1/8 times at the TRACK
12-05-2007, 01:47 AM
#22
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...im sorry but thats kinda hard to believe..a good driver with full bolt ons could only pull a 8.5 at the track..i doubt you pulled a 8.7 completely stock... 
...nevermind ,i stand corrected...
12-05-2007, 09:04 AM
#25
11 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
uve got a point about the altitude, didnt put that into consideration, as well as temp/humidity, and track conditions....the auto though really shouldnt make that much of a difference though. maybe a .1 to .2 at most.
12-05-2007, 09:09 AM
#26
11 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no sir...03 mustang gt 4.6 2v. my other buddy with a 99 mustang gt ran almost the same times. he put on DRs and ran an 8.5 consistent. when i added gears i actually ran worse because of traction issues. i understand how u think its farfetched because most mustang owners CANT DRIVE!!!! but anything less than that (unless driven by John Force...lol) doesnt seem right.
of course then i saw an exhaust/intake ss camaro run low 8s and it kinda busted my spirits.
of course then i saw an exhaust/intake ss camaro run low 8s and it kinda busted my spirits.
12-05-2007, 02:59 PM
#27
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no sir...03 mustang gt 4.6 2v. my other buddy with a 99 mustang gt ran almost the same times. he put on DRs and ran an 8.5 consistent. when i added gears i actually ran worse because of traction issues. i understand how u think its farfetched because most mustang owners CANT DRIVE!!!! but anything less than that (unless driven by John Force...lol) doesnt seem right.
of course then i saw an exhaust/intake ss camaro run low 8s and it kinda busted my spirits.
of course then i saw an exhaust/intake ss camaro run low 8s and it kinda busted my spirits.
12-05-2007, 05:26 PM
#29
11 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no it had a catback, air filter, and DRs (245 nittos).....not stock but sure aint gonna add much, i mean it is a 2v 4.6. wel all seemed to keep out 60s at 1.9-2.0 my other buddy in his catback and air intake GT auto ran a consistent 8.99-9.0 all night long. im not tryin to make mustangs faster than they are, im simply sayin that it is possible and an ls1 with the good driver mod should make low 8s. im not bashing you for not runnin a low 8 either.
12-05-2007, 09:32 PM
#30
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BONE STOCK boys an a4 or stick ls1 will do 8.8 - 9.2 and up! Track conditions and driver are always a factor. Everyone forgets to mention tires, bolt on's lids..etc.. Only a small percentage of these cars out there are bone stock right now.
12-05-2007, 11:05 PM
#32
TECH Fanatic
was that 12.6 with the dr's, because I have an 01 A4 with just a lid and cutout run a 12.9 on kdws, and you have a full bolt on 02 a4 with a stall running a 12.6...is something wrong with yopur car is my car some sort of factory freak.
12-06-2007, 09:29 AM
#34
11 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-07-2007, 08:16 PM
#39
b03Mustang... I beg to differ about mustang drivers being bad..I used to think that about Camaro drivers until I got on here. You sound like a good driver and of course your sea level track is going to yield better times. As for the guy running 9.1, get sticky tires and prolly the driver mod