nozzle shootout
I've read through this entire long drama and it seems to be fair enough. Like has been said before the entire package is where it is. Nozzle design versus placement also has an effect and I'm sure that will skew some results. Either way I don't think anyone is going to get slammed so it doesn't matter.
Jessie
Just to clarify before somone gets confused....you cant have more TQ without more HP at a given RPM. you can have more peak TQ at some rpm (usually lower rpms) and end up with the same peak HP.
But just for clarification...you cant have two setups dynoing 550 rwhp at 5000 rpm but one is 525 rwtq and the other is 575 rwtq at that 5000 rpm. If the HP is the same at the same rpm...then tq will be identical as well.
I just wanted to clarify the discussion. TQ and HP are thrown around so much i think some may get lost on occasion. You alwasy have to clarify at what rpm.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
By the way, thanks for taking the initiative on this, I, for one, am looking forward to the results.
Is the purpose of this test to see how well the nozzle atomizes the mixture or just test which flows better? If it is to test which flows better, wouldnt a jet size change make up for any inefficiencies for a particular nozzle? I would think the atomization is more important than the flow...am I looking at this wrong?
Last edited by dwayneracing; Mar 28, 2006 at 02:28 PM.
Robert


