How does the MAF compensate for the dry shot?
Science lol... riiiiiight.
I tried to tell you in an earlier post that a car with highway gears will not require as much fuel volume because the number of revolutions per time is much less than what you might run with a manual trans and 4 series rear gears.
I can't figure any reason why you'd call B.S. unless it just hurt your feelings that this actually happened and maybe you had to work more than twice as hard to get the same numbers.
You example of "highway gears" IS WRONG. The MORE air, the MORE fuel. As RPMS increase, in ANY MOTOR, with ANY Gear, whether is be 6000rpms with 3.23's, or 6000rpms with 4.10's, IT IS STILL 6000RPMS, needs the same fuel, because it has the same air, and same RPMS.
did you get kicked off the Ford forums?
Your car, do what you want, just don't MAKE **** up that is WRONG.
"duty cycle is just a number"
"I tried to tell you in an earlier post that a car with highway gears will not require as much fuel volume because the number of revolutions per time is much less than what you might run with a manual trans and 4 series rear gears."
"No they don't. That number is simply something the PCM calculates."
"Science lol... riiiiiight."
"who cares what your "injector duty cycle" is? It's just a number designed to freak you out and make you go buy injectors."
"Ignore the calculations for injector duty cycle. Those ideas are perpetuated by busines that sell injectors."
So much WRONG AND MIS-INFORMATION BY YOU TWO GUYS ITS REDICULOUS.
Like I said, your car, do what you want. I could care less, other than you are stating OBVIOUS WRONG information.
Your car, do what you want, just don't MAKE **** up that is WRONG.
"duty cycle is just a number"
"I tried to tell you in an earlier post that a car with highway gears will not require as much fuel volume because the number of revolutions per time is much less than what you might run with a manual trans and 4 series rear gears."
"No they don't. That number is simply something the PCM calculates."
"Science lol... riiiiiight."
"who cares what your "injector duty cycle" is? It's just a number designed to freak you out and make you go buy injectors."
"Ignore the calculations for injector duty cycle. Those ideas are perpetuated by busines that sell injectors."
So much WRONG AND MIS-INFORMATION BY YOU TWO GUYS ITS REDICULOUS.

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

http://home.comcast.net/~chalupa28/BYEBYECLUTCH.wmv

60'... 1.744
330... 4.883
1/8... 7.652
MPH... 89.27
990... 9.923
1/4... 12.113
MPH... 104.55
BEFORE 60# injectors anyway.
HOWEVER, this has NO relation to the topic at hand.
Even ford driver's filenames have excuses.
Even ford driver's filenames have excuses.It's okay to try and change subjects once you realize you were wrong, but please, admit to saying idiotic things first
. A/F is the key and you are satisfied that your's is safe and it works for you. When IDC is at 100%, the injector is contantly on and builds up heat, and as we all know, heat is the enemy of electric devices. Running 100% IDC (which you obviously are) is your choice and it's working for you. For how long... that is the question.
When IDC is at 100%, the injector is contantly on and builds up heat, and as we all know, heat is the enemy of electric devices. Running 100% IDC (which you obviously are) is your choice and it's working for you. For how long... that is the question.
A/F is the key and you are satisfied that your's is safe and it works for you. When IDC is at 100%, the injector is contantly on and builds up heat, and as we all know, heat is the enemy of electric devices. Running 100% IDC (which you obviously are) is your choice and it's working for you. For how long... that is the question.
Do you honestly think that your injectors are cool while you are running about town with a 220 degree engine??? What about the cooling effect of all that fuel passing through heat sinking that supposedly deadly heat away?
Bottom line (provided your injectors go wide open theory is true, and personally I don't know how you can prove that with a scanner) is that you should upgrade injectors when your pump is not capable of pushing fuel through the physical holes in the injectors in sufficient quantity to maintain AFR.
Last edited by Homeslice (tm); Feb 4, 2005 at 01:49 PM.
OK just for the sake of arguement lets say they do go static.... then they are fuel jets at that point like I said earlier. When that happens is all about your fuel pump delivering enough.
As far as changing the subject. I asked the question in the first place because I think you are **** hurt that a stock chevy made your Cobra look like a Garden Snake. I was making a point that all your theories and "ahem" knowledge didn't result in **** except a lighter wallet and now public ridicule.
I ask you what you ran and you show me a video entitled "byebyeclutch". OK so you blew up your clutch... I didn't ask you for the slowest run you made. The only reason I can come up with for posting that run is that you don't have a run that is faster and you want to use that slipping clutch bullshit as the standard cobra excuse. Pretty gay if you ask me.
Last edited by Homeslice (tm); Feb 4, 2005 at 01:50 PM.
I ask you what you ran and you show me a video entitled "byebyeclutch". OK so you blew up your clutch... I didn't ask you for the slowest run you made. The only reason I can come up with for posting that run is that you don't have a run that is faster and you want to use that slipping clutch bullshit as the standard cobra excuse. Pretty gay if you ask me.
Hurt that a chevy made more power????
First off, my brothers WS6 will destroy my 03 cobra (off spray). I actually have respect for GM's and fords. I'm not a blind loyal retard. The thought never even came across my mind about making this a "ford vs. chevy" argument. They are stupid, senseless, and immature. Give it up. As for other runs, I DO have faster runs. I see no need to tell you the times of my car. Here is an offspray video (the other vid. was on spray, 1st and 2nd gear). For arguments sake, or the lack there of, here is just one of my times that I actually have on video..R/T... .444
60'... 1.937
330... 5.017
1/8... 7.576
MPH... 96.42
990... 9.709
1/4... 11.622
MPH... 122.21
http://home.comcast.net/~sjvhsr/OFFSPRAYWEB.wmv
Lastly, I could care less if your car is "faster". There's TONS of cars faster than my car, your car, your brothers cousins sons uncles car. I could care less. As to my "theory" not resulting in better results, I have NO results with the 60# injectors. A bigger injector won't necessarily give you more power, but it leaves room on the table for you to make more power. I will be sure to post up what my times are with the 175 shot once I get the new clutch installed. Your OPINION about duty cycle and injector longetivity is rediculous. If you are running your injector remotely close to 100% duty cycle, you are asking for problems. I will pass on using 39# injectors on my car, with a 175 shot. OFF spray, I am already pushing 85% duty cycle, on the 30 shot I was at 90% duty cycle. As to the lighter wallet, I would much rather spend 440 on 60# injectors over the 3000 I would spend if I had a severe lean condition because there wasn't enough fuel. Now, to the public ridicule, you and your boyfriend are the ONLY people that would agree with your idiotic statements. IF your theory is correct, sell your 28# injectors and find some 14 pound injectors. It shouldn't matter according to you
.I honestly can't believe you think that injector size and duty cycle doesn't matter. I really can't believe it. Why in the world would they even make bigger injectors??? That's right, according to you, "so that aftermarket can just sell them".
Why would your car come with 28# injectors. I mean, they would have been fine running 14's, or even less
. Last edited by 5.8litrels1eater; Feb 4, 2005 at 02:12 PM.
Hurt that a chevy made more power????
First off, my brothers WS6 will destroy my 03 cobra (off spray). I actually have respect for GM's and fords. I'm not a blind loyal retard. The thought never even came across my mind about making this a "ford vs. chevy" argument. They are stupid, senseless, and immature. Give it up. As for other runs, I DO have faster runs. I see no need to tell you the times of my car. Here is an offspray video (the other vid. was on spray, 1st and 2nd gear).http://home.comcast.net/~sjvhsr/OFFSPRAYWEB.wmv
.I honestly can't believe you think that injector size and duty cycle doesn't matter. I really can't believe it.
.
Bottom line. I can't believe you are having a hard time with this.... what part of "I am doing it right now", didn't sink in? I am actually doing everything I claim where you haven't done ANYTHING at all. By your standards I shoulda blown up first time out but looky here... I didn't. If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck... it's a duck, and your theory.. looks like a turd and smells like a turd.
Quit trying to apply your car's situation to mine. It is completely different given your combo of boost and bottle.
Like "I" ALREADY STATED, I believe you are running what you are, BUT YOUR INJECTORS ARE MAXED OUT. When your injector fails do to the constant static condition, causing your injector to close most of the way or shorten/weaken pulse(it's not OPEN all the time, it PULSES OPEN, not pulses shut), don't come here complaining. You, my friend, are an idiot.
Boost or no boost, when duty cycle reaches 100% you aren't doing a favor to your motor. You're taking serious chances of the injector failing, thus rendering a lean condition, ultimately causing you some major headaches.
Like I HAVE SAID, YOUR CAR, do what you want. DON'T COME ON HERE giving people STUPID advice that their cars will be fine with stock injectors and a 200 dry shot.
This is a tech. site and you are giving HORRIBLE tech advice.
Last edited by 5.8litrels1eater; Feb 4, 2005 at 04:48 PM.

