Nitroused383

iTrader: (10)

Lol not by any stock car I wouldn't. It was a demonstration of power under the curve, which a ton of setups lack.

AznMuscle

iTrader: (7)

Nitroused383, I wanna see a dyno sheet. That under the curve power is damn nice though. I know you gave the number, but I wanna see a graph and try to visualize it against my graph, and lack of torque lol.

Nitroused383

iTrader: (10)

Posted results last friday check it out https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...nderdrive.html There are some comparison graphs from my old results if you scroll down a few posts. Your lack of torque is from poor dynamic compression and valve events of your cam.

AznMuscle

iTrader: (7)

Yea, I realize this, though I went with this cam for straight top end power, not under the curve. I was thinking of going with a reverse split, but I wont worry about that with this particular car. Another build with a lsx will be all torque though.

Nitroused383

iTrader: (10)

Don't ever do that My lil cam pulls to 6800 rpm, probably even 7k if I wanted to stretch it that far. Valve events are far more important than cam size.

lemons12

iTrader: (71)

Why would you not ever do that? If someone wants to stay cam only and is on a budget a reverse split is a very good alternative and can make some sick numbers on a pretty basic setup.

AznMuscle

iTrader: (7)

Well since I need to pull my motor anyway, the new set up should make the torque I want

Nitroused383

iTrader: (10)

Got the midwest chassis 9" installed with 4.11's. Just screwing around on closed course private back roads, but why in the hell did M6's not come with 4.11's

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUAvZZar3JM

BlkBird2000

iTrader: (10)

Went from 135 to 120 at the end of 4th. Welcome to the 4:10+ gear club!