allowed to brake torque or just floor it or what. Get two of the GOOD ones out and run them again. THAT is the test I want to see.
Now you can return to crying why no one wants to see mustangs on an Fbody forum. Read my sig ********...I freaking HAVE one
+1
some just don't accept the truth that ford can make faster mustang.
now that's a good competition for GM .
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Looks like some people are seriously but hurt by this news.






