Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

Nissan GT-R vs. Hennesey Cadillac Escalade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2011 | 10:31 PM
  #1  
CoastieWS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Lake Charles La / Mobile, AL
Default Nissan GT-R vs. Hennesey Cadillac Escalade

Talking about getting your groceries in a hurry LOL

http://youtu.be/NXpV8_LXrCM
Old 11-27-2011 | 12:38 AM
  #2  
Mr.z/28's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles CA
Default

Holy Chet! Nice kill.
Old 11-27-2011 | 12:50 AM
  #3  
chadroosa's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: urbana ohio
Default

i want one!!!
Old 11-27-2011 | 01:00 AM
  #4  
crazboy99's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Powder Springs, GA
Default

That is a fast Escalade, but I'm not really impressed. It is only marginally faster than the GTR. 1000 hp would be better suited to something lighter...
Old 11-27-2011 | 01:05 AM
  #5  
btownws6's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: tarpon springs, FL
Default

daaaaaaaaaamn
Old 11-27-2011 | 02:26 AM
  #6  
02sleeperz28's Avatar
9 Second Club

iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: homeless
Default

Nice truck!
Old 11-27-2011 | 02:37 AM
  #7  
vetteboy99's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, tn
Default

Damn! I have a 08 Denali as the family car! 6.0 AWD Hauls ***!!
Old 11-27-2011 | 04:29 PM
  #8  
71novaguy's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 1
Default

good kill, but the denali still launched early
Old 11-27-2011 | 04:47 PM
  #9  
99FormulaM6's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default

Originally Posted by crazboy99
That is a fast Escalade, but I'm not really impressed. It is only marginally faster than the GTR. 1000 hp would be better suited to something lighter...
Not impressed? Of course the motor would be better suited in a lighter car, but not everyone wants to drive around in a gutted Fbody or a Civic with no interior and only a driver seat.
Old 11-27-2011 | 05:17 PM
  #10  
WSsick's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 3
From: St. Peters, MO
Default

Pretty cool. Love the stock exhaust tip.


My cousin's husband had something to that effect, 434ci LSX with twin 67s. Never got to see it in action, but apparently it was quite the sleeper.
Old 11-27-2011 | 10:00 PM
  #11  
crazboy99's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Powder Springs, GA
Default

Originally Posted by 99FormulaM6
Not impressed? Of course the motor would be better suited in a lighter car, but not everyone wants to drive around in a gutted Fbody or a Civic with no interior and only a driver seat.
Where did I say it would be better in a Camaro or Civic that is gutted?
Old 11-27-2011 | 10:16 PM
  #12  
egott_91's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
From: P-Town, IN
Default

I think my stepdad needs to do this to our Escalade. Lol
Old 11-27-2011 | 10:26 PM
  #13  
Morbid's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
Default

That's a pretty big middle finger to the tree huggers, I like it!
Old 11-28-2011 | 06:21 AM
  #14  
BOBS99SS's Avatar
Captain Double Post
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 2
From: Elyria Ohio
Default

i dont know how someone can say there not impressed, thats pretty crazy if you ask me
Old 11-28-2011 | 09:41 AM
  #15  
TheSilverOne's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 5
From: Taxachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by crazboy99
That is a fast Escalade, but I'm not really impressed. It is only marginally faster than the GTR. 1000 hp would be better suited to something lighter...
No one here is impressed with your car either
Old 11-28-2011 | 09:52 AM
  #16  
Camaro_94's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Default

That truck only weighs 6k lbs? Bad *** truck though. I thought they weighed more.
Old 11-28-2011 | 12:04 PM
  #17  
Tainted's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Default

cool, but I still dont understand why....
Old 11-28-2011 | 12:46 PM
  #18  
crazboy99's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Powder Springs, GA
Default

So everyone has to have the same opinion? I don't care if you are unimpressed by my car... that is why it is my car and not yours.

Straight from Hennessey Performance.
# Performance:
# • 0 - 60 mph: 3.3 sec.
# • 11.3 sec. @ 124 mph

Performance figures are based on the 2011 Cadillac Escalade running on 93 octane fuel. Other truck and SUV performance numbers may vary due to the size and weight of the vehicle.

11.3 out of a 427 twin turbo'd LSX. Yes, getting a 6000+ lb suv that fast is no easy task. But, to buy a 67-85K vehicle, then adding the price of the HPE conversion on top of that to take it up to 1000hp (761awhp) only to BARELY outrun a STOCK GT-R, is unimpressive to me. Kind of sounds like some older threads about Supra with 800hp cars running 12's.

Last edited by crazboy99; 11-28-2011 at 01:26 PM.
Old 11-28-2011 | 06:02 PM
  #19  
jlcustomz's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 609
Likes: 6
From: jacksonville,fl
Default

To each their own, not everybody can understand why ,when others of us say why not. Driving heavy worktrucks for a living,I understand how cool it can be to beat cars. Wouldn,t mind that engine in my 170" wb Mercedes sprinter dually turbo diesel.It may [only] run low12's with my tools & inventory onboard, But that's plenty enough to make most any fast car owner say what just happened here?
Old 11-28-2011 | 08:35 PM
  #20  
Morbid's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 1
From: The Colony, TX
Default

Originally Posted by crazboy99
So everyone has to have the same opinion? I don't care if you are unimpressed by my car... that is why it is my car and not yours.

Straight from Hennessey Performance.
# Performance:
# • 0 - 60 mph: 3.3 sec.
# • 11.3 sec. @ 124 mph

Performance figures are based on the 2011 Cadillac Escalade running on 93 octane fuel. Other truck and SUV performance numbers may vary due to the size and weight of the vehicle.

11.3 out of a 427 twin turbo'd LSX. Yes, getting a 6000+ lb suv that fast is no easy task. But, to buy a 67-85K vehicle, then adding the price of the HPE conversion on top of that to take it up to 1000hp (761awhp) only to BARELY outrun a STOCK GT-R, is unimpressive to me. Kind of sounds like some older threads about Supra with 800hp cars running 12's.
For whom the thread trolls.


Quick Reply: Nissan GT-R vs. Hennesey Cadillac Escalade



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 PM.