1300 RWHP Twin Turbo Gallardo... x 3 Gallardos
#21
What you aren't getting is that those Lambos did the 250mph in 1 MILE! Which was just a race to see how fast you can go in 1 mile not overall top speed. The Veyron did a top speed test without a limitation on distance. The Veyron would NOT pull on those Lambos up top unless it had some decent mods as well.
#22
What you aren't getting is that those Lambos did the 250mph in 1 MILE! Which was just a race to see how fast you can go in 1 mile not overall top speed. The Veyron did a top speed test without a limitation on distance. The Veyron would NOT pull on those Lambos up top unless it had some decent mods as well.
#23
Aero plays a big factor up there, not too mention they could be close to otu of gear at those speeds too. If you have proof of their true top speed outside of 1 mile events, please provide it. I'd love to see that instead of speculation.
No, I actually got it just fine. Your reading comprehension skills just happen to be sub-par. I do understand the 1 mile thing (see bolded below).
No, I actually got it just fine. Your reading comprehension skills just happen to be sub-par. I do understand the 1 mile thing (see bolded below).
BTW...my reading comprehension is just fine. I know exactly what you are trying to say, but you are missing something...the 1 mile limit! I'd be willing to bet those Lambos could go another 15-20 mph, at least, for their top speed given enough track to do so.
#25
hell with enough power and jsut enough downforce for the short time you'd need it you could make a pinto be a 200mph drag car but surely not a sustained top speed
#26
those lambos would be floating everywhere too. they are a good aerodynamic car, but the veyron was built largely around aerodynamics so no contest as far as top speed.
hell with enough power and jsut enough downforce for the short time you'd need it you could make a pinto be a 200mph drag car but surely not a sustained top speed
hell with enough power and jsut enough downforce for the short time you'd need it you could make a pinto be a 200mph drag car but surely not a sustained top speed
Why is this even being argued.
#31
How do you know that? Has anyone piloted one in excess of 267mph? I remember when the shelby aero was supposed to crush the Veyron but no one would drive it that fast cause it was a deathwish untill they made a lot of changes, even then it was not stable like a veyron.
#32
as far as aerodynamics, a stock bodied third gen firebird went well over 270mph, i don't think the lambo will be prevented from beating the veyron due to aero...
#33
Apparently not, because that IS NOT THE TOP SPEED FOR THOSE LAMBOS!! That was all they could manage in one mile...give them 2 miles and see if the top speed isn't a bit higher.
BTW...my reading comprehension is just fine. I know exactly what you are trying to say, but you are missing something...the 1 mile limit! I'd be willing to bet those Lambos could go another 15-20 mph, at least, for their top speed given enough track to do so.
BTW...my reading comprehension is just fine. I know exactly what you are trying to say, but you are missing something...the 1 mile limit! I'd be willing to bet those Lambos could go another 15-20 mph, at least, for their top speed given enough track to do so.
I know, I wish you could.
those lambos would be floating everywhere too. they are a good aerodynamic car, but the veyron was built largely around aerodynamics so no contest as far as top speed.
hell with enough power and jsut enough downforce for the short time you'd need it you could make a pinto be a 200mph drag car but surely not a sustained top speed
hell with enough power and jsut enough downforce for the short time you'd need it you could make a pinto be a 200mph drag car but surely not a sustained top speed
The original Veyron topped out at 23x mph, and they found the extra ~20mph in aero, because at those speeds, aero is just as important as power.
Huh? The question was how a Veyron would do against these Lambos. I mean, ****, are they suppose to race for 20 miles or something or until engine failure? And there's no doubt these Lambos have a higher top speed than a Veyron and are a hell of a lot faster.
Why is this even being argued.
Why is this even being argued.
they are doing in excess of 250 mph in the standing mile. the veyron does 200-205 in the mile. if you really think the TT Lambos will not reach 267+ you've got to be kidding. Never said they would as stable and comfortable as a veyron at 267+, but they ARE capable of a higher top speed than the veyron. Just wait, someone will eventually break 267 at the mile in a lambo.
as far as aerodynamics, a stock bodied third gen firebird went well over 270mph, i don't think the lambo will be prevented from beating the veyron due to aero...
as far as aerodynamics, a stock bodied third gen firebird went well over 270mph, i don't think the lambo will be prevented from beating the veyron due to aero...
Oh, and as for the bold, I wouldn't be surprised one bit. Everyone is misconstruing what I am saying, which is the cause for this continued shitfest.
#34
Ok, done arguing.
#35
Those things are incredible. It's safe to say that a RWD car making the same power won't stand a chance against one of those, purely because of how well those things put the power to the ground.
#36
#37
OK!
I have done the research for us! I have taken a *stock* gallardo's egar ratios tire size redline and all that and calculated the top speed for us...
RPM 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
6500 64 88 115 144 174 201
6600 65 89 117 147 176 204
6700 66 91 118 149 179 207
6800 67 92 120 151 182 211
6900 68 94 122 153 184 214
7000 69 95 124 155 187 217
7100 69 96 125 158 190 220
7200 70 98 127 160 192 223
7300 71 99 129 162 195 226
7400 72 100 131 164 198 229
7500 73 102 132 166 200 232
7600 74 103 134 169 203 235
7700 75 104 136 171 206 238
7800 76 106 138 173 208 242
7900 77 107 140 175 211 245
8000 78 108 141 178 214 248
8100 79 110 143 180 216 251
251mph stock gearing assuming it had the power to pull to that speed (which obviously these do)
So, I dont think these cars have a higher top speed than a Veyron SS, or at least not using stock ratios
I have done the research for us! I have taken a *stock* gallardo's egar ratios tire size redline and all that and calculated the top speed for us...
RPM 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
6500 64 88 115 144 174 201
6600 65 89 117 147 176 204
6700 66 91 118 149 179 207
6800 67 92 120 151 182 211
6900 68 94 122 153 184 214
7000 69 95 124 155 187 217
7100 69 96 125 158 190 220
7200 70 98 127 160 192 223
7300 71 99 129 162 195 226
7400 72 100 131 164 198 229
7500 73 102 132 166 200 232
7600 74 103 134 169 203 235
7700 75 104 136 171 206 238
7800 76 106 138 173 208 242
7900 77 107 140 175 211 245
8000 78 108 141 178 214 248
8100 79 110 143 180 216 251
251mph stock gearing assuming it had the power to pull to that speed (which obviously these do)
So, I dont think these cars have a higher top speed than a Veyron SS, or at least not using stock ratios
#39
they are doing in excess of 250 mph in the standing mile. the veyron does 200-205 in the mile. if you really think the TT Lambos will not reach 267+ you've got to be kidding. Never said they would as stable and comfortable as a veyron at 267+, but they ARE capable of a higher top speed than the veyron. Just wait, someone will eventually break 267 at the mile in a lambo.
as far as aerodynamics, a stock bodied third gen firebird went well over 270mph, i don't think the lambo will be prevented from beating the veyron due to aero...
as far as aerodynamics, a stock bodied third gen firebird went well over 270mph, i don't think the lambo will be prevented from beating the veyron due to aero...
OK!
I have done the research for us! I have taken a *stock* gallardo's egar ratios tire size redline and all that and calculated the top speed for us...
RPM 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
6500 64 88 115 144 174 201
6600 65 89 117 147 176 204
6700 66 91 118 149 179 207
6800 67 92 120 151 182 211
6900 68 94 122 153 184 214
7000 69 95 124 155 187 217
7100 69 96 125 158 190 220
7200 70 98 127 160 192 223
7300 71 99 129 162 195 226
7400 72 100 131 164 198 229
7500 73 102 132 166 200 232
7600 74 103 134 169 203 235
7700 75 104 136 171 206 238
7800 76 106 138 173 208 242
7900 77 107 140 175 211 245
8000 78 108 141 178 214 248
8100 79 110 143 180 216 251
251mph stock gearing assuming it had the power to pull to that speed (which obviously these do)
So, I dont think these cars have a higher top speed than a Veyron SS, or at least not using stock ratios
I have done the research for us! I have taken a *stock* gallardo's egar ratios tire size redline and all that and calculated the top speed for us...
RPM 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
6500 64 88 115 144 174 201
6600 65 89 117 147 176 204
6700 66 91 118 149 179 207
6800 67 92 120 151 182 211
6900 68 94 122 153 184 214
7000 69 95 124 155 187 217
7100 69 96 125 158 190 220
7200 70 98 127 160 192 223
7300 71 99 129 162 195 226
7400 72 100 131 164 198 229
7500 73 102 132 166 200 232
7600 74 103 134 169 203 235
7700 75 104 136 171 206 238
7800 76 106 138 173 208 242
7900 77 107 140 175 211 245
8000 78 108 141 178 214 248
8100 79 110 143 180 216 251
251mph stock gearing assuming it had the power to pull to that speed (which obviously these do)
So, I dont think these cars have a higher top speed than a Veyron SS, or at least not using stock ratios
I dont disagree that is has the power and aerodynamics to go that fast though.
#40
Depending on your particular taste for power, the custom performance package installed on your vehicle may vary from this particular listing. Further modifications include stronger rear driveshafts and reinforced CV joints, a Tilton Engineering triple-disc carbon clutch and flywheel, a GReddy electronic boost controller mounted in the glovebox, a triple adjustable Penske coil-over suspension, Motech or AEM electronics, a taller final drive ratio to increase top speed and a reworked transmission with new, hardened billet steel gears.
taken from the UG site. they have the gear they need as well
taken from the UG site. they have the gear they need as well