Dyno results with 100 and 125 shot ,plus a few N/A runs
04-08-2002, 06:57 PM
#1
Dyno results with 100 and 125 shot ,plus a few N/A runs First run with a 100 shot I did 464.4 and 500 torque the guy at the shop said I should think about getting a intank fuel pump cause I’m not getting enough fuel.
Second run on a 125 shot was going to be pretty high maybe 500 rwhp but as you can see in the graph that my car just kinda fell on its face but still went 423.3rwhp and 545.4 torque. I had to cut that run short cause the SES was flashing and the car wasn’t running too good. I should of richened the car but it was still set at 2% lean on WOT stupid me!
2 of the N/A runs http://www.netsnapshot.com/users/628...WY_6283_25.jpg
3 N/A runs first run I let off cause my stupid shift light cam on early and 2 runs on N20
http://www.netsnapshot.com/users/628...Xc_6283_26.jpg
Same as above but also shows the Torque
http://www.netsnapshot.com/users/628...9I_6283_27.jpg
Sorry about these big *** pictures
One question is what would be better a inline fuel pump or intank fuel pump
Some people said I dont even need it and I could just richen the car up with the maf translator and it will be fine?
Do these numbers look right or is there something I am missing?
<small>[ April 08, 2002, 07:03 PM: Message edited by: WICKED SS ]</small>
Second run on a 125 shot was going to be pretty high maybe 500 rwhp but as you can see in the graph that my car just kinda fell on its face but still went 423.3rwhp and 545.4 torque. I had to cut that run short cause the SES was flashing and the car wasn’t running too good. I should of richened the car but it was still set at 2% lean on WOT stupid me!
2 of the N/A runs http://www.netsnapshot.com/users/628...WY_6283_25.jpg
3 N/A runs first run I let off cause my stupid shift light cam on early and 2 runs on N20
http://www.netsnapshot.com/users/628...Xc_6283_26.jpg
Same as above but also shows the Torque
http://www.netsnapshot.com/users/628...9I_6283_27.jpg
Sorry about these big *** pictures
One question is what would be better a inline fuel pump or intank fuel pump
Some people said I dont even need it and I could just richen the car up with the maf translator and it will be fine?
Do these numbers look right or is there something I am missing?
<small>[ April 08, 2002, 07:03 PM: Message edited by: WICKED SS ]</small>
04-09-2002, 07:11 AM
#2
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno results with 100 and 125 shot ,plus a few N/A runs </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by WICKED SS:
[QB]First run with a 100 shot I did 464.4 and 500 torque the guy at the shop said I should think about getting a intank fuel pump cause I’m not getting enough fuel.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Check out
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...;f=10;t=000412.
<small>[ April 09, 2002, 07:14 AM: Message edited by: jimmyS ]</small>
[QB]First run with a 100 shot I did 464.4 and 500 torque the guy at the shop said I should think about getting a intank fuel pump cause I’m not getting enough fuel.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Check out
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...;f=10;t=000412.
<small>[ April 09, 2002, 07:14 AM: Message edited by: jimmyS ]</small>
