"NEW ORLEANS greasy talk part 2" da remix
07-21-2009, 12:48 PM
#125
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: louisiana
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i aint gon lie dat **** was fun..u gave me my best run ... but when i came on tires i was gonna have to give u the buissness lol...i wish i was still stock itwas more interesting and had more races....
07-21-2009, 03:01 PM
#127
Restricted User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not many C6Zs built by others put down more than 550-580rwhp, and MOST of the rest are full of ****, ALL the 427 hyd. roller, stockish intake, N/A ls7's put down LESS than 600rwhp, ANYONE who says they made more is a cork-sucking LIAR
It is common to see 525-580 rwhp depending on the cam profile and mods, and the cam in that car has 231deg duration, and was originally spec'ed out by Geoff and Patrick G for Z about 3 years ago. Drives stock above 1100rpm, so w/ that baby cam, his #s are not too far off. This guy is bullshitting about the lingingfelter package......heads maybe, but that is a "family" cam. The cam I spec'd for the LS7 won the 8-cam shoot-out by 12rwhp and 10ftlbs over ALL other competitors, and it was just shy of 600rwhp. Say what u want, but 600 to the tire is a big # for n/a and hyd. rollers that appear stock under the hood. And let's not forget the dyno # is very relative, and 600 will put a 6sp. Z into the 9s w/ the right clutch and driver, it's been done a few times now
It is common to see 525-580 rwhp depending on the cam profile and mods, and the cam in that car has 231deg duration, and was originally spec'ed out by Geoff and Patrick G for Z about 3 years ago. Drives stock above 1100rpm, so w/ that baby cam, his #s are not too far off. This guy is bullshitting about the lingingfelter package......heads maybe, but that is a "family" cam. The cam I spec'd for the LS7 won the 8-cam shoot-out by 12rwhp and 10ftlbs over ALL other competitors, and it was just shy of 600rwhp. Say what u want, but 600 to the tire is a big # for n/a and hyd. rollers that appear stock under the hood. And let's not forget the dyno # is very relative, and 600 will put a 6sp. Z into the 9s w/ the right clutch and driver, it's been done a few times now
And one of the things that makes me think he changed cams is that he said the car sucked under 2300 rpm's.. but maybe he was bullshitting that part
07-21-2009, 04:08 PM
#128
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand everything you said which is why I said what I said. There are cam bolt on C6Z's making 540 to 550 with not so large cams so there is no reason that heads cam fast intake shouldn't be at 600
And one of the things that makes me think he changed cams is that he said the car sucked under 2300 rpm's.. but maybe he was bullshitting that part
And one of the things that makes me think he changed cams is that he said the car sucked under 2300 rpm's.. but maybe he was bullshitting that part
.....that would be a first and it would be posted in bold letters all over the forums
. 
That's a hell of a rwhp gain, but I've heard that Thunder Racing stickers are good for an additional 50 rwhp.
07-21-2009, 06:49 PM
#130
On The Tree
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-21-2009, 10:35 PM
#134
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: louisiana
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-21-2009, 10:42 PM
#135
On The Tree
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-22-2009, 12:00 AM
#136
Last edited by big bro intimidator; 07-22-2009 at 12:22 AM.
07-22-2009, 12:17 AM
#137
.LISTEN I THINK I JUST HEARD A CAM ONLY CAR.........NAHHHHH JUST CAM/HEAD CARS.LMAO
07-22-2009, 03:07 AM
#138
Restricted User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-22-2009, 08:24 AM
#139
On The Tree
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
:p ics::bar f:SAY BRUH WHY IS YALL KICKIN THAT CAM ONLY **** I NO U GOT THOSE HEADS WORKED ON THAT SLOW *** CAR AND THAT,S NOT THE POINT I WON,T A RACE I FUCKED YALL UP THE FIRST TIME AND YALL BEN RUNNIN.DERE HE IIIIIIS
07-22-2009, 08:54 AM
#140
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Westbank of N.O.
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tell ya'll what, we can strap a stock Z to the dyno and U tell me what u want it to read and I will make it happen. Provide u w/ a dyno graph that looks real too! As I said, dyno's vary a bit, and then there is the correction factor, temp sensor location, and so on. AND, I see dyno comparisons all the time w/ the favorable pull made at like 7am and the lower # pull made in the evening. Yeah, I know, correction factor my ***
Cheating the dyno is easier than cheating on taco bell with mcdonalds. The 58o rwhp link is for real, the 605.......well let's just say that's the most I would ever believe w/o a "real" intake. And how do we verify compression and fuel used? BIG dyno #s SELL volumes of parts and pakages, and that's fine as long as the results posted are honest. I could have posted up 600rwhp when I made 589 w/ the ls7 3 years ago, by the time we made that pull, everyone but Geoff and I had left the shop. Who would have been the wiser? BTW, that 589hp had 554ftlbs to go with it
Cheating the dyno is easier than cheating on taco bell with mcdonalds. The 58o rwhp link is for real, the 605.......well let's just say that's the most I would ever believe w/o a "real" intake. And how do we verify compression and fuel used? BIG dyno #s SELL volumes of parts and pakages, and that's fine as long as the results posted are honest. I could have posted up 600rwhp when I made 589 w/ the ls7 3 years ago, by the time we made that pull, everyone but Geoff and I had left the shop. Who would have been the wiser? BTW, that 589hp had 554ftlbs to go with it