99 camaro ss feeling slow
06-28-2010, 04:47 PM
#21
TECH Regular
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ricerville
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is often the result of K&N-type filter use. People over-oil them, and this is what happens over time. I'd rather just stick with paper for any applications that use an MAF. And if you absolutely insist on getting that 0.5 hp gain from the K&N, then make sure to check/clean the MAF on a somewhat regular basis (at least with every plug change).
06-28-2010, 05:37 PM
#22
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central jersey, nj
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oil additives are crap for the most part. Steer clear IMO. The only possibile exception would be something like ZDDP for the old flat tappet cammed engines, since most modern oils seem to be reducing zinc content. Even still, I'd rather just stick to a specialty oil like VR-1 that has the proper base structure for old engine applications.
This is often the result of K&N-type filter use. People over-oil them, and this is what happens over time. I'd rather just stick with paper for any applications that use an MAF. And if you absolutely insist on getting that 0.5 hp gain from the K&N, then make sure to check/clean the MAF on a somewhat regular basis (at least with every plug change).
This is often the result of K&N-type filter use. People over-oil them, and this is what happens over time. I'd rather just stick with paper for any applications that use an MAF. And if you absolutely insist on getting that 0.5 hp gain from the K&N, then make sure to check/clean the MAF on a somewhat regular basis (at least with every plug change).
06-28-2010, 06:48 PM
#24
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,258
Likes: 0
Received 1,692 Likes
on
1,213 Posts
06-28-2010, 09:36 PM
#25
Launching!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if this is true i will start doing it on every fill up, anyone else heard of this?!
06-28-2010, 10:54 PM
#26
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,258
Likes: 0
Received 1,692 Likes
on
1,213 Posts
Raising octane without a need for it will only cause a decrease in performance and MPG. If you aren't getting detonation (and don't see KR on a scanner), and aren't boosted/spraying, then stay away from anything more than premium.
06-29-2010, 01:19 AM
#27
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Poinciana, Florida
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I Guess That's Just How I Type... Not Sure Why I Do It... xD
at least down here
06-29-2010, 08:58 AM
#29
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
edit- mileage is not as good, 2-3 mpg less
Last edited by thatguy383; 06-29-2010 at 09:07 AM.
07-02-2010, 08:54 PM
#30
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central jersey, nj
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
update...
went to etown tonight and ran a best of 13.8 at 104. so just cleaning that sensor netted me 1.3 sec and 8 mph. The banging was really bad launching cause the drag strip was pretty well prepped. So i'm sure i'm still hurting from that, other wise i'd say the car is in alright shape. Still need to get the y pipe fixed, the shop said they would do it next thursday.
went to etown tonight and ran a best of 13.8 at 104. so just cleaning that sensor netted me 1.3 sec and 8 mph. The banging was really bad launching cause the drag strip was pretty well prepped. So i'm sure i'm still hurting from that, other wise i'd say the car is in alright shape. Still need to get the y pipe fixed, the shop said they would do it next thursday.
07-03-2010, 01:19 AM
#31
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,258
Likes: 0
Received 1,692 Likes
on
1,213 Posts
Definitely a huge step in the right direction! 
Your trap speeds are still a little slow for a LT header/ORY M6 car. Should be more like ~108ish. I would not worry about that until you fix the Y-pipe though, as KR could certainly be causing a reduction in power. Might also benefit from a custom tune for the exhaust to get the most out of it.
Your trap speeds are still a little slow for a LT header/ORY M6 car. Should be more like ~108ish. I would not worry about that until you fix the Y-pipe though, as KR could certainly be causing a reduction in power. Might also benefit from a custom tune for the exhaust to get the most out of it.
07-03-2010, 06:04 AM
#32
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central jersey, nj
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitely a huge step in the right direction!
Your trap speeds are still a little slow for a LT header/ORY M6 car. Should be more like ~108ish. I would not worry about that until you fix the Y-pipe though, as KR could certainly be causing a reduction in power. Might also benefit from a custom tune for the exhaust to get the most out of it.
Your trap speeds are still a little slow for a LT header/ORY M6 car. Should be more like ~108ish. I would not worry about that until you fix the Y-pipe though, as KR could certainly be causing a reduction in power. Might also benefit from a custom tune for the exhaust to get the most out of it.
