2011 Mustang GT vs 2010 Camaro SS vs SRT8 Challenger Vid
04-12-2010, 07:06 PM
#22
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back on topic TROLL!!
04-13-2010, 02:16 AM
#24
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do believe the specs/improvements for the '11 Camaros have been released, and there are no gearing or power improvements. So the '11 GT still beats the '11 SS. Maybe they will test a 3.55-geared Mustang against a '11 SS. We'll see what happens then. Till them, stop whining.
04-13-2010, 07:45 PM
#25
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: grand island, ne
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just to clear up the BS my stock SS comes with 3.45s and the first 5.0 with the standard 3.31s that wants it lightweight *** kicked in can come look me up. It is a good thing that ford offers a 3.73, but to claim it gets 26 mpg with them is BS. We all know that 26 mpg figure is with the standard 3.31s.........and u can bet ur *** you can add a good 5 tenths to that 1/4 mile time considering it has no low end torque. why else do you think they use the deepest gear of the 3 they offer to take on chevy and dodge.
and dodge? 3.90s and still that slow? Wow! not to mention the 46 grand price ticket.
and dodge? 3.90s and still that slow? Wow! not to mention the 46 grand price ticket.
04-13-2010, 07:56 PM
#26
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
$46k is fully loaded. And if you think there's gonna be a half-second difference between a 3.73-geared car and a 3.31-geared car, I'd take that bet. I always wouldn't say it has "no low end torque." It might be a little less than an LS3, but it's not exactly "low."
04-13-2010, 07:58 PM
#27
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do believe the specs/improvements for the '11 Camaros have been released, and there are no gearing or power improvements. So the '11 GT still beats the '11 SS. Maybe they will test a 3.55-geared Mustang against a '11 SS. We'll see what happens then. Till them, stop whining.
04-13-2010, 07:59 PM
#28
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: grand island, ne
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im just sayin that with the 3.31 that are standard that car isnt going to roll out NEARLY as good as the 3.73s. and as rev happy as the 5.0 is it is going to hurt it more than a guy thinks, because obviously the camaro really makes up ground on it in the last half of the track.
04-13-2010, 08:01 PM
#29
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: grand island, ne
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and as for the fully loaded camaro minus the ugly ground effects its 38,500. the reason in know that is because mine is fully loaded.
Just sayin it shouldn't even be in the comparison
Just sayin it shouldn't even be in the comparison
04-13-2010, 08:02 PM
#30
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75962
This info was also in one of the many '11 Mustang GT threads on this forum. No anticipated track-package or power improvements.
This info was also in one of the many '11 Mustang GT threads on this forum. No anticipated track-package or power improvements.
04-13-2010, 08:05 PM
#31
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: grand island, ne
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75962
This info was also in one of the many '11 Mustang GT threads on this forum. No anticipated track-package or power improvements.
This info was also in one of the many '11 Mustang GT threads on this forum. No anticipated track-package or power improvements.
yeah thats all ive seen also, but dont rule out the possibility of anything else.
04-13-2010, 08:24 PM
#33
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: grand island, ne
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-14-2010, 02:38 AM
#35
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-14-2010, 06:43 AM
#36
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.insideline.com/features/b...lenger-rt.html <-------- "BUT ITS GOT A BIGGER MOTOR
"
"Cool... a burnout..
04-15-2010, 02:00 PM
#37
Teching In
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why are you guys still crying?! It's just stock for stock, lmfao. We all know that the ls3 will respond a lot better to bolt ons than it's Ford counterpart. That's not even a debate, BUT stock for stock, the Mustang GT beats the SS. Cool?
04-15-2010, 02:13 PM
#38
