Introducing Fiber-Tuned Intake Manifolds
10-28-2008, 09:14 AM
#21
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/1009253-new-intake-manafold-fi-guys.html#post10374004
guess i'll keep the two together so that both can be updated
how could the FI crowd be forgotten
guess i'll keep the two together so that both can be updated
how could the FI crowd be forgotten
10-28-2008, 09:54 AM
#22
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: deam land
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks like a director port nitrous would work great with this intake but I would really be uncomfortable using a plate or fogger due to the raised runners. Looks like a good way to puddle fuel.
10-28-2008, 10:33 AM
#23
Sorry guys.. Things were hectic yesterday and I made this post quickly..
I just updated my post with release dates and pricing..
This intake is priced right in the middle when compared to the Fast and other sheet metal intakes. We fill that for the guys just looking for the performance a fast can provide may find it a value to spend alittle more and get an intake that will not explode under the event of a backfire. It will also be a great value when needing the added performance of a larger flowing intake when compared to other sheet metal intakes that price in the upper range of 3000 dollars.
Dave
I just updated my post with release dates and pricing..
This intake is priced right in the middle when compared to the Fast and other sheet metal intakes. We fill that for the guys just looking for the performance a fast can provide may find it a value to spend alittle more and get an intake that will not explode under the event of a backfire. It will also be a great value when needing the added performance of a larger flowing intake when compared to other sheet metal intakes that price in the upper range of 3000 dollars.
Dave
10-28-2008, 10:34 AM
#24
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?p=10374004
guess i'll keep the two together so that both can be updated
how could the FI crowd be forgotten
guess i'll keep the two together so that both can be updated
how could the FI crowd be forgotten
Yes these will be great for the forced induction guys as well.
Dave
10-28-2008, 11:32 AM
#25
Looks similar in design to my sheetmetal intake which made about 40 more HP than my ported fast 90/90 and it rasied the RPM range about 400rpms.
The runners on this carbonfiber intake look to be a little longer and the plenum looks a little bigger. You could easily modify the inlet to accept a bigger throttle body also.... (my intake now has a 105mm TB on it, used to be a 90mm).
Nice lookin peice at a good price.
My intake..............
The runners on this carbonfiber intake look to be a little longer and the plenum looks a little bigger. You could easily modify the inlet to accept a bigger throttle body also.... (my intake now has a 105mm TB on it, used to be a 90mm).
Nice lookin peice at a good price.
My intake..............
11-02-2008, 08:37 PM
#37
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The first rectangle port is on my 402 L92 headed GTO. It a mild cam car with stock exhaust, and even the stock airbox.
Its not the ideal test-mule, but it will work for now. We have been using it to make the first rounds of fitment and tuning revisions.The first cathedral port intake is also going on a GTO which is a cam only LS2 with headers. (a slowhawk cam and tune)
This manifold would really shine on a more aggressive motor, but the only local Big dawg around here (Noyzee)
has his Camaro apart right now. I'm talking to some other big HP guys as well to get more dyno numbers lined up though.
11-02-2008, 08:51 PM
#38
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fall River, MA
Posts: 3,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree the more numbers the better.
The first rectangle port is on my 402 L92 headed GTO. It a mild cam car with stock exhaust, and even the stock airbox. Its not the ideal test-mule, but it will work for now. We have been using it to make the first rounds of fitment and tuning revisions.
The first cathedral port intake is also going on a GTO which is a cam only LS2 with headers. (a slowhawk cam and tune)
This manifold would really shine on a more aggressive motor, but the only local Big dawg around here (Noyzee) has his Camaro apart right now. I'm talking to some other big HP guys as well to get more dyno numbers lined up though.
The first rectangle port is on my 402 L92 headed GTO. It a mild cam car with stock exhaust, and even the stock airbox.
Its not the ideal test-mule, but it will work for now. We have been using it to make the first rounds of fitment and tuning revisions.The first cathedral port intake is also going on a GTO which is a cam only LS2 with headers. (a slowhawk cam and tune)
This manifold would really shine on a more aggressive motor, but the only local Big dawg around here (Noyzee)
has his Camaro apart right now. I'm talking to some other big HP guys as well to get more dyno numbers lined up though.Vinny I'd be willing to try it out on my car, i got a vic jr unported with an elbow and a Fast 90. 408 TFS heads 12-1 compression. we could do it at Slowhawks dyno.
11-03-2008, 05:51 PM
#40
8 second mod
iTrader: (37)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: East Side Performance! mASShole
Posts: 17,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
looks good vinny. if i had know it would be out so soon i would have left it together. i will try to get moving on it sooner then later for the big dawg test on my car.
you still want to test on the blue mule? i can do that this week if you want.
let me know
you still want to test on the blue mule? i can do that this week if you want.
let me know