NXL sucking the rails dry?
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: north dallas
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
anyone else having this problem. it sucks the rails dry and leans out for a split second. anyone have a cure for this besides a dedicated fuel system? i have the walbro 255lph intank pump right now and can install a NOS inline if it will help any.
also is anyone running a purge with this kit? i have mine set up with T's at the end of the fuel rail coming into a Y in the purge.
also is anyone running a purge with this kit? i have mine set up with T's at the end of the fuel rail coming into a Y in the purge.
#2
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JS12
anyone else having this problem. it sucks the rails dry and leans out for a split second. anyone have a cure for this besides a dedicated fuel system? i have the walbro 255lph intank pump right now and can install a NOS inline if it will help any.
also is anyone running a purge with this kit? i have mine set up with T's at the end of the fuel rail coming into a Y in the purge.
also is anyone running a purge with this kit? i have mine set up with T's at the end of the fuel rail coming into a Y in the purge.
Did you tune with this kit at all? I'd try it setup just with the purge at the nitrous Y connector with no T's on the end of the rail first and see what happens, then I'd try adding your inline pump...... if that doesn't work sounds like you need a beefier fuel system - replace the feed line with a bigger one and dual intank's or a big external.
Last question, what total RWHP with the N20 are you at? If you're over 600 I think you need a beefier fuel system.
#3
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This may be a stupid question, but has anyone thought of doing a fuel purge? I've read many times these direct port systems will have a tendancy to run lean because it take just a little extra time for the short fuel lines to fill before the N2O hits. Perhaps a manual type purge set up to the fuel solenoid to click it open for just a second and let fuel run down the line to the motor. The motor would probably go rich for a second but wouldn't cause any damage.
#4
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by bad2000ss
This may be a stupid question, but has anyone thought of doing a fuel purge? I've read many times these direct port systems will have a tendancy to run lean because it take just a little extra time for the short fuel lines to fill before the N2O hits. Perhaps a manual type purge set up to the fuel solenoid to click it open for just a second and let fuel run down the line to the motor. The motor would probably go rich for a second but wouldn't cause any damage.
I personally was thinking of purging the system at the rails before, but this got me to thinking about if that's a good idea.... so far he's the only guy I've heard doing this and he's the only one I've heard about going lean also.
#5
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: north dallas
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i will run it without the purge and see what it does. i will still have that slight hesitation right? the car picked up 125 on the 120 shot at about 975psi. total it was 550/566rwtq
#6
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JS12
i will run it without the purge and see what it does. i will still have that slight hesitation right? the car picked up 125 on the 120 shot at about 975psi. total it was 550/566rwtq
I'm glad someone is finally getting the advertised power on the dyno with how the jets are rated.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Your Walbro intank pump should be fine up to 600RWHP. Let us know what happens with the purge disconnected from the rails. BTW, really nice HP for stock heads man - especially on just motor. Was that 429 through a 12 bolt or stock rear?
#7
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: north dallas
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
through a 12 bolt with 4.11's and a steel driveshaft. i also had the shortbelt on which netted me 4rwhp and about 7rwtq. besides slicks i always dyno the car the way i run it at the track. should see some 1/4 times out of the car tomorrow at the GMHTP event. looking for some 10.30s@132ish
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JF WS6
That's an interesting idea, but I was wondering if the engineers didn't design the NXL to have a slightly delayed feed of nitrous into the rails to give the fuel kind of a "head start" sort of. That might be the reason there is a ever so slight hesitation noted with this kit. It's been noted that it does take a second for the fuel lines to fill up.
I personally was thinking of purging the system at the rails before, but this got me to thinking about if that's a good idea.... so far he's the only guy I've heard doing this and he's the only one I've heard about going lean also.
I personally was thinking of purging the system at the rails before, but this got me to thinking about if that's a good idea.... so far he's the only guy I've heard doing this and he's the only one I've heard about going lean also.
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
#9
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by L4m3r
I did try to purge the fuel also. First I closed the bottle and purged all the nitrous out.. Then I turned on the nitrous system without the car running but with the ignition on. I tapped the wide open switch 2 times and fuel was pushed into the system.. Ran it on the dyno again, and the spike was actually leaner but not as noticeable of a hesitation
bottle pressure was around 975psi. after the spike the a/f was about 11.8:1 and flat. Jamie try it again but dont wait as long as we did after i did the purge.
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
When was the last time the fuel filter was changed?
I'm just wondering how he went more lean when all you did was introduce more fuel into the cylinders? Or when you ran it again you did it with the nitrous and the bottle opened again. Were you tuning with edit on the dyno or just making runs?
I've heard of the rails being maxed out on fuel before on a system like this, but it's usually pushing quite a bit more HP than 550-600. I could see maxing out the fuel rails on like a 300 shot, but with the 120 that certainly shouldn't be happening. I think there's something else going on there, not sure what though.
#10
On The Tree
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JF WS6
Hmmm. Interesting. What size of injectors are on Jamie's car? Stock? Just curious. Do you know what the fuel pressure was during the lean spike? If it is the fuel system you'd have a noticeable FP drop I'd think. What's the regular FP?
When was the last time the fuel filter was changed?
I'm just wondering how he went more lean when all you did was introduce more fuel into the cylinders? Or when you ran it again you did it with the nitrous and the bottle opened again. Were you tuning with edit on the dyno or just making runs?
I've heard of the rails being maxed out on fuel before on a system like this, but it's usually pushing quite a bit more HP than 550-600. I could see maxing out the fuel rails on like a 300 shot, but with the 120 that certainly shouldn't be happening. I think there's something else going on there, not sure what though.
When was the last time the fuel filter was changed?
I'm just wondering how he went more lean when all you did was introduce more fuel into the cylinders? Or when you ran it again you did it with the nitrous and the bottle opened again. Were you tuning with edit on the dyno or just making runs?
I've heard of the rails being maxed out on fuel before on a system like this, but it's usually pushing quite a bit more HP than 550-600. I could see maxing out the fuel rails on like a 300 shot, but with the 120 that certainly shouldn't be happening. I think there's something else going on there, not sure what though.
maybe i missed the part where i said i cracked the bottle back open and did another run
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#11
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Very nice info dudes. I've been debating on the NXL or the Noszle kit for a while, and now it looks like people are getting good numbers with the kit. I don't mean to hyjack the thread, but would stock 2000 injectors and pump be sufficient for a 120 or 150 shot?
#12
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by bad2000ss
Very nice info dudes. I've been debating on the NXL or the Noszle kit for a while, and now it looks like people are getting good numbers with the kit. I don't mean to hyjack the thread, but would stock 2000 injectors and pump be sufficient for a 120 or 150 shot?
The stock fuel pump is probably only good to about 450RWHP or so, so as long as you're under that you'd be ok - anything above and you will need to go ahead and get a Walbro 340 intank, which when wired with a power wire from the alternator or batt. will support 600RWHP or a little more.
#13
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
JF WS6, actually you have heard of someone else going lean *with the wink of an eye*.
I had logged the lean spike to be about .25seconds, going from stoich, to 22.8:1 afr and down to 10.x:1 in that short little time. There were replies as to that being the "torque spike" so many see on a dyno, from the fuel at 55-58psi and weighing in heavy, trying to catch up to the N2O at 900+psi and light as hell. So, the lean spike I have is obviously nothing related to purging, but the above sounds abuot right. Is there anything to worry about, not that I can see. The dual purge on the end of the rail may make it more noticable, but thats about it.
Charlie.
I had logged the lean spike to be about .25seconds, going from stoich, to 22.8:1 afr and down to 10.x:1 in that short little time. There were replies as to that being the "torque spike" so many see on a dyno, from the fuel at 55-58psi and weighing in heavy, trying to catch up to the N2O at 900+psi and light as hell. So, the lean spike I have is obviously nothing related to purging, but the above sounds abuot right. Is there anything to worry about, not that I can see. The dual purge on the end of the rail may make it more noticable, but thats about it.
Charlie.
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey guys this is exactly what I was talking about. The rails lose all pressure for a split second that is why you get that hesitation/spike. NX has an accumulator coming out that you can attach to the rails that will allow the pressure to stay up. "priming" the lines isnt going to work because as soon as the fuel solenoid closes the fuel pressure doesnt stay up it drops because it equalizes the pressure through the jets into the engine.
As far as the nitrous getting to the NXL injector before the fuel that just isnt the case. Believe it or not the fuel gets there before the nitrous does. The nitrous has to travel through the lines then turn back into a liquid at the jet then get pushed into the combustion chamber. It is hard to believe but that is what happens so the purge location doesnt really matter.
Bottomline is that the rails have to build pressure past the fuel solenoid that is why there is a hesitation.
Mike
As far as the nitrous getting to the NXL injector before the fuel that just isnt the case. Believe it or not the fuel gets there before the nitrous does. The nitrous has to travel through the lines then turn back into a liquid at the jet then get pushed into the combustion chamber. It is hard to believe but that is what happens so the purge location doesnt really matter.
Bottomline is that the rails have to build pressure past the fuel solenoid that is why there is a hesitation.
Mike
#15
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CAT3
JF WS6, actually you have heard of someone else going lean *with the wink of an eye*.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
![Embarassed](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_emb.gif)
#16
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Would going lean for a 1/4 of a second cause any serious damage? I've seen people post with NOS 5177 dry kits and other alike that have a slight lean spike on the initial hit as well as others with select wet kits. It almost seems like this is normal for any type of nitrous kit.
#17
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: north dallas
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by bad2000ss
Would going lean for a 1/4 of a second cause any serious damage? I've seen people post with NOS 5177 dry kits and other alike that have a slight lean spike on the initial hit as well as others with select wet kits. It almost seems like this is normal for any type of nitrous kit.
#18
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bring it........ b*tch
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JS12
i believe it would. when you hit the nitrous and it has that hesitation that is not very good for the motor, i am not going to spray the car again until i have a seperate fuel system. i cannot live with this hesitation cause the car bogs out of the hole and drops below 3k and then shoots right back up when the juice hits.
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
I'm still waiting for parts to complete my setup (accessory stuff not related to the NXL kit directly) so I haven't had a chance to test it out yet, but I haven't heard of anyone's experience being this severe. If the car bogs badly off the line that's definatley no good, you can't get a decent 60' like that.
Maybe CAT3 will chime in here about his experience at the strip - he seemed to be running pretty well with the kit.
#19
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I havent had that bad a time with it really. JS12 I assume is a M6, and if so that might contribute to the bogging more so, anyway. I logged the car at launch and runs, again it only spikes for a quarter of a second, more so on the first full run, seems to be it gets less of a hesitation after that, but I only got 4 runs off a bottle due to storing in an AC'd room. Duh. So, that was also low bottle pressure at the track, on the testing road...humm I had better bottle pressure and again seen the hesitation time reduced dramatically.
I have run the 3 1/2 bottles so far, no problems really except maybe loose fittings/split o-rings either being my fault.
The car runs just as good on the DP 180 as it did a wet kit 175, but again this was with WAY lower bottle pressure, so I was running VERY rich, and my 60' were slower. So there is more testing this sat, Nov 22, as we in here in Hawaii head out for the Fastest Street Car Shootout. Will post back any new findings.
Good-luck
Charlie.
I have run the 3 1/2 bottles so far, no problems really except maybe loose fittings/split o-rings either being my fault.
The car runs just as good on the DP 180 as it did a wet kit 175, but again this was with WAY lower bottle pressure, so I was running VERY rich, and my 60' were slower. So there is more testing this sat, Nov 22, as we in here in Hawaii head out for the Fastest Street Car Shootout. Will post back any new findings.
Good-luck
Charlie.