2002 Camaro vs 2003 C5 very
#1
2002 Camaro vs 2003 C5 very
#6
Originally Posted by OneMeanZ
I think the Vette was just honking and gettign some footage of the SS getting on it, because no way in hell a stock SS would do that, and you can't even hear the Vette get on it
not good lighting but you get the idea:
#7
Originally Posted by stoleit
The Vette was ***** out . The SS was 100% stock save for a K&N filter. This is why I kinda dont like street fire, they just paste over the first part of the video with their intro and then black, you missed the details that MY vette is A4 and MY SS is M6. You missed the StoleIt vs StoleIt intro as well.
not good lighting but you get the idea:
not good lighting but you get the idea:
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by stoleit
hmm...not sure. What does a stock A4 normally come with? I'd imagine 3.15's, 2.73's are really long for that car. You also have to relize my SS is factory freak. 330rwhp/345rwtq.
#10
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Grove City Ohio/Port Washington L.I sometimes
Ya right.I don't believe it.Stock SS's don't outrun stock C5's.I own one of each and granted my Z is different that a regular C5 I still don't believe it.
The C5 couldn't have been on the gas to get left like that.Total BS
The C5 couldn't have been on the gas to get left like that.Total BS
#11
I don't see why he would lie about one of his cars being faster than another one of his own cars. m6 with good driving and 330rwhp and 345 rwtq vs. a4 possibly with 2.73s is believable. Especially if you started from a low second gear in the vette in which case it bogs like it's pulling a trailor until about 4500 rpm
#14
Yeah when my 2002 SS had a cam, headers and full exhaust I raced my friends A4 97 C5 that only would trap 102-103 mph and I didnt walk him that bad. My car was putting down 375 rwhp with a samll cam. Granted I pulled him pretty bad but not 3-4 cars within 2 seconds.
#15
Originally Posted by 02 Camaro SS
I don't see why he would lie about one of his cars being faster than another one of his own cars. m6 with good driving and 330rwhp and 345 rwtq vs. a4 possibly with 2.73s is believable. Especially if you started from a low second gear in the vette in which case it bogs like it's pulling a trailor until about 4500 rpm
Originally Posted by Roofer Dave
The SS pulls away from the C5 in that video like a 11 second car pulling away from a stocker.A stock SS instantly pulls 3-4 cars on a C5,okie dokie.
And my SS has never lost to a vette yet. I've raced 3 or 4 targa, vert, and frc's (no z06's) and I haven't lost yet. I've got another video on my computer where some other guy is out in his dad's vette and hes ***** out and I CATCH up to him then proceed to granny shift and still pull ahead.
#16
Hes not lying I have seen the car and I know that it is quickI dynoed 350/350 on old setup and and didnt leave him by much while my car is lughter than his...SO NO HE IS NOT BULLSHITTING WHATSOEVER sorry vettes lose to fbodies sometimes it happens even when they are stock. it doesnt take much to pass em with a m6 vs a4
#18
******* typical "THE CORVETTE CAN NEVER BE BEAT BY A LESSER CAMARO! NEVAR!" You guys are forgeting, this is street racing where anything and everything happens. c5's arent god compaired to f-bods
#19
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Grove City Ohio/Port Washington L.I sometimes
Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
******* typical "THE CORVETTE CAN NEVER BE BEAT BY A LESSER CAMARO! NEVAR!" You guys are forgeting, this is street racing where anything and everything happens. c5's arent god compaired to f-bods
My Z06 dynoed 7 more rwhp than the SS in that video.I would tear that *** up easily in a race,street or track.I've never driven a auto C5 so that's the only thing I can compare it to from personal experience.
I own one of each so there is no C5 bias here.My SS would've gotten stomped by my Z stock to stock.
#20
Originally Posted by Roofer Dave
All I'm going to say is lighter car,more horsepower should win.Comparing the slowest C5 to a 6 sp 02 SS isn't a good comparison.
My Z06 dynoed 7 more rwhp than the SS in that video.I would tear that *** up easily in a race,street or track.I've never driven a auto C5 so that's the only thing I can compare it to from personal experience.
I own one of each so there is no C5 bias here.My SS would've gotten stomped by my Z stock to stock.
My Z06 dynoed 7 more rwhp than the SS in that video.I would tear that *** up easily in a race,street or track.I've never driven a auto C5 so that's the only thing I can compare it to from personal experience.
I own one of each so there is no C5 bias here.My SS would've gotten stomped by my Z stock to stock.
your z06 only dynoed 337 rwhp? isn't that incredibly low for a z? i thought most are in the 350's...where do you live? anywhere near chicago? Id like to try out a z and see how much i lose by.