TNT Dyno Graphs
Results for NA, 100-Shot, and 150-shot:

I loaded thre 200-shot jets and made a pull, but the car made almost the same power as the 150 pull? Either was way too fat, or not enough bottle pressure to support a 200 shot. Guess I will be getting a bottle warmer soon.
I was very happy with the NA numbers for a low compression motor. With the SLP maf and some MAFT tweaking, I should be able to find a little more power <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
Gotta go! Heading out to the track <img src="graemlins/burnout.gif" border="0" alt="[Burnout]" />
[ December 29, 2001: Message edited by: Reckless ]</p>
<strong>just wondering, why did you go low compression if you do not want to make it a blower motor?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I am not totally sure, but I think he used to have a turbo? I remember his page and I think he had a turbo. I could be right, or I could be very wrong..... I do not think it would hurt much as the N2O will have more combustion area to expand in with the low compression setup....
Chris
Made some shakedown runs at the track. Best was a 12.2 @ 119 hitting the 150-shot after going into 2nd gear. Car was not running that great. Need to tweak the NA setup and get a bottle heater. I think bottle pressure is hurting me.
I only gained 2mph and 3-tenths going from 100-shot to 150-shot. Running too much fuel and the N2O can't keep up. Will do some tuning when the MAF and MAFT arrive.
After I get things set up, I will go to the track on a "sticky" night and spray off the line.
Used to run a turbo, hence the 9:1 compression. Since I just got those pistons, I wasn't ready to invest in another set right away. I figure the lower compression is much safer anyhow.
Todd
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time


