Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

2011 GT in the 10's N/A

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2010, 02:55 AM
  #161  
Launching!
iTrader: (19)
 
1979transam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: arkansas
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by silverz28camaro
Very impressive, but I still have the new ford beat with my N/A car.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX6Gj2lR7mo
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Man whats done to that thing? that is a SLEEPER!
Old 06-17-2010, 12:05 PM
  #162  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
triche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any thing will run fast if you dump money into it. Its still a mustang GT and it still weighs what.....5,000 lbs lol
Old 06-17-2010, 12:07 PM
  #163  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
triche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1979transam
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Man whats done to that thing? that is a SLEEPER!
DAMN.... That is sick.
Old 06-17-2010, 12:59 PM
  #164  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by triche
Any thing will run fast if you dump money into it. Its still a mustang GT and it still weighs what.....5,000 lbs lol
Just under 3,600lbs, actually... nearly 300lbs lighter than the new Camaro SS .
Old 06-17-2010, 02:03 PM
  #165  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Just under 3,600lbs, actually... nearly 300lbs lighter than the new Camaro SS .
Listed curb weight for the BASE GT is 3603.

Curb weight for the camaro is listed at 3849 and 3860. (M6)

About 250 lbs.

Similarly optioned the difference is closer to 200 lbs.
Old 06-18-2010, 01:46 AM
  #166  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
TheBlackPlague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LIKE I SAID.. all the 10 sec passes were on nitrous.

.58 sec

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYsI4...eature=related
Old 06-18-2010, 04:11 AM
  #167  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not ever 10 pass was. They did a few N/A. The car that was doing it with spray was a different color was it not?
Old 06-18-2010, 11:53 AM
  #168  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheBlackPlague
LIKE I SAID.. all the 10 sec passes were on nitrous.

.58 sec

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYsI4...eature=related
Scientists are still performing tests but you may just be as dense as a black hole.
Old 06-18-2010, 07:26 PM
  #169  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,507
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Still waiting to see how much weight was taken out and what fuel was used.
Old 06-18-2010, 07:38 PM
  #170  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
Still waiting to see how much weight was taken out and what fuel was used.
If they really made this 10 second pass with a stock motor and no nitrous, my guess is that they took quite a bit of weight out some where (even though they claim to still have a full interior). Not sure how much you can take out of an S197 chassis without chopping it....so I'm kinda interested to see what the race weight was.
Old 06-18-2010, 07:59 PM
  #171  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The car is fast like it our not.This car shattered everyone's opinion on what they thought this little motor was capable of.Thats a little hard to swallow after being the undisputed bad *** motor ever made for what 12ve years.I will give Chevy that.But now its a different story,now they gotta be envious when they say 12.80's was bad *** with the stock air filter.Every half *** gt owner can do that now.Chevy will try to come back but they have to loose some weight.Why not make a retro nova with an ls3 solid rear axle 3200 lbs then it truly would be game over.The playing field has changed a bit....
Old 06-18-2010, 08:54 PM
  #172  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
ss1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft Lupton, CO
Posts: 1,507
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

They still havent beaten the stock 2010 camaro record though.
Old 06-18-2010, 09:04 PM
  #173  
Teching In
 
F8L BYT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville / Indianapolis
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Strictly Performance just went 9.96 @ 137 today. Hopefully there will be a video added soon! This is the first one in the 9's
Old 06-18-2010, 09:26 PM
  #174  
Registered User
 
5280stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheBlackPlague
LIKE I SAID.. all the 10 sec passes were on nitrous.

.58 sec

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYsI4...eature=related
Just go to EVO's website guy and read up. You'll see that NOBODY knows what has been taken out of the car. The ONLY info given out is it's a N/A pass with a more aggressive tune (maybe race gas) and some weight taken out of the car. That is it lol, all this guessing, and EVO shady with their mod lists is getting out of control. It is what it is, and the full story will be released in this August issues of MM & FF. take 2 sec and look it up
Old 06-18-2010, 11:34 PM
  #175  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
rtr2001ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We got one in the 9's now, I'm also smart enough not to start a new thread.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZopO...=youtube_gdata

Music in the vid gay, pulled following info from local forum:

Congrats to Richard Lelsz and Strictly Performance on running the first 9-second run with a 2011 5.0L Mustang GT.

The shop swapped out the stock six-speed manual trans for a C4 and then he plumbed a direct port nitrous system. Using prototype tuning software, Lelsz threw down 656 rwhp this morning on the dyno.

The white GT features upper and lower control arms, Bogarts all around, and the aforementioned parts.

Tonight during Test And Tune at Houston Raceway Park, Lelsz ran 9.96 at 137 mph right off the trailer! Congrats to the entire team on running so quickly with the shop ride and pushing the boundary even further.
Old 06-19-2010, 12:02 AM
  #176  
Teching In
 
Magic Tundra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rtr2001ss
We got one in the 9's now, I'm also smart enough not to start a new thread.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZopO...=youtube_gdata

Music in the vid gay, pulled following info from local forum:

Congrats to Richard Lelsz and Strictly Performance on running the first 9-second run with a 2011 5.0L Mustang GT.

The shop swapped out the stock six-speed manual trans for a C4 and then he plumbed a direct port nitrous system. Using prototype tuning software, Lelsz threw down 656 rwhp this morning on the dyno.

The white GT features upper and lower control arms, Bogarts all around, and the aforementioned parts.

Tonight during Test And Tune at Houston Raceway Park, Lelsz ran 9.96 at 137 mph right off the trailer! Congrats to the entire team on running so quickly with the shop ride and pushing the boundary even further.
That car is flying! Iam still waiting to see a camaro do that with no cam,no heads,with IRS and just spray!
Old 06-19-2010, 12:28 AM
  #177  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Magic Tundra
That car is flying! Iam still waiting to see a camaro do that with no cam,no heads,with IRS and just spray!
That will never happen. Simply because a motor with no heads or cam won't run...

But seriously, the right cam can be cheap and lead to even greater numbers with spray; it would be retarded to not swap it out.


That mustang is hauling *** though!
Old 06-19-2010, 04:30 AM
  #178  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So much for the statement that the new 5.0 wont take to mods as well as the 5th gen.
Old 06-20-2010, 01:55 PM
  #179  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
02SOMWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wallkill ,NY
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Very nice all out effort work done by a shop.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT8cV1LbRfw

here's video of a all out effort done by another shop. If the work is put in you can get the same results in either car
Old 06-20-2010, 02:51 PM
  #180  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02SOMWS6
Very nice all out effort work done by a shop.



here's video of a all out effort done by another shop. If the work is put in you can get the same results in either car
I always find it funny how many ppl on these boards will agree with this statement, but then will turn around and still try to make the case that one car is better than the other. I think it's been proven definitively now that both the new GT and the new Camaro will get it done down the strip with the right work done (and really....the same can be said for ANY car). They are both comparable stock, and they both get it done quite nicely both with and without power adders. Period.

So why are there still so many arguments? Oh.........I forgot........the never ending presence of fanboys.

Last edited by ThisBlood147; 06-20-2010 at 03:09 PM.



Quick Reply: 2011 GT in the 10's N/A



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.