Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

1100+ HP Stock 4.8 short block in new HotRod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2011, 03:19 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (52)
 
TPI TERROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SGV, So Cal
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Impressive!!
Old 07-17-2011, 03:36 PM
  #22  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
BLINGOLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeland floirda
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The thing that gets me is the ebay turbo kit! But ya I think if the motr was in a car under real world conditions the thing wouldn't last.
Old 07-17-2011, 07:12 PM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (52)
 
TPI TERROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SGV, So Cal
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Any links?
Old 07-17-2011, 08:16 PM
  #24  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
McNasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Whatever the circumstances are, it made legit power for a good number of runs, props to them and GM at the same time.
Old 07-17-2011, 08:27 PM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1ya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: L.A.
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Wait.... Why wouldn't it last. If it makes the power it makes the power. The only reason would be just plain abuse. But what do I know.
Old 07-18-2011, 10:27 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
flippincamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: tn
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

we currently have 2 6.0 engines stock internals, One in a mustang running 14#s an a 100 shot, Mine in my full size chevy truck obs, running 12#s as of right now till we get the ice chest filled an tires, we are turning it up slowly to 20#s very great engines for boost oh an we are using the ebay gt45 88 wannabe turbo no problems with em an one is 4 years old
Old 07-19-2011, 05:10 AM
  #27  
Ph.D. in HUBRIS
iTrader: (11)
 
custm2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls1ya
Wait.... Why wouldn't it last. If it makes the power it makes the power. The only reason would be just plain abuse. But what do I know.
A dyno is a consistant stress. Driving and launching are not at all consistant. You rev that bitch up and dump the clutch or trans brake and you don't think there is 100x more stress then just sitting on a dyno cart.

It is still extreamly impressive that it made the power it did! But you would be a fool to follow in there exact foot steps and drop it in a car. It may last a little wile, but it wouldn't make 60 trips down the 1/8th let alone the 1/4.
Old 07-19-2011, 08:26 AM
  #28  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Spoolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Here and sometimes there too.
Posts: 13,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There's a link to the article in this thread...

http://www.performancetrucks.net/for...-going-485734/
Old 07-19-2011, 06:46 PM
  #29  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
xXxSilveradoxXx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Willows, California
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by flippincamaro
we currently have 2 6.0 engines stock internals, One in a mustang running 14#s an a 100 shot, Mine in my full size chevy truck obs, running 12#s as of right now till we get the ice chest filled an tires, we are turning it up slowly to 20#s very great engines for boost oh an we are using the ebay gt45 88 wannabe turbo no problems with em an one is 4 years old
Got anymore info on those setups or numbers? I've got a stock rotating group LQ4 with a Turbonetics 76mm that I'm putting in my 2002 Silverado.
Old 07-19-2011, 09:43 PM
  #30  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Big bird55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dayton texas
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

my magazine says it was a 5.3 truck block?????
Old 07-19-2011, 09:44 PM
  #31  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Big bird55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dayton texas
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

just like in the link the second paragraph states its a 5.3
Old 07-19-2011, 09:56 PM
  #32  
Old School Heavy
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 63 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Big bird55
my magazine says it was a 5.3 truck block?????
Originally Posted by Big bird55
just like in the link the second paragraph states its a 5.3
Read page 80(the last page of the article). On that page you will see that they removed the oil pan and found out after the test that the motor was actually a 4.8.
Old 07-20-2011, 12:20 AM
  #33  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Big bird55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dayton texas
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

ohhhhhh thankss i quit after i saw the last hp numbers
Old 07-20-2011, 03:47 AM
  #34  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
firebird99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Damn thats sick let me see a ford do that!!!!! Without forged internals
Old 07-20-2011, 07:45 AM
  #35  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
nastychevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: troy, IL
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default




Heres the skinny:

The goal of the test was to test the true limits of the LM7, which is the 5.3L truck engine based on the LSx series engines. Pretty much an LS1 with an iron block in a nutshell.

They picked up what they thought was an 5.3L LM7 but, as they found out after the testing was over, it was actually a 4.8L LR4 which is the smallest of the LSx based iron truck engines. One phenomenal part about the engine was the #8 cylinder had a large rust spot etched in it that their hone wouldn't remove....they left it there.

For the top end they upgraded to 2" intake valves, stock exhaust valves and did a very mild port job on the heads. Flow numbers went from 220/220 to 300/220 cfm on the intake and exhaust respectively. ARP studs with Fel-Pro MLS gaskets kept the heads down. A mild Comp Cams cam was installed along with the supplied lifters, pushrods, springs and rockers remained stock. A FAST LSXR intake was installed as well with a big TB.

The short block(except the cam) was all stock. Even the original bearings and rings that were on the motor when it was purchased were reused. They even sanded the rust off the #8 rings and reused them!

Fueling was handled by 75 lbs/hr injectors and upgraded fuel rails. It was run on Rockett 118.

The two turbochargers were CXracing 76mm units run off of flipped shorty truck headers(no name brand headers).

The engine was run for SIXTY dyno pulls over half of which were claimed to be at 1000+ hp. In it's final trim, in between 26 and 27psi, the engine produced just over 1200hp. What stopped the testing was not engine failure but an ignition failure(all sensors and electrical components like the ignition were stock). The engine was 100% a-ok by the end of the testing.
Old 07-20-2011, 07:10 PM
  #36  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
xXxSilveradoxXx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Willows, California
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Big bird55
my magazine says it was a 5.3 truck block?????
The LM7 (5.3) and LR4 (4.8) share the same block. I believe that on the front, where it has the displacement cast, it says "4.8/5.3".

Originally Posted by nastychevelle
The goal of the test was to test the true limits of the LM7, which is the 5.3L truck engine based on the LSx series engines. Pretty much an LS1 with an iron block in a nutshell.
Old 07-20-2011, 08:07 PM
  #37  
On The Tree
 
1LOMARO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sounds like a good replacement for my little v6.... might even save a few bucks along the way.



Quick Reply: 1100+ HP Stock 4.8 short block in new HotRod



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.