*STOCK* LS1 Dyno Numbers POST! (Do A Search)
02-22-2010, 02:51 PM
#41
TECH Enthusiast
This is my car and from what Ive been told its a perfect example of what a stock A4 02 SS should do. Keep in mind the only slp options on my car was the 35th anniversary package. Its rated at 325hp340/trq at the crank from the factory.
Mustang Dyno:
308whp Locked Converter/3rd gear (Torque number was useless due to converter spike, did like 384wtrq)
13.5 @ 104 bone stock down the paper filter
13.3 @ 105.5 k&n, free ram air, ported maf
13.1 @ 105.7 k&n free ram air, ported maf, ngk tr5 @ .40, gmpp 6.0 wires
Ive seen one stock c5 z06 put down 363whp completely bone stock. So it sounds like to me either he has REALLY happy dyno, or he has a Ls6.
Mustang Dyno:
308whp Locked Converter/3rd gear (Torque number was useless due to converter spike, did like 384wtrq)
13.5 @ 104 bone stock down the paper filter
13.3 @ 105.5 k&n, free ram air, ported maf
13.1 @ 105.7 k&n free ram air, ported maf, ngk tr5 @ .40, gmpp 6.0 wires
Ive seen one stock c5 z06 put down 363whp completely bone stock. So it sounds like to me either he has REALLY happy dyno, or he has a Ls6.
02-22-2010, 04:11 PM
#43
Mustang Dyno:
308whp Locked Converter/3rd gear (Torque number was useless due to converter spike, did like 384wtrq)
13.5 @ 104 bone stock down the paper filter
13.3 @ 105.5 k&n, free ram air, ported maf
13.1 @ 105.7 k&n free ram air, ported maf, ngk tr5 @ .40, gmpp 6.0 wire
308whp Locked Converter/3rd gear (Torque number was useless due to converter spike, did like 384wtrq)
13.5 @ 104 bone stock down the paper filter
13.3 @ 105.5 k&n, free ram air, ported maf
13.1 @ 105.7 k&n free ram air, ported maf, ngk tr5 @ .40, gmpp 6.0 wire
02-22-2010, 04:18 PM
#44
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: lexington, SC
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its not to the crank its to the wheels but im taking it to a local race shop that also has a mustang dyno and they will be able to give me a print out of everything and i will post it up here whenever i can and the stamp number on the heads are 241 which are the stock heads for the car.
02-23-2010, 02:51 PM
#45
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shillington PA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what's your rpm at 70 mph? If the gears are not stock, and they don't input the correct rear gear ratio on the dyno, it will dyno incorrectly. If those numbers are indeed correct, you may have a cheatr cam, or something of the like. Just a cam that runs well, but sounds stock.
and the plot thickins... 
02-24-2010, 09:21 PM
#48
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shillington PA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
auto or manual? 340 seems like a converter spike.
And OP, by no means do I disbelieve that a dyno gave you those numbers, nor do I disbelieve that you believe your car to be stock. It sounds like you have no reason to lie, I'm just trying to get to the root of the numbers, because if the dyno is accurate, its not stock, and if its stock, the dyno isn't accurate.
And OP, by no means do I disbelieve that a dyno gave you those numbers, nor do I disbelieve that you believe your car to be stock. It sounds like you have no reason to lie, I'm just trying to get to the root of the numbers, because if the dyno is accurate, its not stock, and if its stock, the dyno isn't accurate.
02-24-2010, 09:31 PM
#49
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
auto or manual? 340 seems like a converter spike.
And OP, by no means do I disbelieve that a dyno gave you those numbers, nor do I disbelieve that you believe your car to be stock. It sounds like you have no reason to lie, I'm just trying to get to the root of the numbers, because if the dyno is accurate, its not stock, and if its stock, the dyno isn't accurate.
And OP, by no means do I disbelieve that a dyno gave you those numbers, nor do I disbelieve that you believe your car to be stock. It sounds like you have no reason to lie, I'm just trying to get to the root of the numbers, because if the dyno is accurate, its not stock, and if its stock, the dyno isn't accurate.
runs
60' - 2.027
1/8 - 8.484 @ 85
1/4 - 13.005 @ 107
9yrs later all i've gotten for the car is air lid k&n filter
Last edited by domestiks; 02-24-2010 at 09:32 PM. Reason: adding something
02-24-2010, 09:58 PM
#50
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,361
Likes: 0
Received 1,793 Likes
on
1,277 Posts
If so, that's a strong car with great numbers.
02-24-2010, 10:07 PM
#51
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: lexington, SC
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
had the car redynod on the lowest reading dyno in town and it put 310 hp and 326 tq on there dyno on a very humid day.
Now the guy that origianally dynoed my car recalibrated it and it dynod 346 hp and 348 tq i don't know which one to believer because they are both dyno jets and the same car has put down lower numbers going from the lowest reading dyno in town to the guy who originally dynod my car this is rediculious i say screw them all and put a big nasty cam in it with full exhaust and heads and maybe some gas then start worrying about numbers being accurate
Now the guy that origianally dynoed my car recalibrated it and it dynod 346 hp and 348 tq i don't know which one to believer because they are both dyno jets and the same car has put down lower numbers going from the lowest reading dyno in town to the guy who originally dynod my car this is rediculious i say screw them all and put a big nasty cam in it with full exhaust and heads and maybe some gas then start worrying about numbers being accurate
02-25-2010, 08:22 AM
#54
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shillington PA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
track results never lie had the car redynod on the lowest reading dyno in town and it put 310 hp and 326 tq on there dyno on a very humid day.
Now the guy that origianally dynoed my car recalibrated it and it dynod 346 hp and 348 tq i don't know which one to believer because they are both dyno jets and the same car has put down lower numbers going from the lowest reading dyno in town to the guy who originally dynod my car this is rediculious i say screw them all and put a big nasty cam in it with full exhaust and heads and maybe some gas then start worrying about numbers being accurate
Now the guy that origianally dynoed my car recalibrated it and it dynod 346 hp and 348 tq i don't know which one to believer because they are both dyno jets and the same car has put down lower numbers going from the lowest reading dyno in town to the guy who originally dynod my car this is rediculious i say screw them all and put a big nasty cam in it with full exhaust and heads and maybe some gas then start worrying about numbers being accurate
This
02-25-2010, 04:26 PM
#55
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: lexington, SC
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah im thinking my car falls in between those numbers somewhere oh well at the end of the day she is still all stock its not like i wasted an *** of money and aren't putting down the numbers i want to
03-09-2010, 03:28 PM
#57
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OP, do you have 241 heads or 243 heads? (stamped on the corner of the head above the exhaust manifold, front pass. side head)
If they are 243, it is extremely likely it's either an LS6 pull out from the scrap yard, or some one has been in the motor, agreed? A stock, tuned LS6 would be about there. Even a stealth cammed LS1 would make those numbers..
Video of idle?
If they are 243, it is extremely likely it's either an LS6 pull out from the scrap yard, or some one has been in the motor, agreed? A stock, tuned LS6 would be about there. Even a stealth cammed LS1 would make those numbers..
Video of idle?
03-09-2010, 03:37 PM
#58
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On a car lot, shopping...
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all i know is im the second owner of the car i put it on a mustang dyno which reads lower than any other dyno now maybe yall are right and there is stuff done to the car i don't know about and maybe his dyno is reading wrong all i know is it dynoed 363 and 365 twice in a row but im going to another dyno just to make sure of whats its really putting down.
had the car redynod on the lowest reading dyno in town and it put 310 hp and 326 tq on there dyno on a very humid day.
Now the guy that origianally dynoed my car recalibrated it and it dynod 346 hp and 348 tq i don't know which one to believer because they are both dyno jets and the same car has put down lower numbers going from the lowest reading dyno in town to the guy who originally dynod my car this is rediculious i say screw them all and put a big nasty cam in it with full exhaust and heads and maybe some gas then start worrying about numbers being accurate
Now the guy that origianally dynoed my car recalibrated it and it dynod 346 hp and 348 tq i don't know which one to believer because they are both dyno jets and the same car has put down lower numbers going from the lowest reading dyno in town to the guy who originally dynod my car this is rediculious i say screw them all and put a big nasty cam in it with full exhaust and heads and maybe some gas then start worrying about numbers being accurate
