1998 Camaro Z28 fuel tank size?
#1
1998 Camaro Z28 fuel tank size?
I've searched and searched and came across two numbers mainly; 15.5 and 15.8. It doesn't really matter one way or the other as the fuel mileage numbers only change by a handful of numbers (less than one gallon), but it's something nice to know I guess.
If I indeed have a 15.5 gallon tank, my MPG is 27.09. With a 15.8 it's 26.58. And technically it wasn't in need of a refuel at the time of doing so but it was close enough, so maybe 28-28.5MPG.
If I indeed have a 15.5 gallon tank, my MPG is 27.09. With a 15.8 it's 26.58. And technically it wasn't in need of a refuel at the time of doing so but it was close enough, so maybe 28-28.5MPG.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 1,836
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Fill the tank until the pump shuts off. Then drive until the tank is down to 1/3 or 1/4 or 1/8 left on the gauge. Then refill the tank until the pump shuts off again. Divide the mileage driven during that period by the amount of gallons pumped at the final fill-up. This is your MPG, as explained above.
#9
And how much gas would be left with only an 1/8th remaining? I'm positive I said I did just that. Again, I use the majority of my tank, then calculate my mileage, all without running out or drying the pump up.
And what if your first 320 miles were all highway (absolutely no playing around), while the last 120 were back road/city driving with a few WOT pulls? Wouldn't my numbers be considerably skewed after driving the first 50 miles before refueling?
And what if your first 320 miles were all highway (absolutely no playing around), while the last 120 were back road/city driving with a few WOT pulls? Wouldn't my numbers be considerably skewed after driving the first 50 miles before refueling?
Last edited by LS WON A4; 07-09-2012 at 11:33 PM.
#10
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 1,836
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
For the purpose of calculating MPG, it doesn't matter. The only numbers that matter are the amount of miles driven since the last FULL fill-up, and the amount of gallons pumped into the tank at the very next FULL refueling.
You would actually have to run the tank dry in order to correctly divide the total miles driven by the total tank capacity. If any fuel is left in the tank, then this method isn't accurate.
Then the MPG figure in question would be a "mixed driving" figure. If you want true city MPG and true highway MPG, then you will have to drive the car in such respective ways exclusively during separate tanks of fuel.
#11
You would actually have to run the tank dry in order to correctly divide the total miles driven by the total tank capacity. If any fuel is left in the tank, then this method isn't accurate.
Then the MPG figure in question would be a "mixed driving" figure. If you want true city MPG and true highway MPG, then you will have to drive the car in such respective ways exclusively during separate tanks of fuel.
Then the MPG figure in question would be a "mixed driving" figure. If you want true city MPG and true highway MPG, then you will have to drive the car in such respective ways exclusively during separate tanks of fuel.
Therefor driving 50 miles won't accurately depict my fuel mileage. But thanks for the answer, and helping me all the other times you have. I truly appreciate it.
#12
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 1,836
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Fuel tank size means absolutely nothing, doesn't help AT ALL for MPG calculations, and is meaningless for this purpose. That's just all there is too it. I can tell you the MPG of any car in the world with my only knowledge being the amount of miles driven since the last FULL fill-up, and the amount of gallons added at the very next FULL fill-up. Doesn't matter what the tank size is.
Still not sure where this 50 miles thing is coming from.
I've tried my best to help, and explain in-depth. You don't use tank capacity to calculate MPG, period. It doesn't matter how much gas is left in the tank. If you fill up the tank, then drive 200 miles, then fill it up again, and it takes 10 gallons, then you attained 20mpg. 200/10. It's really just that simple. Nowhere in that equation does total tank capacity matter. Not sure why this has become so difficult to explain.